Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Parure Atelier

Channel

Parure Atelier

@Parure

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

31,022subscribers

+328 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001417601255
TypeChannel
Username@Parure
DescriptionЮВЕЛИРНОЕ АТЕЛЬЕ | 𝐽𝑒𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑟𝑦 По всем вопросам пишите: 💎СПб и регионы РФ @parure_manager 💎МСК @Parure_MSK2 💎Дубай @Parure_Dubai 💎Казахстан @parure_manager_almaty Сайт: parure-at.ru Номер заявления на регистрацию в перечне РКН: № 6984261443
Created10 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Parure

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,68531,02330,8546 August 2026 — 30,694 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,694 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,701 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,697 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,693 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,685 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,686 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,725 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,763 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,778 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,795 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,780 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,775 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,750 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,737 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,738 subscribers23 August 2026 — 30,805 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,853 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,866 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,907 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,925 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,956 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,959 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,964 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,989 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,980 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,023 subscribers4 September 2026 — 31,019 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,013 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30,968 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,945 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,919 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,904 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,939 subscribers27 September 2026 — 31,022 subscribers31,0226 August 202627 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 52 days, net +328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,634–31,074 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 12:5631,022+83
17 Sept 2026, 15:2230,939+35
15 Sept 2026, 13:0130,904-15
13 Sept 2026, 20:3830,919-26
12 Sept 2026, 03:3730,945-23
9 Sept 2026, 22:3630,968-45
6 Sept 2026, 18:1831,013-6
4 Sept 2026, 05:1931,019-4
2 Sept 2026, 20:5431,023+43
1 Sept 2026, 18:0530,980-9
31 Aug 2026, 17:0630,989+25
30 Aug 2026, 14:2530,964+5
29 Aug 2026, 16:1230,959+3
28 Aug 2026, 19:4430,956+31
27 Aug 2026, 17:4730,925+18
26 Aug 2026, 19:3330,907+41
25 Aug 2026, 19:1730,866+13
24 Aug 2026, 21:1430,853+48
23 Aug 2026, 08:5830,805+67
21 Aug 2026, 20:1430,738first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 31,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,360
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026
Posts held94 (30 July 2026 – 3 October 2026)
Views total117,479
Reactions total2,209
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Oct 2026, 14:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,170
Videos
≈2,400
Links
≈634

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 23s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,722 reactions across 92 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,97952.1%
🔥94416.5%
❤‍🔥63411.1%
👍4287.48%
🤩2394.18%
😍2033.55%
🥰1592.78%
👏851.49%
😁480.839%
🎉30.052%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,722 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2026, 14:34 UTC349 views12 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

Наш любимый камень покорил Джей Ло и модное шоу в Милане! А вот чего вы не знали о нём... 🤫

❤9🥰3

2 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,830 views29 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

Лазурная бирюза, бриллианты и нежно-голубые топазы: эффектное сочетание оттенков в кольце Parure Atelier, представленном в бутике в Дубае! Дополнительное преимущество — международная доставка: украшения из Дубая можно отправить по всему миру. 🥛Кольцо с бирюзой 9.49 карат, детали и дополнительные фото отправит @parure_manager #dubai_parure 💡 Если плохо грузятся посты — читайте нас в МАХ.

❤22👍4🥰3

1 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,410 views64 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

🥛Бриллиант «эмеральд» 3.26 карат Fancy Intense Pink/IF, сертификат у @parure_manager #камни_parure 💡 Если плохо грузятся посты — читайте нас в МАХ.

❤51❤‍🔥7👍5🥰1

1 Oct 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,410 views55 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

Облагороженные розовые природные бриллианты доступнее, и в этом их преимущество. При этом не из каждого природного бриллианта получится розовый, что тоже придаёт им эксклюзивность. Напишите нам, и мы подберём розовый бриллиант под ваш бюджет. #камни_parure 💡 Если плохо грузятся посты — читайте нас в МАХ.

