Channel
@PenseSimples
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,380subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001219044933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PenseSimples |
| Description | Notícias e artigos que vão abrir sua cabeça e te ajudar a pensar cada vez mais simples! Inovação, empreendedorismo, gráficos, vídeos e muito mais. Www.gustavocaetano.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PenseSimples |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 9,380 | -30 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 9,410 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 9,414 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (26 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,766 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Eu confesso que mudança societária em empresa de IA me interessa menos pela fofoca e mais pelo botão de exportar. A Manus anunciou que vai voltar a operar de forma independente da Meta. Para alguns usuários, isso significa apagar dados gerados depois da aquisição e ficar 2 dias sem acesso. A própria ferramenta abriu uma janela de backup e restauração. Eu faria uma regra bem simples: fornecedor mudou de dono, faça b…
Eu gosto de resposta rápida, mas alguém precisa pagar o aluguel da mesa onde a IA deixa o contexto aberto. O KV cache evita que o modelo refaça os mesmos cálculos a cada palavra. Em troca, cada conversa longa ocupa mais memória. Se fosse no meu time, eu mediria três tempos: quanto demora para começar, qual é o ritmo depois e quantas conversas cabem juntas. Uma resposta rápida numa máquina vazia pode virar fila quand…
Video, posted without a caption
Eu fiquei encucado com uma coisa: tem founder colocando app no ar em uma tarde e deixando a porta do banco de dados aberta por semanas. Velocidade é ótima. Mandar os dados do usuário junto é um bônus que ninguém pediu. O Sentris procura no projeto chaves expostas, tabelas sem proteção e rotas que aceitam qualquer identidade. Se o seu produto usa Supabase, é uma ferramenta para testar antes do primeiro usuário pago e…
Eu gosto da liberdade do open source, mas ela vem com uma conta que muita gente esquece. O OpenCode deixa o time escolher o modelo de IA, trabalhar no terminal e limitar o que o agente pode fazer. Isso reduz dependência de fornecedor. Não elimina custo, risco nem responsabilidade. Se fosse no meu time, eu começaria num repositório descartável, sem segredos e sem acesso à produção. Testaria cinco tarefas com duas opç…
Eu confesso que gasto de nuvem sem dono me incomoda mais do que conta alta. Conta alta você discute. Custo sem projeto, produto ou equipe vira um órfão caro na planilha. Encontrei o Untagged, que lê o CSV de custos no próprio navegador e mostra quanto ficou sem as tags obrigatórias. Eu faria o financeiro e o time de tecnologia olharem o mesmo arquivo por meia hora: o que não tiver dono ganha um, uma correção ou uma …
Eu fiquei pensando no que acontece depois que a IA escreve o código. Quando o sistema cai às três da manhã, não basta um agente responder rápido. A Resolve AI aposta em encontrar a causa, mostrar a evidência e limitar o risco operacional de cada ação. Se fosse no meu time, eu escolheria um alerta frequente e deixaria o agente só investigar por quatro semanas. Mediria o tempo até a primeira hipótese útil, os erros e …
Eu tenho uma implicância com campanha que mede clique e comemora cedo. Entre o clique no Instagram e a instalação do app existe um buraco bem caro: o navegador interno pode dificultar a ida pra App Store. A AppPage junta iPhone, Android e web num único link, detecta o aparelho e tenta tirar o usuário desse desvio. Eu usaria em uma campanha pequena e compararia clique, chegada à loja e instalação. Se o anúncio funcio…
Eu confesso que desconfio de IA que escreve proposta comercial bonita demais. É justamente onde uma frase inventada vira contrato perdido ou problema jurídico. A Lucius fez algo mais interessante: num edital de £950 mil, gerou um rascunho em cinco minutos, mas abriu avisando que 11 exigências dependiam de um parceiro ainda não indicado. Eu faria assim em qualquer proposta importante do time: a IA acelera a escrita, …
Photo, posted without a caption
Eu acho que escolher qual IA usar virou o novo escolher celular: rende horas de conversa e quase nenhuma entrega. A Tryall tenta tirar essa escolha do caminho. Você escreve o pedido e ela decide qual modelo chamar. Eu usaria por uma semana nas tarefas repetidas do time e anotaria só duas coisas: quantas vezes foi preciso refazer e quanto tempo deixou de morrer na escolha da ferramenta. Se o roteador errar, você des…
Eu gosto da ideia de tratar IA como tecnologia normal. Não porque ela seja pequena, mas porque um modelo não reorganiza uma empresa sozinho. Entre a demonstração e o resultado existem processo, integração, confiança e gente responsável. Se fosse no meu time, eu escolheria um fluxo que já usa IA e mediria três coisas por uma semana: se o modelo entrega, se a saída entra no processo e se o ganho continua depois da rev…
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @PenseSimples. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 192,020 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pense Simples, por Gustavo Caetano / inovação e empreendedorismo” (@PenseSimples), 9,380 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PenseSimples.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.