Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Paco channel

Channel

Paco channel

@Paco_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

44subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001468165171
TypeChannel
Username@Paco_channel
DescriptionSalve ragazzi,questo canale sarà usato per discutere degli argomenti che più mi aggradano(come i giochi/film/anime/serie tv/manga) -> @Paco909
Created19 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Paco_channel

Growth

447 August 2026 — 44 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43–45 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:0044no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5744first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.9%
avg views ÷ 44 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 April 20265 August 2026)
Views total50
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,410
Videos
657
Links
340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Marvel che non ha le palle di introdurre Silk e fare reali discorsi sulla natura uomo-ragno, eliminate MJ se significa eliminare la scrittura di spiderman

Signed Paco

5 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026

A volte mi chiedo perchè siano stati così stupidi da cancellare spiderman 4, gurda dove siamo finiti con questo supereroe, diventato un giocattolo nelle mani di persone che non hanno capito il personaggio

Signed Paco

5 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026

Ieri mi sono andato a vedere questa fantomatica rinascita di spiderman e non capisco che rinascita debba essere, praticamente ci sono sempre gli stessi problemi, battutine marveliane da ragazzini disabili, addirittura censurano battute sul cazzo o scene dove i personaggi dovrebbero essere nudi, gli eventi a schermo si susseguono alla velocità della luce avendo una banalità di fondo assurda, ma poi questo nuovo spider

Signed Paco

27 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ma quanto vogliono lucrare su shrek? Qualche nuovo film no?

Signed Paco

18 Jun 2026, 08:28 UTC43 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Per il resto godo che l'hanno reso canon, sono perfetti isieme

Signed Paco

18 Jun 2026, 08:27 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026

Mi sono finito anche final fantasy rebirth e mi sa che square enix ha fatto un abbonamento per i finali di merda per ogni capitolo di questo remake, ma com' è possibile che mi snaturi completamente un momento così emotivamente forte mettendomi in mezzo il caos più totale sballottando cloud a destra e manca come un pupazzo e rovinando per l'ennesima volta sephiroth facendolo diventare un sacco da box, non c'è stato mo

Signed Paco

17 Jun 2026, 11:40 UTC40 viewsread 10 August 2026

Spielberg penso abbia cacato uno dei film più brutti degli ultimi tempi, praticamente come non fare un film sci-fi

Signed Paco

17 Jun 2026, 07:02 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026

Boh, continua a non convincermi, il character design di alcuni personaggi mi sembra troppo giocattoloso, vedremo che combinano, l'hanno anche rimandato all'anno prossimo

Signed Paco

9 Jun 2026, 16:36 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026

Un nuovo xenoblade e il remake di zelda, godooo

Signed Paco

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Paco_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Paco channel” (@Paco_channel), 44 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Paco_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.