Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PᴀshᴀShᴏw 🅦

Channel

PᴀshᴀShᴏw 🅦

@PashaShow

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001880005239
TypeChannel
Username@PashaShow
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/PashaShow

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

136153144.57 August 2026 — 140 subscribers8 August 2026 — 140 subscribers14 August 2026 — 136 subscribers20 August 2026 — 138 subscribers28 August 2026 — 145 subscribers5 September 2026 — 148 subscribers13 September 2026 — 153 subscribers27 September 2026 — 152 subscribers7 October 2026 — 153 subscribers7 August 20267 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 61 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 12:55153+1
27 Sept 2026, 02:20152-1
13 Sept 2026, 15:56153+5
5 Sept 2026, 20:36148+3
28 Aug 2026, 03:07145+7
20 Aug 2026, 23:17138+2
14 Aug 2026, 13:34136-4
8 Aug 2026, 22:31140no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:31140first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1959.4%
🔥928.1%
custom 521303318563341564926.25%
❤‍🔥26.25%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PashaShow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Видео на завтра готово!🔥 Ждите в 14:00 по КВ 👀 Спокойной ночи ❤️

❤2

8 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC10 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я хочу снять что-нибудь на завтра, пожелайте мне удачи 🔥

🔥2❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC15 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🔄 Насчёт A/B тестирования добавлю: Можно использовать только одно «A/B Тестирование», либо превью, либо название. Берите превью‼️ 💡Сначала протестируйте два варианта, потом смотрите и всё. Моё мнение стоит на том, что превьюшка будет лучшим вариком!🔥

❤2

7 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ВСЁ!!!! ВИДЕО МОЖНО СМОТРЕТЬ. ‼️Я ВСЁ ИСПРАВИЛ!‼️ Извините за временные неудобства. Ссылка теперь работает и сейчас премьера.

🔥2❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😱 Я ЗНАЛ ДАТУ РЕЛИЗА ИГРЫ ПРО ПОБЕГ ОТ ЧУНГА-ЧАНГА!🔥 👀 Видео уже вышло на YouTube!⬇️ 🔥 Смотреть: https://youtu.be/zS90nAHzMpY?si=cqj_ir-pT4rIKybx Не думал, что мой анализ будет настолько точным, вы просто гляньте! Поддержите видео, поставьте лайк и напишите комментарий ❤️

❤2

7 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC16 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Что я могу сказать в общем про тест-превью для видосов?⬇️ ‼️Всегда делайте три превьюшки и запускайте A/B тестирование, — это лучшее, что можно сделать. Это уже третий раз я проверяю. Поэтому с уверенностью могу сказать, что ЭТО РЕАЛЬНО РАБОТАЕТ! используйте эту функцию и вы увидите разницу, между обычной загрузкой и этим тестированием. Там ещё можно использовать "тест-названия", это я протестирую в сегодняшнем, …

❤2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC14 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

АБАЛДЕТЬ МОЖНО!!👀 Актив только растёт! Ждите завтра новый видос в 14:00!🔥🔥🔥 Вот это я понимаю!! СПАСИБО ❤️

🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC10 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @StickersEscapeFromBloggerFile

👻 Невидимый Холибам мод‼️ ⚡️Превью, авы - @DesignByPasha #скачатьмодынапобеготблогера #скачать_моды_на_побег_от_блогера #побеготблогера #побег_от_блогера

custom 52130331856334156492

6 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📷ДЕЛАЮ ПРЕВЬЮ ДЛЯ YouTube!📷 Хочешь больше просмотров? Я сделаю тебе кликабельное превью👇 ✅ 2 варианта на выбор 👀 Современный стиль 🪙 Цена: 150 грн 🎯 Первому клиенту — 75 грн ✉️ Пиши в ЛС: @PashaPotuzhnenko

❤3

6 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот это я понимаю 🔥🔥🔥 Активчик то, что надо! Спасибо вам всем ❤️ Я уже думаю над новым видосом)

❤3

5 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хах, старый видос в ТТ решил спустя миллион лет залететь в реки 👀 Видос про «Первое слово съела корова», где мы с нашим стар.участник. чата включили фантазию и продолжили эти поговорки дальше 🔥 🌐 Смотреть: https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4H5sxem/ Видос 2024 года, 16 сентября Уже целых 180 ЧЕЛОВЕК добавили этот видос в избранное 😳 Всем спокойной ночи ❤️

❤2🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC21 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👀 ВОТ ЭТО СТАТИСТИКА!🔥 Почти на 100 просмотров больше, чем обычно набирают видео за такое время. А я напомню, прошло лишь 3 часа от выхода!⚡️ Спасибо вам за поддержку ❤️ Не зря я решился выпустить именно сегодня, а не послезавтра, словил волну актива и идеально в неё попал, загрузив видос 💡

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @PashaShow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PᴀshᴀShᴏw 🅦” (@PashaShow), 153 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PashaShow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.