3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–53 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 06:02
52
-1
29 Sept 2026, 14:22
53
no change
29 Sept 2026, 13:47
53
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 18 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
264.2%
avg views ÷ 52 subscribers
Avg views / post
137
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
12 (18 September 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
1,374
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 2 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
7
53.8%
❤
3
23.1%
⚡
1
7.69%
🎉
1
7.69%
🤩
1
7.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
For those discovering Pans for the first time, here’s what we’re actually building.
Pans is building an onchain ecosystem where tokenized stocks, crypto, rewards, routing, and privacy work together in one platform.
The vision goes beyond simply holding $PANS and receiving rewards.
01. Stock Rewards
Eligible $PANS holders are designed to receive rewards backed by protocol-generated revenue and choose which supporte…
Pans Phase 2A Update
We’ve built the foundation for non-custodial routing on Robinhood Chain Mainnet, including server-side 0x integration, wallet-signed transaction flows, and on-chain receipt checks.
Our first live pricing request reached 0x, but the tested Stock Token route is currently restricted for legal reasons. No trade has been executed, and routing is not live. We’ll continue validation once the applicabl…
Pons is building infrastructure for launching assets.
Pans is taking a different path:
building infrastructure for what users can do with assets after they exist onchain.
Our direction is clear:
Stock Rewards → Tokenized Stocks → Universal Asset Routing → Privacy Layer
The long-term vision is an environment where users can earn tokenized stocks, choose their exposure, move between stocks, crypto and stablecoins, …
We’re expanding the Pans vision beyond Stock Rewards.
The goal is to make moving between tokenized stocks and crypto feel as simple as using a modern financial app.
Stock ↔️ Stock
Stock ↔️ Crypto
Stock ↔️ Stablecoins
No traditional wallet connection.
No gas management.
No separate fee payment from the user.
Pans will abstract the complexity behind the interface while introducing privacy-preserving routing designe…
Pans takes inspiration from what Pons has built on Robinhood Chain.
The products are different. The architecture is different. The path is our own.
But the ambition is shared: build, ship, grow the ecosystem, and create something that lasts.
Pons has shown what focused execution can achieve. Pans is now beginning its own journey with Stock Rewards, Asset Routing, and onchain settlement at its core.
Different prod…
The thesis behind Pans is simple:
Tokenized equities shouldn’t stop at ownership. They should become programmable, composable assets across the onchain economy.
Pans is building a Stock Reward & Asset Routing Protocol on Robinhood Chain.
$PANS holders accrue reward allocations from protocol-generated revenue and choose which supported tokenized stock they want to receive.
Hold → Accrue → Select → Claim → Route
O…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @PansEcosystem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pans Ecosystem” (@PansEcosystem), 52 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PansEcosystem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.