А я канал нашла.. кто живой 🙂
❤🔥3💋1💘1

Channel
@PearllSchannell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002152609873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PearllSchannell |
| Description | Канал о жизни своей собственной жемчужины!(•̀ᴗ-) |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 3 August 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PearllSchannell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 4 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 4 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
43 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 8 | 18.6% | |
| custom 5413650730072428710 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.33% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2024 to 9 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А я канал нашла.. кто живой 🙂
❤🔥3💋1💘1
Посмотрела я как Йошка кошка ложка поварежка (саппорт голубой жемчуг) поделились своим юзом, да и решила, что мне тоже стоит сообщить, где можно меня найти. Юзик:: @bRoosHk, если что я Брошка(брошь)/Бришка(бри), она/ее. Меня можно найти в таких сетках, как NANAgram (я саппорт Такуми, скоро доступ будет опубликовал в канале а пока вот он:: тык), Vmeste (Кирилл Гречкин). Если вам интересна я, как саппорт, можете предло…
🍾1💋1
Channel name was changed to «Архив 🐚// 𝘐'𝘮 𝘢 𝘗𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭.»
Владелец сетки покинул нас, вслед за ним ее покидаю и я, но сообщество меток слишком классное, так что ищите меня в других. С вами была Брошка! Всем удачи!!
💔1
#адм:: 🌟 — Наш владелец чутчут ушел, я в последние дни только спать и успеваю, какого-либо контента не ждите, но если будете задавать вопросы в аноне, на все отвечу. Простите тетю😢
💋4
Последнее В чем ты не согласна с мнением людей? В том, что вы умнейшая расса на плане. Лиши людей всех изобретений, да просто отключи всем интернет и вы все впадаете в панику и не выглядете, как существа, способные выжить самостоятельно.
🕊2
Существует ли идеал красоты? Все мы по-своему красивы и идеальны!
Чему бы ты хотела научиться? Понимать юмор, особенно клоунов
🤗3
Самый приятный комплимент, который ты получала? Не думаю, что это комплимент, но.. мне сказали, что я своя собственная. Это было просветлением и сейчас мне кажется очень приятным. Но, наверное, больше всего меня радует, когда меня хвалят за то, что я делаю что-то хорошее для других. Это действительно важно для меня, больше, чем любые комплименты, например, о силе или красоте.
🍓2
На какие вопросы ты никогда не станешь отвечать? Я не буду вам говорить на какие темы я бы не стала говорить, вы же точно о подобном спросите.
👀1😘1
Чем ты больше всего гордишься? Стивеном. Его школой и тем, что он смог! Переход в новую эру это повод для гордости
🍾3
Веришь ли в мистику? Приведений, духов? Нет, все это придумано для того, чтобы пугать маленьких детей. А ранее этим объясняли то, что не могли понять.
🍓1👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PearllSchannell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PearllSchannell named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Архив 🐚// 𝘐'𝘮 𝘢 𝘗𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭.” (@PearllSchannell), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PearllSchannell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.