Channel
@Pedo_Hunters_Channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,149subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001340429295 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pedo_Hunters_Channel |
| Created | 23 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pedo_Hunters_Channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 4,149 | +10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 4,139 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 4,137 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 4,139 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 4,139 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
940 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 356 | 37.9% | |
| 🤮 | 253 | 26.9% | |
| 👍 | 165 | 17.6% | |
| 🤬 | 103 | 11.0% | |
| 🤔 | 37 | 3.94% | |
| 😢 | 26 | 2.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 940reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2024 to 18 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A person arrested name Angel Almeida in currently in court for his ties to Child Sexual Abuse Material. He is alleged to be involved in an online group called 764. I am not a lawyer, but I do not believe what he said in court will work in his favor
👏45👍9🤬8🤔5😢4
Good news everybody, Cxrpse has been arrested and other 764 members are being vanned one by one. Don't forget to track down every single one that went into hiding or deleted their accounts by sending cybertips to the feds https://www.ed.nl/international/images-so-gruesome-that-detectives-cannot-bear-to-look-at-them-eindhoven-resident-24-played-a-leading-role-in-sadistic-network~a2c2bbb7/
👏46👍10🤬6
The FBI has caught another 764 member https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/member-violent-extremist-network-764-charged-animal-crushing-sexual-exploitation-minor
👏27👍7🤬4
Wondering why CSAM groups and spammers are getting banned in a few days instead of months like it used to be? Apparently, due to the DSA, telegram has implemented media hashing and AI technologies in order to scan all the content uploaded onto the platform, automatically ban the offenders and report them to the authorities. We approve of the media hashing decision since its error rate is abysmally low and highly ef…
👍35👏17🤮7
Updated list of what's happened so far
👏32👍4🤔3
Photo, posted without a caption
🤮57🤬16👍2👏2
Another 764 member locked up https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdva/pr/virginia-man-serve-15-years-stalking-possession-child-pornography
👍10👏8🤔4
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/jersey-city-man-charged-possession-child-pornography
🤮18👍3👏3🤔1
Today Jairo Jaime Tinajero, 25, of Kentucky, United States, plead guilty to a series of charges in relation to online activity in a group named "764". The court details are pretty bad. In summary, Mr. Tinajero and a currently unidentified co-conspirator enticed an underage woman to produce CSAM (child sexual abuse material) for them. When the victim refused to produce more CSAM, Mr. Tinajero and the co-conspirator d…
👏85👍12🤔4
The italian police has arrested a 15 yo 764 member, just today. We know that pedos are monitoring us so we want them to know that it is only a matter of time until we get them https://www.ansa.it/english/newswire/english_service/2025/02/12/boy-15-arrested-in-bolzano-for-supremacist-terrorism-3_78ade1f8-3af9-417d-a082-9eea851fb06e.html
👏27🤬2👍1🤔1
Another 764 member has been arrested, keep up the good work community https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9w5rkzxjl4o
👏17🤮15
This so-called "Electronic Genital Verification" (EGV) is an outrageous violation of privacy and human dignity, disguised as a security measure. The idea of forcing travelers to have their genitals photographed and scanned by AI under the guise of "protecting Texans" is dystopian and deeply invasive. Such biometric surveillance normalizes extreme government overreach, conditioning people to accept intimate violations…
🤬27🤮14🤔9👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Pedo_Hunters_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,061,325 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PEDO HUNTERS CHANNEL” (@Pedo_Hunters_Channel), 4,149 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pedo_Hunters_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.