❤46👍8🥰1

30 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC≈2,810 views42 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

📰💫💍💎💎💎 Фантастика, да и только: Юлия Снигирь в Parure Atelier ✨ Заметили украшения Юлии Снигирь на премьере сериала «Полдень»? Да, это творения наших талантливых ювелиров. На Юлии было кольцо с лавандовым сапфиром 9,82 кт. Природный оттенок цейлонского камня подчеркивают «груши», «маркизы» и старинная огранка «роза». К роскошному кольцу как нельзя лучше подошли бриллиантовые серьги-шандельеры. Научно-фантастически…

❤24👍10🔥5❤‍🔥2🥰1

29 Sept 2026, 14:05 UTC≈2,970 views91 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

Впечатляющая новинка Parure Atelier - кольцо с крупным изумрудом, добытым на Урале! Изумруд «октагон» 19.07 карат обладает ярким интенсивным цветом, характерным для уральских камней премиального сегмента. 🥛Кольцо с уральским изумрудом 19.07 карат, сертификат GRS и подробности отправит @parure_manager #шоурум_parure 💡 Если плохо грузятся посты — читайте нас в МАХ.

❤55❤‍🔥18🤩12👍5🥰1

28 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈3,040 views67 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

🥛Рубеллит «груша» vivid pink 26.94 карат, сертификат и подробности у @parure_manager #камни_parure

❤54👍9❤‍🔥3🥰1

28 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC≈3,160 views60 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

🗣🤔💎💎💎🔅 Флоренс Пью на премьере «К востоку от рая»🌹 ❤️Актриса сыграла роль Кэти Эймс — одного из самых противоречивых персонажей американской литературы. И чтобы подчеркнуть драматичность образа, Флоренс вышла на красную дорожку в чёрном платье Rodarte и чувственном колье. ❤️На первый взгляд камень кажется рубином. Но, как мы с вами знаем, рубины подобного размера и качества — большая редкость. И логика не подводит…

🔥31❤17🥰7👍5

27 Sept 2026, 14:30 UTC≈3,400 views39 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

🗣🤔💎💎💎🔅 Ожерелье королевы Египта, которое мы больше никогда не увидим... Почему? Ответ — в ролике 👀💎 #ювелирные_истории 💡 Если плохо грузятся посты — читайте нас в МАХ.

❤22❤‍🔥10😁4🔥2👍1

26 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,650 views71 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

С драгоценными камнями редкой формы «маркиз» получаются невероятно красивые украшения: от удлиненных пропорций в сочетании с ослепительным блеском граней невозможно отвести взгляд! В кольце Parure Atelier сверкает дуэт из коллекционного розового бриллианта и бесцветного бриллианта с эталонным цветом D. 🥛Кольцо с бриллиантами «маркиз» 1.01 карат Fancy Intense Pinkish Purple и 1 карат D/VVS, сертификаты и подробности…

❤38❤‍🔥11😍9👍6🔥4🥰2🤩1

25 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTC≈3,610 views17 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Poll

Какой эскиз Parure Atelier нравится вам?

  1. 134%
  2. 236%
  3. 336%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😍14🤩3

25 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈3,710 views49 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

Изумруды-трапиче радуют неповторимым узором углистых соединений, подобное сырье добывают в небольшом количестве в Колумбии. Необычное название трапиче получили из-за сходства с устройством для измельчения сахара, популярного в Латинской Америке в XIX веке. Колумбийский изумруд 7.59 карат обладает ярко-зеленым оттенком и минимальным облагораживанием по шкале лаборатории GRS. 🥛Изумруд-трапиче 7.59 карат, сертификат …

❤30😍9👍5🔥4🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @Parure. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Parure edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 September 2026

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTCAnonymous Poll456 voters

Какой эскиз Parure Atelier нравится вам?

  1. 134%
  2. 236%
  3. 336%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Poll562 voters

Ваш выбор?

  1. 🥛Изумруды58%
  2. 🥛Сапфиры45%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTCAnonymous Poll630 voters

Какой эскиз нравится вам?

  1. 113%
  2. 229%
  3. 320%
  4. 452%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Poll415 voters

Какой эскиз нравится вам?

  1. 139%
  2. 239%
  3. 327%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz621 voters

На фермах моллюскам подсаживают песчинку, пластик или червяка, чтобы вырастить жемчуг?

  1. Правда76%
  2. Миф24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz503 voters

До XX века помолвочные кольца были в основном не с бриллиантами?

  1. Правда79%
  2. Миф21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Parure Atelier” (@Parure), 31,022 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Parure.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.