Channel
@Peri_Glitter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003821127463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Peri_Glitter |
| Description | канал привязан к сетке @precious_glitter_com |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 27 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Peri_Glitter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 9 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 9 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5276401506780726834 | 29 | 39.2% | |
| custom 5433810189868374703 | 25 | 33.8% | |
| custom 5436234093316553433 | 12 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5434094138746221926 | 8 | 10.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| otQSGlitter | 2 | 31 May 2026 | 8 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 15 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
#qs О нет... Я уже узнаю тебя по стилю письма. Как я говорила ранее, мне он понравился, но с напитками в нашем городке это не сравнится. 📖 ....... Я очень хочу тебя заблокироваать, но тебе пока что везет, я держусь.
custom 52764015067807268341custom 54338101898683747031
#запись№13 Черт, с каждым днем я все сильнее и сильнее забываю писать в этот канал. 😠 Так, ладно. Спустя несколько недель наконец-то доставили этот ваш "Тархун". На вкус он... Хороший? 🌟 Ну ладно, мне по крайней мере понравилось, но напитки в нашем пляжнем городке будут лучше. Надеюсь до меня больше не будут докапываться с этим тархуном.🌟
custom 52764015067807268341
#запись№12 Сегодня впервые было НЕ пасмурно, к удивлению. Мои некоторые растения после долгой пасмурной погоды начали медленно завядать, но славу богу, что наконец появилось солнце. Еще сегодня мне чуть 5 горшков с цветками не убили. Какие в последнее время неаккуратные самоцветы! Не следят, что у них под ногами.
custom 54362340933165534333custom 54338101898683747031
#запись№11 ПРИВЕТ-ПРИВЕТ ВСЕМ МОИМ ЧИТАТЕЛЯМ 👋👋👋👋 Блин, вы снова меня извините, что я пропала на такое время... Я просто как-то это устройство, которое называют телефоном, потеряла. Сама до сих пор не совсем понимаю как так получилось. Может быть к этому причастны глупые чайки.😡 В общем, я нашла свой телефон возле дома Стивена. И ведь никто даже не увидел, что под лестницей что-то лежит. Ну ладно, как у вас всех …
custom 54362340933165534332
#qs Перидот!! Какую музыку ты больше всего предпочитаешь? Музыку? Хм. Я даже и не знаю. Я не так часто её слушаю... Но я помню, как мне когда-то понравилась песня где там пелось что-то на подобии... Сейчас попытаюсь вспомнить. Ах, да! "And Jane, you're early. Your life's work is dirtied by the fools. Who adore you". Вот вроде такие слова там были.. Я реально точно не помню.⭐
custom 52764015067807268342
Помню как на меня один раз упал огромный булыжник и я при этом не пуфнулась..⭐
#qs Хей, Перидот, расскажи немного о себе, типа, о самих камнях. Что знаешь о них? Чем интересным вы отличаетесь от остальных? Хммм... Я не совсем хорошо поняла вопрос, но как я поняла, тут имеется ввиду рассказать о самоцветах.. Ну чтож, наша раса подразумевает, по вашему, инопланетную жизнь, которая сделана из камня. Наше тело состоит из света, если кратко объясниться. Если же долго и нудно, то наши тела — это даже…
custom 54338101898683747031
#запись№10 ОЙ-ОЙ, я очень сильно извиняюсь перед своими зрителями за то, что так пропала на несколько дней... На.. На сколько?? Ах, целых на 17 дней!! Господи. Как я вижу, у меня теперь целых 10 зрителей, боже мой.😟 Хорошо, как насчет того, чтобы вы позадавали мне вопросов? Или рассказали, что у вас происходило за время моего отсутствия.👍
custom 52764015067807268341custom 54338101898683747031
#qs Привет, Перидот. Хотела ли ты вернуть себе обратно удлинители конечностей? А если и нет, то почему? Хмм. Спорный вопрос. Может быть и да, но я все же выберу нет. Для меня это как пережиток прошлого Родного Мира. Так сказать, олицетворение на то, что я смогла принять Землю и откинуть назад технологии Родного Мира. М-да, на видео я показана как способная лишь на интеллектуальный образ мышления и озабоченная об бл…
custom 52764015067807268341custom 54338101898683747031
#сапп всех с первым днем лета и скорейшим инсультом для 9-классников.
#Запись №9 Как же сложно бывает работать с принтером! Сегодня я попросила Стивена распечатать несколько листов с важной информацией, но у него не было принтера в доме. Нам пришлось отправиться в другое место, где он мог бы это сделать. Когда мы пришли туда, то уже напечатали половину листов, но не хватило бумаги. Стивен пошёл за новой, а меня попросил найти место, где остановился принтер. Когда он вернулся, я сообщ…
custom 52764015067807268344custom 54338101898683747033
#Запись№8 ОХХ, У МЕНЯ ВЧЕРА ТАКОЙ ДЕНЬ БЫЛ, что я забыла написать сюда по поводу этого. Вы не представляете, как сложно работать с самоцветами, которые вообще ни в чем не понимают!!! Один аметист меня спросил вчера: «Можно ли брать энергию от всяких розеток и телефонов?». Это был для меня такой глупый вопрос, если честно! Но он меня заставил задуматься. Поэтому я и несколько аметистов решили это проверить. Ну и, ка…
custom 54338101898683747034
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Peri_Glitter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,086,239 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ƿ૯ʀɪᑯ૦੮ 🧪◌༅. —” (@Peri_Glitter), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Peri_Glitter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.