Channel
@ParadigmChangeAso
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,174subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001816273178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ParadigmChangeAso |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ParadigmChangeAso |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 2,174 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 2,179 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 2,185 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 2,188 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:25 | 2,192 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2,193 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
493 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 209 | 42.4% | |
| 👍 | 187 | 37.9% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 5.68% | |
| 😐 | 15 | 3.04% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 2.84% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 2.43% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 1.62% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.22% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.01% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.406% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.406% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.406% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.203% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.203% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.203% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2024 to 4 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/hamster_kombat_Bot/start?startapp=kentId1771207866 Play with me, become cryptoexchange CEO and get a token airdrop! 💸 2k Coins as a first-time gift 🔥 25k Coins if you have Telegram Premium
👎8👍3😁2❤1
زندگی پيکار نيست، بازی است. زيرا آنچه آدمی بکارد همان را درو خواهد کرد، چه خوب، چه بد - قوه تخيل در بازی زندگی نقشی عمده دارد. برای پيروزی در بازی زندگی .. بايد قوه تخيل را آموزش دهيم که تنها نيکی را در ذهن تصوير کند. زيرا آنچه آدمی عميقاً در خيال خود احساس کند يا در تخليش به روشنی مجسم نمايد بر ذهن نيمههشيار(ضمير ناخودآگاه) اثر ميگذارد و موبهمو در صحنه زندگیاش ظاهر ميشود. تخيل را قيچی ذهن خواندهاند. اين قيچی شبا…
👍11❤7
Video, posted without a caption
❤26🥰5🤣1
مثالهایی ظریف از داشتن باورهای محدود کننده درباره ی پول که ورود ثروت را در زندگیتان محدود میکند : ۱. همه تلاشها یا زحمات روزمره خود را دائما به رایگان در اختیار بقیه میگذارید و در برابر گرفتن پول از دیگران حس بد و گناه دارید ۲. پولدارها را انسانهای بدی میبینید که با روشهای غیر انسانی به جایگاهشان رسیده اند و تا بحث پول میشود، اولین مثالها یا افکاری که به زبان و ذهنتان می آید، بیشتر عده ای هستند که با دزدی و…پول…
👍21❤15
اگر نتوانید مهارت لذت بردن از هر آنچه را که در زندگی دارید در خودتان ایجاد کنید، مطمئن باشید با بیشتر به دست آوردن هر چیز، هرگز خوشحال تر نخواهید شد. #باربارا_دی_آنجلیس
❤19👍9
وقتی نمیخوای قبول کنی که بزرگترین دشمنت خودتی...
😁6👍5🤯5🤣2❤1
گردنتو خم میکنی به مهرههاا فشار میاد...
👍7
هممون یه رفیق اینچنینی داریم😂 #فان
😁16👍6❤1🥰1
چیزی که از شما میخواهم این است که: برای انسان شدن دانشآموزان تلاش کنید و تلاش شما موجب تربیت «جانورانِ دانشمند» و «بیماران روانیِ ماهر» نشود. خواندن، نوشتن، ریاضیات و... زمانی اهمیت پیدا میکند که به انسان شدن کودکان کمک کنيد و اين كليد انسان بودن كودكان در آينده میباشد. پزشک شدن، مهندس شدن، متخصص شدن، كار سختی نيست و میشود با چند سال درس خواندن به آن رسيد و چه بسا امروز ما در جامعه هم پزشكان زیادی داريم و هم مه…
❤28👍11🔥1
😂😂
❤13🤣9
جهان بازتابی از خود شماست اگر خود را از درون دوست بداريد و به خود مهر بورزيد و ارج و ارزش نهيد در زندگی بيرونی نيز همين حالات اشكار خواهد شد. اگر طالب عشق بيشتری هستيد به خود عشق بورزيد، اگر خواهان پذيرفته شدن هستيد خود را بپذيريد و اگر از اعماق وجودتان خود را محترم شماريد همان سطح احترام را از هستی فراخواهيد خواند ... 📕 #نیمه_تاریک_وجود ✍🏻 #دبی_فورد
👍29❤10🔥2
بهش فکر کن 🧠
❤18👍9😐4👌2👎2🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ParadigmChangeAso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PARADIGM CHANGE” (@ParadigmChangeAso), 2,174 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ParadigmChangeAso.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.