Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Palace

@PalaceNFT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,583subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002342476062
TypeChannel
Username@PalaceNFT
DescriptionMarketplace for stickers @palacenftbot x.com/PalaceSticker @palacefather - CEO Support - @palacesup_bot All sticker purchases @palacedeals All sticker offers @palaceoffers
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PalaceNFT

Growth

20,58320,67520,6296 August 2026 — 20,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,672 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,654 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,643 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,625 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,604 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,591 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,583 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,569–20,689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:1720,583-8
12 Aug 2026, 01:3120,591-13
11 Aug 2026, 04:1220,604-21
10 Aug 2026, 01:0120,625-18
8 Aug 2026, 23:0120,643-11
8 Aug 2026, 02:1020,654-18
6 Aug 2026, 22:4220,672-3
6 Aug 2026, 09:3020,675no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:2320,675first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
80
Videos
3
Links
76

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,631 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
62438.3%
🔥51931.8%
👍48829.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,631reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Apr 2026, 21:14 UTC≈6,210 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Wow..) Less than 400 left 👀, just minute in!

20🔥5👍1

27 Apr 2026, 21:12 UTC≈6,430 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

PalaceFather feels boring… 🥱 Let’s have some fun) ❤️ 👉 he-he, boy

🔥155👍5

26 Dec 2025, 13:44 UTC≈16,100 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😂❤️ thx 1337 🫶 cast your vote - here 🐸 voting - here

58👍29🔥26

13 Nov 2025, 23:55 UTCviews —

Palace pinned «Ни в какие группы не нужно подавать заявки! 🏴 Берегите свои профили от потенциальных мошенников! 🪙 С любовью и уважением, Palace Team 🫶»

13 Nov 2025, 23:55 UTC≈20,600 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ни в какие группы не нужно подавать заявки! 🏴 Берегите свои профили от потенциальных мошенников! 🪙 С любовью и уважением, Palace Team 🫶

34🔥20👍14

13 Nov 2025, 23:11 UTCviews —

Palace pinned «🫶 Будьте предельно внимательны и осторожны, пока наблюдаем, что случилось с аккаунтом нашего СТО. 🐸 Не советуем переходить по подозрительным ссылкам. Оригинальный бот - @palacenftbot Оригинальный канал - @PalaceNFT CEO - @palacefather»

13 Nov 2025, 23:11 UTC≈18,400 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🫶 Будьте предельно внимательны и осторожны, пока наблюдаем, что случилось с аккаунтом нашего СТО. 🐸 Не советуем переходить по подозрительным ссылкам. Оригинальный бот - @palacenftbot Оригинальный канал - @PalaceNFT CEO - @palacefather

24👍12🔥9

6 Nov 2025, 16:17 UTC≈16,700 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Are you good a city holder? Because 🥇 and 🥈 City Holders are already on Palace 🪙 Become a good holder or get your chance to sell your sticker for a hot price 🔥 Trade on Palace 💸

🔥3622👍19

5 Nov 2025, 14:40 UTC≈12,500 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @palacedeals

➔ Pudgy Penguins x Kung Fu Panda purchase - Name: Dragon Warrior Po #5826 (supply 6000) - Cost: 13.80 TON ($26.56) #pudgy_penguins_x_kung_fu_panda ​

🔥2825👍14

5 Nov 2025, 14:15 UTC≈11,400 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💥 BOOOOM! We are ready with the most anticipated update of the Stickers ecosystem 👀 🏴 Palace & Goodies 🍬 is finally ready for all the users To send your stickers to Palace - just open our TMA and open My NFT page, where you will see your stickers and will be able to put them on sale with 1 button📱 Enjoy trading on Palace 💸

41🔥26👍25

31 Oct 2025, 21:41 UTC≈10,200 views256 reactionsread 12 August 2026

What if people can trade new gifts on Palace with the lowest commission? 🤔 Что если люди смогут торговать новыми подарками на Palace с САМОЙ НИЗКОЙ КОМИССИЕЙ НА РЫНКЕ? 🤔

👍11274🔥70

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PalaceNFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 21,276 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Palace” (@PalaceNFT), 20,583 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PalaceNFT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.