مصطفوی، عضو کمیسیون آموزش مجلس: هیچ تخلفی در روند تصحیح اوراق امتحانات نهایی صورت نگرفته و گزارش نشده است. بعضی تخلفات که در فضای مجازی اعلام شده شایعه است و صحت ندارد و اگر کسی مدعی چنین موضوعی است سند ارائه کند تا پیگیری کنیم. سطح سوالات امتحان نهایی دانشآموزان استانهای جنوبی همسطح سایر دانش آموزان بود و تفاوتی وجود نداشت. @paadarsapp

Channel
پادَرس
@PaadarsApp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,947subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001140251752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PaadarsApp |
| Created | Between 1 January 2017 and 30 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PaadarsApp |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 3,947 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 3,951 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 3,962 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 3,965 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 3,972 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 3,978 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 3,985 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 3,985 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.50%
- avg views ÷ 3,947 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 178
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.31%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,954 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 15s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 36.4% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 27.3% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 27.3% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
پنج دقیقه درس میخونم پنجاه و پنج دقیقه استراحت میکنم و متاسفانه به همین علت نمیتونم درسامو مثل اشتباهاتم تکرار و مرور کنم. 🐸 @paadarsapp
بنابر اعلام اداره کل آموزش و پرورش، نتایج آزمون ورودی مدارس سمپاد و نمونه دولتی تا روز دوشنبه ۱۲ مرداد اعلام می شود! @paadarsapp
علیرضا کاظمی، وزیر آموزش و پرورش در شرف استیضاح یا استعفای اجباری است اما هنوز خبری رسمی منتشر نشده. @paadarsapp
👎1👏1
هر وقت احساس بیمصرف بودن کردی، یادت باشه بیکی باتم، محلهی باب اسفنجی ته دریا یه آتشنشانی داشت. @paadarsap
👏3❤2
وقتی امتحان شیمی داشتی ولی دینی خوندی 😂 @paadarsap
الان یه کنکوری که باید به عنوان تاثیر گذارترین شخص اعلام بشه همه جوره پاره شدیم🫠 @paadarsapp
❤1👍1
عظیمیراد : وزیر آموزش و پرورش بیش از این پافشاری نکند و سلامت و آینده دانشآموزان عزیز را به خطر نیندازد! بخشی از شهرهای جنوب کشور آماج حملات دشمن آمریکایی قرار دارد و وقتی ترامپ جنایتکار منازل مسکونی را هدف قرار میدهد، آیا بمباران مدارس که قبلاً یکبار انجام داده، کار سختی برای او خواهد بود؟! آموزش و پرورش باید نسبت به این شکل برگزاری امتحانات، پاسخگو باشد! @paadarsapp
❤1👎1
اگه میخواین بدونین کیفیت زندگی، اضطراب، فشار و... چقدر روی زندگی تاثیر داره، باید بگم تام کروز و اکبر عبدی همسن بودن. @paadarsapp
❤1
نحوه تصحیح اوراق امتحانات نهایی : برگه شما در ابتدا توسط دو مصحح متفاوت تصحیح میشه، اگر اختلاف نمره تصحیح شده توسط این دو مصحح یک نمره یا کمتر از یک نمره باشه، میانگین نمرهای که اون دو نفر بهتون دادن به عنوان نمره نهاییتون ثبت میشه، و اگر این اختلاف بیشتر از یک نمره باشه، برگه توسط نفر سوم تصحیح میشه و هر نمرهای که نفر سوم بهتون بده میشه نمرهی شما در اون آزمون! @paadarsapp
من و برادر در آزمون سلامت و بهداشت 🗿 @paadarsapp
هشدار جدی آموزش و پرورش؛ دریافت وجه اجباری در مدارس غیرقانونی است معاون وزیر آموزش و پرورش با تأکید بر اینکه دریافت هرگونه وجه اجباری از خانوادهها در مدارس خلاف قوانین است، اعلام کرد که مشارکتهای مردمی باید کاملاً داوطلبانه انجام شود. @paadarsapp
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PaadarsApp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,063,791 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@PaadarsApp named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پادَرس” (@PaadarsApp), 3,947 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PaadarsApp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.