Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Peter Brandt 🐳 Official Channel

Channel

Peter Brandt 🐳 Official Channel

@PeterLBrandtOfficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

835subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001433436958
TypeChannel
Username@PeterLBrandtOfficial
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PeterLBrandtOfficial

Growth

835846840.57 August 2026 — 845 subscribers7 August 2026 — 845 subscribers7 August 2026 — 846 subscribers15 August 2026 — 843 subscribers22 August 2026 — 841 subscribers29 August 2026 — 835 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 22 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 833–848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 05:05835-6
22 Aug 2026, 18:34841-2
15 Aug 2026, 03:14843-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:36846+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:46845no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:36845first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 August 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2026, 22:18 UTC134 viewsread 7 August 2026

📕 Losing Streak Many beginners expect a profitable trading strategy to generate profits consistently. In reality, even a system with a 40% win rate will inevitably produce losing streaks. Over a sample of 100 trades, the probability of experiencing 5 consecutive losses is about 95%. A streak of 8 losses occurs in nearly every second cycle, while 10 losses in a row are far from uncommon. This is not a system failur

27 Feb 2026, 06:20 UTC262 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

So, buying XAUt contributes to blowing up overleveraged banks? Hold my beer!

15 Dec 2025, 16:54 UTC328 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$BTC🍦1W In the medium term, the bias remains bearish 🦈 Additional manipulation followed by a rebalance of inefficiency may provide an opportunity to open a short position with a potential downside of around ~38%. 🎁Targets: $74,508, $66,835, $58,946

2 Nov 2025, 14:31 UTC325 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$JUP🎂1D The asset is showing strong relative strength 🐰 compared to most instruments. A sweep of the previous day’s low would create a great opportunity to open a long position. 🚀Targets: $0.4543, $0.4818

18 Oct 2025, 19:00 UTC292 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$BTC🎁1D 💎 The asset shows clear signs of distribution, and in the area of bearish inefficiency (POI), a reversal pattern is likely to form — signaling the continuation of downward price movement. This setup will be used to open a short position. 🧱Targets: $102000, $98200, $92800

12 Oct 2025, 04:38 UTC257 viewsread 7 August 2026

The Night Crypto Market Crashed — the Biggest One-Day Loss in History 🩸 The collapse came right after a shocking statement from the U.S. President: Trump announced a 100% tariff increase on Chinese goods. In the past 24 hours, long positions worth a record $19 billion have been liquidated. Many altcoins lost over 70% of their value in minutes: 💀 $ATOM: −99.9% ($4 → $0.01) 💀 $AVAX: −71% ($28 → $8) 💀 $SUI: −83% ($3.

12 Oct 2025, 04:35 UTC190 viewsread 7 August 2026

Risk Management vs. Recklessness ⚔️ Last night the market wiped out billions in liquidations ($19B) — and with them, dozens of personal tragedies. It’s yet another reminder of how fragile we are when overconfident about risk. 🐰 You can be wrong in your analysis, timing, or instrument choice — but if your risk is limited, you’ll stay in the game. If you believe you can trade without a stop loss and “close in time,

7 Oct 2025, 06:20 UTC173 viewsread 7 August 2026

Practices That Improved My Trading Results 🧠 Success in trading doesn’t come only from individual trades — it’s built from discipline, habits, and small consistent rules that shape decision quality. ⸻ 🎯 Basic Level: Discipline and Control • Fewer assets — deeper focus. Trading just 2–3 pairs helps you understand their behavior better and avoid random trades. • Loss limits. Set maximum loss limits for the day, we

17 Sept 2023, 03:02 UTC805 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐳 A new PUMP ⚡️ Whale Peter Brandt 🐳. 👉 To participate please send "PUMPS " to our manager @AmandaAdmin. This is a paid channel (one time lifetime fee) 🚀 Previous PUMPS: IRIS/USDT +255% 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.me/PeterLBrandtOfficial/1564 PEPE/USDT +171% 🔥🔥https://t.me/PeterLBrandtOfficial/1598 COMP/USDT +132% 🔥 https://t.me/PeterLBrandtOfficial/1601 STMX/USDT +259% 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.me/PeterLBrandtOfficial/1608 ALPACA/USDT +1

7 Sept 2023, 04:12 UTC734 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊🔍 Whalemap believes that the $26,400 level on BTC could be a key short-term resistance level based on whale trading levels.

3 Sept 2023, 12:22 UTC622 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊 The number of BTC kits has reached a 10-month high amid recent fluctuations in the exchange rate of the first cryptocurrency - Glassnode.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PeterLBrandtOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Peter Brandt 🐳 Official Channel” (@PeterLBrandtOfficial), 835 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PeterLBrandtOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.