Channel
@Phantom_Defi_crpt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
5,048subscribers
-93 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002056282475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Phantom_Defi_crpt |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Phantom_Defi_crpt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 5,048 | -19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 5,067 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 5,085 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 5,101 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 5,112 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 5,126 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 5,139 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 5,141 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 5,141 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (27 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,149 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
WARNING: BITCOIN’S FINAL LIQUIDATION COULD START THIS WEEK Everyone is watching the bounce. Almost nobody is prepared for what could come after it. Every major cycle has eventually delivered the same opportunity: 2018 → $3K–$5K BUY ZONE 2022 → $16K–$20K BUY ZONE 2026 → $57K–$59K BUY ZONE READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2087280312212664352
SPACEX IS REPEATING NVIDIA, PALANTIR AND ROCKET LAB ALMOST PERFECTLY This is the part nobody wants to hear. Three of the biggest winners followed the SAME brutal playbook: NVIDIA: $0.05 → $0.55 → $0.08 → $0.90+ Rocket Lab: $10 → $17 → $3 → $32+ READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2087137012339863930
THE $SPCX TRAP IS SET SpaceX just ripped back to $133. +25% in TWO DAYS. And it happened immediately after 911.5M shares became eligible for sale. Think about that. Everyone was positioned for the unlock dump. 34% of the float was already short. READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2086728981722615900
I JUST OPENED A $SPCX SHORT AT $133 The market thinks the unlock risk is gone because $SPCX didn’t dump immediately. That’s exactly what makes this dangerous. The crowd is getting comfortable. READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2086533096996765787
SPX is approaching the UTAD and the structure is starting to look like a classic distribution setup. The biggest risk? The Fed turns hawkish again. Higher rates → tighter liquidity → less risk appetite → pressure on equities. And if that catalyst hits, I think the path gets ugly: Distribution More chop. More fake breakouts. More buyers getting trapped near the highs. Breakdown → Spring READ🫣⬇️ https://x.co…
$SPCX HOLDERS ARE ABOUT TO FIND OUT WHO WAS RIGHT I’m staying OUT. 911M shares just unlocked. At $120, that’s roughly $109 BILLION of potential supply hitting the market. Now look at the other side: Nasdaq-100 inclusion → READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2086184802021962202
THIS S&P 500 PATTERN SHOULD TERRIFY YOU I went back and compared today’s S&P 500 structure with the Dot-Com Bubble. The similarities are getting VERY hard to ignore. Same violent correction. Same recovery. Same push toward fresh highs. And now we’re seeing extreme valuations while retail participation is back near historic highs. 1999 → Dot-Com Bubble READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2086041196346929…
I WAS RIGHT AGAIN: DON'T BUY $SPCX YET The biggest trap is happening right now. 911M new shares just hit the market. Price is still holding. Everyone suddenly thinks the sell-off is over. That's exactly how market makers want you to think. Here's what's really happening: • Shorts are locking in profits → short-term bounce. READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2085818570815012935
🚨 THIS IS HOW EVERY MAJOR MARKET TOP LOOKS BEFORE IT BREAKS Everyone is celebrating. I'm getting ready. The S&P 500 just printed another all-time high at 7,791. Meanwhile: • Oil is back at $80 • The Strait of Hormuz is blocked • The Middle East is spiraling further into conflict READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2085663623548961273
🚨 95% OF BITCOIN HOLDERS ARE ABOUT TO MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE AGAIN. Every cycle ends the same way. People panic. Smart money buys. My roadmap hasn't changed: $64K → $52K → READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2085461842558603664
🚨 IF THIS CHART DOESN'T MAKE YOU UNCOMFORTABLE, NOTHING WILL. I keep waiting for this fractal to break. It refuses to. The Dot-Com bubble and today's S&P 500 are still moving almost step for step. Look at the sequence: → Final blow-off rally → First sharp rejection READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/2085300432675500237
🚨 THE MARKET IS ABOUT TO REALIZE WHAT IT MISSED ON $XRP Everyone is waiting for confirmation. By the time it comes... the move could already be over. $XRP is sitting on the same macro support that launched the 2017 monster rally. The structure looks almost identical. If this plays out again, here's what I'm watching: → First major resistance: $3.00–3.50 READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0xPhantomDefi/status/20851136307…
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Phantom_Defi_crpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Phantom_Defi” (@Phantom_Defi_crpt), 5,048 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Phantom_Defi_crpt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.