ᅠᅠ𝓒𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗜 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿/𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻: O1: @searchfriend_cf О2:@SearchNewFriends О3: — О4: — О5: —

Channel
ㅤㅤinfo
@PathogenInfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003946975208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PathogenInfo |
| Created | 20 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PathogenInfo |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 3 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3216.7%
- avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 96.5
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (20 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 772 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PathogenInfo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅠᅠ𝔀𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘂 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝗲 ?
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎁ᅠᅠ𝔀𝗵𝗼 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗲 🥹
- 🥹 𝓼𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 .52%
- ᅠᅠ🥹 𝓯𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗱 .13%
- 🥹 𝔀𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 .22%
- ᅠᅠ🥹 𝓱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 .13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Sticker, posted without a caption
ESTP'𝟴𝘄𝟵 𝓪𝗺𝗯𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁 | 𝓮𝗜𝗘 | `` 𝓼𝗼𝟴 𝓼𝗼/𝓼𝘅 `` 𝓪𝗻𝘅𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀-𝓲𝗻𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗱-𝓪𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 · · 𝓭𝗡𝗜 ⇋ 𝓶𝘆 𝗙𝗗𝘀 𝓸𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻? 𝓣𝗶𝗸 𝘁𝗼𝗸
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @PathogenInfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🎁ᅠᅠ𝔀𝗵𝗼 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗲 🥹
- 🥹 𝓼𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 .52%
- ᅠᅠ🥹 𝓯𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗱 .13%
- 🥹 𝔀𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 .22%
- ᅠᅠ🥹 𝓱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 .13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,075,810 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ㅤㅤinfo” (@PathogenInfo), 3 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PathogenInfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.