Channel
@Pharmacists_33_Questions
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,742subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001251235100 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pharmacists_33_Questions |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pharmacists_33_Questions |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 1,742 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 1,743 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 1,743 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2025 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#تهنئة 🥳 يَسُر مناديب الدفعة مع اللجنة العلمية 33 أن نهنئكم بمناسبة حلول عيد الأضحى المُبارك ..🤍✨ وكل عام وأنتم ومن تحبون بخير، وتقبل الله مِنا ومنكم صالح الأعمال ..❤️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ #PH_مناديب_الدفعة_33 #Ph_اللجنة_العلمية_صيدلـ33ـة
❤1
نماذج وأسئلة الإختبارات_صيدلــ💊ــة_دفعـــ33ــة pinned «•┈••┈••┈••┈••┈••┈• ‧₊˚ ⋅⚕🧑🏻🔬 ‧₊˚ ⋅ اسعد الله اوقاتكم ✨ مرفق لكم اسئلة البنك بشكل استفتاء 🔥 رابط أول سؤال :- https://t.me/Pharmacists_33_Questions/9630 •┈••┈••┈••┈••┈••┈• #pharmacovigilance #Ph_اللجنة_العلمية_صيدلـ33ـة»
What is the purpose of Dear Healthcare Professional Letters:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
What is a good way to disseminate information to healthcare professionals:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Why is identifying confounding factors important in causality assessment:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following tools is used to assess causality in pharmacovigilance:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What type of materials do Pharmacovigilance teams create as part of their risk communication strategies:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is the goal of risk communication strategies developed by Pharmacovigilance teams:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is the purpose of safety alerts, warnings, and updates issued by regulatory agencies:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥1
Which of the following is a key challenge in pharmacovigilance:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Why is pharmacovigilance required in every country:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following is NOT a part of pharmacovigilance:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Pharmacists_33_Questions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which of the following is a key challenge in pharmacovigilance:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is the goal of risk communication strategies developed by Pharmacovigilance teams:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following is NOT a part of pharmacovigilance:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Why is pharmacovigilance required in every country:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is the purpose of safety alerts, warnings, and updates issued by regulatory agencies:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What type of materials do Pharmacovigilance teams create as part of their risk communication strategies:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2025 to 27 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نماذج وأسئلة الإختبارات_صيدلــ💊ــة_دفعـــ33ــة” (@Pharmacists_33_Questions), 1,742 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pharmacists_33_Questions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.