Channel
@Passim_Pay
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,281subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001878924942 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Passim_Pay |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Passim_Pay |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 1,281 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 1,280 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 1,279 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 1,281 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 1,280 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 1,283 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 1,285 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 1,286 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 1,279 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 1,280 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 1,281 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,280 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 1,282 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,284 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 1,284 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
⚡️ Crypto payments, zero dev time Tasking your dev team with building a custom crypto checkout takes weeks. They have better things to do than reinvent payment interfaces. 👨🏻💻 Designing a checkout from scratch means handling caches, managing states, and drawing UI components. It drains resources from your core product. You can skip that entirely with a simple redirect integration. Just place a payment button on y…
📊 Predictable Revenue in a Volatile Market: PassimPay Auto-Conversion You close a $5,000 deal on Friday in Bitcoin. Over the weekend, the market drops. By Monday morning, that payment is worth $4,500. You delivered the product, but the market kept your margin. 🎢 The cost of volatility Crypto payments open up global markets, but storing those assets is a massive financial risk. Your business runs on fixed expenses. …
Stop forcing your users to copy-paste new crypto addresses. It is killing your conversion rate. ⏳ Every time a user generates a new 34-character string, they hesitate. Switching apps, checking networks, and verifying digits adds friction. Every extra step is a reason to abandon the payment. 👀 Standard checkouts create a new address for every transaction. If a user accidentally sends funds to yesterday's address, th…
🔥 You're burning $14,400 a year on USDT TRC20 fees. Paying $4 for every transfer from a cold wallet may not look like much. But at just 10 transactions a day, the numbers add up fast: 🔻 $40 per day 🔻 $1,200 per month 🔻 $14,400 per year TRC20 transfers require network resources, and high network activity keeps transaction costs elevated. For businesses processing payouts every day, these fees quickly become a real …
💼 Most businesses still send crypto payouts one address at a time, same as five years ago. For 5 people that's 20 minutes. For 50, half a day. For 200 affiliates, it's someone's full-time job, and every manual transfer is a chance to send the wrong address into a transaction you can't undo. 🙅🏻♂️ That's not a niche problem. It's just how crypto payroll and affiliate payouts still get done at most companies. 💸 Pas…
🙅🏻♂️ Stop losing accounts to exchange freezes CEX (centralized exchange) platforms, the big trading exchanges most people use to buy and sell crypto, are great if you're a trader. But if you're running a business, they're the wrong tool. 👨🏼💻 Here's what actually happens when you try to use a CEX for operations: You need to pay 50 people. You do it one by one. Then your account gets flagged. A proof-of-funds requ…
🧡 A while back we posted about our global conference tour. This time we're showing the people behind it. 💬 We asked the team to share their biggest takeaways from the conferences they hit during the first half of 2026.
🎒PassimPay's H1 2026 Global Tour: Beyond Networking Over the past six months, the PassimPay team put thousands of miles on the road to meet merchants and partners face to face. That's still the fastest way to build real trust in B2B. We collected feedback, walked partners through the platform's latest updates, and showed how our crypto payment gateway fits into their business infrastructure. 🌍 Here's where we show…
☺ PassimPay just got listed on TON App! We joined TON Apps, the directory where Web3 projects and Telegram tools get discovered. Our multi-chain gateway now supports the TON community too, so you can accept $GRAM and 74+ other coins. 🏆 If you've got a minute, an upvote helps a lot, it's how we climb the rankings and get in front of more companies. 🗳 Check out the listing and vote for us on TON App!
🌟 Rate PassimPay on G2 You might already know us from Trustpilot, where merchants share their experiences with PassimPay. We’re also growing our presence on G2, and we’d love to hear your honest feedback there as well. Your insights help us grow and build a better platform for everyone. ⚡️ Share your honest feedback!
🇬🇪 See you soon at G GATE CONF 2026! 📩 DM us if you want to meet: → Egor Frolov, Chief Sales Officer (@PassimpaySM) → Sergey Krotov, Head of Sales (@sergey_passimpay) → Irina Frolova, Sales Manager (@passimpay_irina)
☺️ $SKR is officially supported on PassimPay! We've added $SKR, the native token of the Seeker | Solana Mobile ecosystem, as a payment method. Our clients are already taking and settling payments in it. ⭐️ Why it matters Solana has become one of the main rails for crypto payments. Stablecoin volume on it jumped 755% over the past year and hit a record $650 billion in February 2026. The Seeker crowd is the kind yo…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Passim_Pay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PassimPay.io” (@Passim_Pay), 1,281 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Passim_Pay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.