International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 80 days, net -361. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,698–8,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 10:50
7,752
-3
26 Oct 2026, 01:08
7,755
-3
25 Oct 2026, 21:20
7,758
no change
25 Oct 2026, 19:10
7,758
-20
23 Oct 2026, 17:18
7,778
-5
23 Oct 2026, 05:50
7,783
no change
23 Oct 2026, 01:37
7,783
no change
22 Oct 2026, 20:31
7,783
-6
20 Oct 2026, 21:28
7,789
-4
20 Oct 2026, 13:59
7,793
-14
19 Oct 2026, 16:47
7,807
+1
19 Oct 2026, 06:22
7,806
-1
17 Oct 2026, 22:55
7,807
no change
17 Oct 2026, 17:00
7,807
-1
16 Oct 2026, 18:37
7,808
-7
15 Oct 2026, 02:51
7,815
-1
14 Oct 2026, 14:21
7,816
-3
13 Oct 2026, 21:37
7,819
-2
12 Oct 2026, 06:01
7,821
-1
11 Oct 2026, 03:02
7,822
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 7,752 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held
25 (7 June 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total
5,290
Reactions total
254
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Oct 2026, 06:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 49s
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,650 reactions across 25 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
493
29.9%
😡
228
13.8%
❤
208
12.6%
🤡
192
11.6%
🔥
84
5.09%
custom 5474634472492138610
77
4.67%
custom 5868476247616526132
70
4.24%
🤮
59
3.58%
😁
43
2.61%
💯
39
2.36%
❤🔥
38
2.30%
custom 5060128097878147976
15
0.909%
💔
14
0.848%
custom 6210562515772902561
13
0.788%
custom 5897512258057017970
10
0.606%
👏
10
0.606%
🥰
9
0.545%
🫡
9
0.545%
👍
6
0.364%
custom 6044308729791260901
5
0.303%
9 further kinds
28
1.70%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,650 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 25 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Palestine_Updates. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 7 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇮🇱/🇵🇸/🇵🇸/🌍 On this day 3 years ago, a small group of determined men, besieged for decades inside a tiny coastal enclave known as the Gaza Strip, broke through the walls that confined them and forever changed the course of history.
Operation Al-Aqsa Flood shattered the illusion of permanent occupation and unchallenged military supremacy, and initiated the beginning of the Zionist regime's downfall. What the world cal…
🚨🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸 Martyr Izz Al-Din Al-Qassam Brigades Spokesman Abu Obaida:
Three years have passed since the sacred crossing, the day when the arms of the men shattered the myth of the occupation’s security doctrine, once and for all. On that day, by the grace of Allah, no deterrence, no warning, and no capacity for a decisive win remained.
All glory and pride to the heroic leaders and soldiers of the great crossing, and to…
🚨🇵🇸🇵🇸 Martyr Izz Al-Din Al-Qassam Brigades:
October 7th....The Sacred Crossing.
Bless the young men marching amidst the clouds of the sky, coming as witnesses; they swept upon Zion like projectiles hurling fire that reaps a harvest of destruction.
The Anniversary
October 7th.
@Palestine_Updates
❗️🇸🇦/🇪🇬/🇹🇷/🇮🇱 After the announcement of a joint defense pact between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan, aimed at protecting Saudi Arabia from potential Iranian attacks by deterring Iran through two countries on its borders — Pakistan and Turkey — Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan met with his Saudi and Egyptian counterparts in El Alamein, Egypt, to discuss the new pact.
Is Saudi Arabia planning to bring a new all…
❗️🇮🇱/🇮🇷 NEW: Enemy Media:
"Trump and Netanyahu's call tonight is being described as the most important conversation for an Israeli Prime Minister ever."
@Palestine_Updates
🇮🇱😭/🇺🇸/🇮🇷 Enemy Media:
"We must speak the painful truth: Netanyahu has been much more besieged during Trump's term than he was during Biden's term."
@Palestine_Updates
❗️🇮🇱/🇺🇸/🇮🇷 Axios journalist Barak Ravid:
"My personal analysis from what I've heard from U.S. officials is that the United States will not assist Israel in any attack on Iran."
@Palestine_Updates
❗️🇮🇱/🇺🇸/🇮🇷 Israeli Channel 12 reports close associates of Trump stated:
"We're not going to become part of the developments in the Middle East."
@Palestine_Updates
😁30custom 547463447249213861011🤡2🥰2👎1
Signed A 🔻
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Palestine_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Palestine Updates 🇵🇸⚔️” (@Palestine_Updates), 7,752 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Palestine_Updates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
