Channel
@PayingBotsChecked
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001253189516 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PayingBotsChecked |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 9 May 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PayingBotsChecked |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 35 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 36 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 May 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reliable Investment Center pinned «Hello Team! As I said last month my service is open offering an investment opportunity for all of you. These pooled funds take money from investors to invest in forex. The money pooled is invested, and the investors share any profits and losses incurred by…»
Hello Team! As I said last month my service is open offering an investment opportunity for all of you. These pooled funds take money from investors to invest in forex. The money pooled is invested, and the investors share any profits and losses incurred by the trades. With 13 Days of Trading, my investors already earned almost 5%. With full transparency everyday, week, month, spreadsheet of trades or trades log wil…
Reliable Investment Center pinned a photo
You have no idea how much your efforts and compassion can make a difference in someones life, or in thousands of lives. Never pass up a chance to be these reasons for someone.
Reliable Investment Center pinned a photo
IN A FEW WEEKS 97% OF PEOPLE WILL GO BACK TO THE WAY THINGS WERE - Complaining about their job - Bad spending habits - Not preparing for the future 3% WILL COME BACK STRONGER - A new learned skill - Started a side hustle - Invested in their future WHICH GROUP WILL YOU BE IN?
Reliable Investment Center pinned «What is your opinion of HYIPs that offer variable interest rates?»
What is your opinion of HYIPs that offer variable interest rates?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Variable interest rate means you paid different profit every day. It's the opposite of the fixed daily rate where you get paid the same profit all the time As with every Opinion Poll let me just say a big thank you in advance to everyone who participates. Remember there are no right or wrong answers, it’s just about what you think is accurate at the time of writing. Voting takes literally a second and stays at all t…
Reliable Investment Center pinned a photo
Bitcoin Price Unfazed by 50-BTC Transaction From Satoshi-Era Wallet Is that you Satoshi?😱 50 BTC minted in 2009 have been moved for the first time in 11 years. The coins in this transaction were mined in the first month of Bitcoin's existence.
Reliable Investment Center pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PayingBotsChecked. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What is your opinion of HYIPs that offer variable interest rates?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2020 to 7 June 2020. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reliable Investment Center” (@PayingBotsChecked), 35 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PayingBotsChecked.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.