Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Perfex_Channel

Channel

Perfex_Channel

@Perfex_Channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,642subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001157476177
TypeChannel
Username@Perfex_Channel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Perfex_Channel

Growth

1,6421,6631,652.56 August 2026 — 1,662 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,662 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,663 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,661 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,659 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,657 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,649 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,644 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,642 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,639–1,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 07:131,642-2
26 Aug 2026, 15:331,644-5
23 Aug 2026, 07:421,649-8
19 Aug 2026, 10:351,657-2
16 Aug 2026, 03:481,659-2
12 Aug 2026, 23:231,661-2
9 Aug 2026, 23:321,663+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:071,662no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:031,662first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 4 July 2023the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
350.0%
👍350.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2023 to 14 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2024, 21:51 UTC≈1,950 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

In hurry¡¡!! I got 100$ kcc eth-Peg (krc20 chain) I will sell it to you for 70$ U need to swap to normal ether on bcs chain like 3$ fee on kcs coin but i dont have On this website: Bridge.kcc.oi Easy 25$ of ur life @PerfexCode

3👍1

Signed PerfexCode

20 Sept 2023, 14:46 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

FNBO: -Login -Name+address -Email(comcast=can be reset) 75 year old victim Good for ACH plays Instant Plaid Pm me @Noobtopro2nd ESCROW ACCEPTED

Signed Noobtopro

2 Sept 2023, 13:22 UTC≈1,630 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Anyone knows any website to buy cheap virtual phone numbers?? Like usa france etc

Signed PerfexCode

15 Jul 2023, 16:50 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 7 August 2026

If you read this keep your shit out of my name

Signed PerfexCode

15 Jul 2023, 16:50 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Careful of these mfs lmao Using my name as i expose scam people and when you click show proof it goes to his selling channel Smart fucker, if he put his iq in legit shit he wouldve been better

Signed PerfexCode

4 Jul 2023, 12:10 UTC≈4,470 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Guys, im looking for a job like freelance shit or idk, i saw many do this, for example they convert file, they do traduction of languages or any other thing that doesnt require very professional work. if you got any idea where i find this or if you got an advice im here thanks in advance. any information can help @PerfexCode

👍2

Signed PerfexCode

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Perfex_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 469,338 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Perfex_Channel” (@Perfex_Channel), 1,642 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Perfex_Channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.