Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Parallax Markets |تحلیل بازار های مالی

Channel

Parallax Markets |تحلیل بازار های مالی

@ParallaxMarkets

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

357subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003081739819
TypeChannel
Username@ParallaxMarkets
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ParallaxMarkets

Growth

3553573567 August 2026 — 355 subscribers8 August 2026 — 356 subscribers8 August 2026 — 356 subscribers16 August 2026 — 357 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 355–357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:14357+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:45356no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:36356+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:32355first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

220 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13059.1%
🔥3415.5%
👍2913.2%
👏156.82%
👎20.909%
😢20.909%
🤔20.909%
🤷‍♂20.909%
👀10.455%
👨‍💻10.455%
😁10.455%
🙏10.455%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC270 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

دوستان برحسب اتفاق اینجا کسی که به نرم افزار اسکچاپ تسلط داشته باشه هست ؟

👍3🤷‍♂2👀1👨‍💻1

6 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC284 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⭕️ در این مدت با تحلیل های زیادی در کنار شما بودم بعد از مدتی وقفه و استراحت به فعالیت بازخواهم گشت.

22👎2😢2🙏1

5 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC318 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

10🔥2

5 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC319 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

9🔥1😁1

5 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC314 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

9🔥3

5 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC300 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#EURUSD یورو هم در ادامه تحلیل قبل هست و ادامه میدیم

6🔥2👏1

5 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC293 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#US30 در ادامه تحلیل قبل ATH پس روند همچنان صعودی میمونه و سطوح کمی به روز شد در یک هندسه کوچک نزولی که بیشتر برای پیدا کردن سطوح مناسب برای بای هست اعداد مشخص شد که نقضش زدن بالای جدید هست پس بیاد پایین تا برای بای و تارگتهای مشخص شده مناسب بشه همراهی میکنیم با مارکت و مقابلش نمی ایستیم روند همچنان صعودی هست

4🔥4👍3👏1

1 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC368 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

داو دقیقا با کف سازی و اسپایک نزولی برای هانت بایر ها سقف جدید زد امروز خبر بیاد بعد دنبال میکنم ازی دلار پارالاکس داریم فعلا صبر با ذهنیت بای که ممکنه با خبر نود تارگت بالا رو بزنه و بریزه یورو ۱.۱۳۵۷ تا ۱.۱۴۰۱ محدوده مهمی هست ببینیم خبر چکار میکنه پارالاکس داره و نود ها رو قبلا گفتم میتونه بزنه و ریورس کنه پس با مومنتوم خبر ترید نکنیم هفته سختی بود امیدوارم بعد خبر جبران بشه

7

1 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC325 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

چارت گذاشتم چرا دیده نمیشه ؟

👏12🔥4🤔2

1 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC316 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

آزی دلار ستاپ بای داریم اگر تایید بده من داو رو دنبال میکنم

👍83

1 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC288 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

داو از اینجا بره برای فلگ من راضی هستم 😂 52250 Oanda تارگتها مشخص خطوط قرمز فاینال فلگ هستند

10🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ParallaxMarkets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 453,101 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Parallax Markets |تحلیل بازار های مالی” (@ParallaxMarkets), 357 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ParallaxMarkets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.