Channel
@PavneetSinghUPSC
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,797subscribers
-161 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001653371953 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PavneetSinghUPSC |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PavneetSinghUPSC |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 13,797 | -19 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 13,816 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 13,820 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 13,823 | -17 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 13,840 | -21 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 13,861 | -13 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 13,874 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 13,882 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:44 | 13,889 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 13,899 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 13,900 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 13,914 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 13,916 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 13,917 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 13,923 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 13,926 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 13,924 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 13,935 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 13,937 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 13,931 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (30 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 15,921 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
At the end of Week 2, don't ask yourself, “Did I understand Political Science?” That would be a ridiculous standard after such limited exposure. Instead, examine what happened while you were trying to understand it. When two serious arguments contradicted each other, did that contradiction irritate you or interest you? When there was no immediate one-line answer, did you disengage or begin reasoning? When we separate…
Signed Pavneet Singh
In order to help you all with processing current affairs regularly through the techniques we learned in the course yesterday, I will be sharing daily questions to help you all practice with the skills learned. You can practice the daily questions here. https://www.instagram.com/p/Dcsg6IURw2c/?igsi=MTBnemI1aDZ2d2IwZw==
Signed Pavneet Singh
Current Affairs Class Schedule. Please ensure 6 copies of print outs of the workbook as we will be doing six topics in three days. See Workbook —> https://www.pavneet.org/learn/CA2027COURSE
Signed Pavneet Singh
Consider this apparently obvious statement: “Citizens should obey the law.” Most of us understand it immediately. Political Science then starts causing trouble. Every law? Why should citizens obey? Because they fear punishment? Because they consent to political authority? Because democracy has authorised the government? Because social order requires obedience? What if the law is unjust? What if it violates a fundamen…
Signed Pavneet Singh
Reminder: We begin at 8:00 PM sharp tonight. Don't let your UPSC 2027 Prelims attempt be compromised by guesswork or delayed preparation. This is your chance to get the right direction and build the exact skills you need from day one. Please ensure you join and attend live: 👉 https://www.pavneet.org/learn/2027WORKSHOP
Signed Pavneet Singh
Those who have enrolled in the GS Prelims Alignment Workshop for 30 August-2027. They are requested to kindly log in to the course page on the platform and download and print the "Reflective Exercise Framework Sheet" attached. This is to be used along with the Workshop Workbook. Course: https://www.pavneet.org/learn/2027WORKSHOP See you live in the course. Thanks.
Signed Pavneet Singh
Please print this workbook for the GS Prelims 2027 Alignment Workshop class for Sunday-30 August. Please ensure that the learnings from this workshop are then integrated in your note making of all GS Subjects you prepare for 2027 Prelims. Course: https://www.pavneet.org/learn/2027WORKSHOP See you live on Sunday in the course.
Signed Pavneet Singh
Everybody who follows politics has opinions. A law is good or bad. A government is right or wrong. A protest is justified or unjustified. A country should pursue one policy rather than another. But having political opinions and studying Political Science are not the same intellectual activity. Suppose you tell me, “An unjust law should be disobeyed.” That is a position. Political Science immediately asks you to do mo…
Signed Pavneet Singh
Good evening Current Affairs class today will be at 9.30 pm instead of 8.30 pm. Thanks
Signed Pavneet Singh
Before Week 1 of the PSIR Decision Project ends, I want you to conduct a small audit. Take a blank page. Write the optional you are currently considering at the top. If you are confused between two, write both. Then examine why those names are on that page in the first place. Ask yourself whether your decision has been influenced primarily by topper marks, syllabus length, popularity, coaching availability, somebody …
Signed Pavneet Singh
“I am interested in politics, therefore I should take PSIR” sounds perfectly logical until we examine what the sentence actually means. You may enjoy elections, geopolitics, Parliament, international affairs and political debates. But consuming political events and studying Political Science are different intellectual activities. A discipline eventually demands something from your mind. Political Science will ask you…
Signed Pavneet Singh
The most important part of yesterday’s student feedback was not that several UPSC questions appeared familiar. It was that aspirants preparing for 2027, who began this process only one month ago, could look at an actual Mains paper without fear and feel capable of constructing answers. That confidence came from completing subjects systematically, following the recommended source, using a multiple-reading model, prep…
Signed Pavneet Singh
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @PavneetSinghUPSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PavneetSinghUPSC” (@PavneetSinghUPSC), 13,797 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PavneetSinghUPSC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.