Channel
@ParseWinApp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,508subscribers
+103 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003136793233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ParseWinApp |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ParseWinApp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 2,508 | +18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 2,490 | +30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 2,460 | +19 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 2,441 | +13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 2,428 | +22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 2,406 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 2,405 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 2,405 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
69 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 52 | 75.4% | |
| 🥱 | 10 | 14.5% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 8.70% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💉Не можем пройти мимо хайпа вокруг боя Макгрегора и Холлоуэя. Львиная доля крупных ставок действительно пришлась именно на победу Макгрегора. Собрали самые сочные — все показать не позволяет формат Telegram. Отдельный гений зарядил $1,6 млн на тотал больше 2,5 раундов. Казалось бы, подстраховался максимально хитро — но бой закончился раньше, и не зашла даже эта ставка. @ParseWinFree_bot — следить за крупными ставк…
🤯6👍3
🔎Из-за лимитов Telegram на сообщения от ботов мы объединили часть уведомлений о новых ставках. Иначе некоторые сигналы могли бы просто не дойти до вас. Протестировать: @ParseWinFree_bot
👍6
💥Бесплатная версия нашего парсера (пока только парсинг крупных ставок с Stake, BCGame и Shuffle): @ParseWinFree_bot
👍5
3️⃣ Сегодня пользователи нашего парсера увидели настоящую классику грязного cпорта! $160,000 на Нигерию в матче против Гвинеи — сборной, у которой в открытых источниках годами всплывают проблемы с выплатой премий игрокам. Речь там не про миллионы, а про жалкие $1,500. А дальше — камбэк в 4-й четверти после -8. Совпадение? Конечно. Как всегда. Поздравляю всех клиентов. Лёгкие деньги не каждый день, но сегодня они б…
👍7🥱5
3️⃣ Пока вы думаете, наши клиенты ловят очевидные 322 в лайве. Прематчем упал весь Китай (что тоже было видно по парсеру), потом в лайве вот такая крупная ставка залетела по Stake. Поздравляю пользователей нашего парсера с легким профитом!
👍8🥱1
Все уже успели заработать по парсеру на китайской квале?
👍1
Вот для чего нужны кластеры. Казалась бы, обычная ставка на футбол в 1к баксов никого не удивит. А если я вам скажу, что там таких ставок несколько и 100% ставок висит именно в тотал в первом тайме? По итогу, легкий заход.
🔄 Stake Pulse — UPDATE • ⚽ Футбол 🟢 LIVE (0 - 0) 🌍 2Nd Division ⚔️ Me Kong Can Tho — Дак Лак ⏰ 1м 28с → 7 ставок → $20,977 🧾 Кэф: 2.00 🎯 Кластер: 100% → Me Kong Can Tho (0.5) (Гандикап) 7 → Me Kong Can Tho (0.5) — $20,977 Ставки: • $8,001 @ 2.00 • $3,118 @ 2.00 • $3,118 @ 2.00 • $1,849 @ 2.00 • $1,777 @ 2.00 • $1,680 @ 2.00 • $1,434 @ 2.00
Расширяемся! +2 китайские БК к парсингу. Сейчас заняты созданием бесплатных функций. https://parsewin.com
👍14🥱2
🚀 Stake Pulse — ловим инсайдеров на Stake Ловим момент, когда 10–30 инсайдеров в короткий промежуток времени синхронно ставят на один исход. Алерт прилетает в Telegram и на сайт до того, как кэф сдвинется. Что поймали за неделю: 🏏 Nepal A vs США (cricket, региональная серия которую почти никто не смотрит) 13 инсайдеров одновременно ставят на Непал, кэф 1.98, $36K Итог: Непал 264, США 257. Зашло ✅ 🏏 Guernsey vs Sw…
👍4🥱2🤬1
🇨🇳 RAYBET третий парсер в ParseWin 🔎 Радар прогрузов ловит движение раньше, чем оно доходит до наших контор. Сотни маркетов на матч, история движений по каждому, live и прематч в реальном времени. 🔥 На внутреннем тесте уже словили два сочных прогруза на Uwinks (LJL): vs RAYN Clocks, лили намвсю игру (3.10 → 2.08, −32.9% на момент скрина) → Uwinks взяли 2:0 ✅ vs Rising Gaming, дроп на первую карту (3.10 → 2.08, −32…
👍4
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ParseWinApp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 405,504 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ParseWin” (@ParseWinApp), 2,508 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ParseWinApp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.