Channel
@ParentsAgainstMasks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001763293896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ParentsAgainstMasks |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 25 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ParentsAgainstMasks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 9 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 9 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Blast from the past. It stills seems like a bad dream, the enormous prank they pulled on the world. But they pulled it off. Medical tyranny. A skit / prank at a mall in Russia (?). #mind_control
Like trying to stop a mosquito with a soccer goal net.
Photo, posted without a caption
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-02-05-covid-masks-no-protection-british-government-finds.html
Fauci just admitted to Congress that social distancing rule was made up.
US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin We can sleep better knowing that war and peace is in the hands of sane people.
Photo, posted without a caption
https://off-guardian.org/2023/09/05/fauci-just-admitted-masks-dont-work-but-why/ Masks are on the rise again, but this time the establishment seem to be seeding controversy. .
Tom Woods: Just the other day Anthony Fauci was subjected to a pretty convincing takedown of the usefulness of masks -- on of all places CNN. Host Michael Smerconish may be right of center, but all the same this is not where Fauci expected to be confronted. With masking making a modest return and rumors of more to come, the subject came up between the two men. Here's how it went: Smerconish: The data concludes th…
Photo, posted without a caption
https://www.conservativereview.com/horowitz-your-mask-harms-my-baby-2657148419.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11982039/Face-masks-raise-risk-stillbirths-testicular-issues-cognitive-decline-study-says.html Mainstream news #fertility #brain
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ParentsAgainstMasks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Parents Against Masks” (@ParentsAgainstMasks), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ParentsAgainstMasks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.