Channel
@PXLERA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,828subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001411655295 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PXLERA |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PXLERA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 1,828 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 1,833 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 1,834 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 1,834 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 598 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
23 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 87.0% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Let’s See What Your Dream Closet’s Aesthetic! توی پینترست عبارتی که پایین نوشته شده رو سرچ کن و اولین عکس از سمت راست، وایبی که قراره کمد لباس رویاییت داشته باشه رو بهت نشون میده. اگه خواستی نتیجه رو با ما هم به اشتراک بذار. روی جمله انگلیسی بزن تا خودش کپی بشه! Todays Script Is : dream closet aesthetic #Pintwist ، #William ˓ 资 ˒ @PXLERA
Signed . ı𓏺и wı𓏺ll
- پیشنهاد های این جمعه، برای جالب تر گذروندن هفته پیش روت. YouTube Pick : James Hoffman حتی اگر اهل قهوه نباشی، ویدیوهای جیمز هافمن نمونهی فوقالعادهای از آموزش باکیفیت و آرامشبخشن. بهت اطلاعاتی در مورد قهوه خوب میدن، از علم پشت اون قهوهها گرفته تا سفر به کارخانهها و آزمایشهای جالب، همهچیز با کیفیت سینمایی و روایت جذاب ساخته شده و بهت حس یاد گرفتن بدون خستگی رو میده. Music Mood : Tycho - Awake یه موسیقی بد…
❤1
Signed ego (GEMINI ver)
به بینیت اجازه بده که نشون بده جای هر حرف کجای کیبورده! "سلام دختری؟" #Noctis ، #Axen ˓ 资 ˒ @PXLERA
Signed ƶ 𝖺𝗑︎𝖾𝗇︎̶ . (estrella ver)
No One Is Born Evil , The World Shapes Them.
❤3💘1
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
- The Devourer تو هیچوقت از آدمها متنفر نبودی؛ فقط از این متنفر بودی که همیشه کمتر از چیزی باشن که ادعا میکنن.برای همین اگر ویلن میشدی، هیچ شهری رو آتیش نمیزدی، هیچ ارتشی هم نداشتی. تو خودِ احساسات آدمها رو میبلعیدی. عشق؟ اولین چیزی بود که ازشون میگرفتی. دلتنگی؟ محوش میکردی. وابستگی؟ از ریشه درمیآوردیش. چون باور داشتی تمام ضعفهای انسان از جایی شروع میشه که قلبش رو دست یکی دیگه میسپره.آدمهایی که از مقاب…
💘1😭1
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
- The Experiment تو هیچوقت به احساسات اعتماد نداشتی. از نگاه تو، عشق، وفاداری، نفرت و حتی انسانیت، فقط واکنشهای شیمیایی پیچیدهای بودن که آدمها اسمهای شاعرانه روشون گذاشته بودن.برای همین، دنیا برای تو یک آزمایشگاه بود. همه را زیر نظر میگرفتی؛ رفتارها، انتخابها، ترسها و دروغها. هر آدم فقط یک نمونهی آزمایش بود که باید نقطهی شکستش پیدا میشد. اما وقتی عاشق میشدی دیگه دنبال دوست داشته شدن نبودی، دنبال مالکیت …
❤1
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
- The Chapterless King تو هیچوقت دنبال نابود کردن دنیا نبودی؛ فقط دلت میخواست ازش خارج بشی. برای همین، هر بار که دنیا زیادی سنگین میشد، بین صفحههای کتابها پناه میگرفتی. جایی که پایانها معنی داشتن، آدمها دلیل کارهاشون رو میدونستن و حتی تاریکترین شبها هم بالاخره به آخرین فصل میرسیدن.اما اگر ویلن میشدی، یه روز کتاب رو میبستی. چون بالاخره میفهمیدی که زندگی واقعی، حتی از تلخترین رمانها هم پوچتره. توی کت…
❤1
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
- The Last Rebel تو از اون ویلنهایی نبودی که برای قدرت میجنگن؛ تو فقط یه روز از تحمل کردن خسته شدی. خسته از اینکه همیشه باید صبر کرد. صبر برای بهتر شدن شرایط، برای آروم شدن خونه، برای عوض شدن آدمها، برای رسیدن یه روزی که بالاخره بشه نفس کشید. اگر ویلن بودی، اولین چیزی که از دنیا میگرفتی «اجبار» بود. اجبار به تحمل کردن، اجبار به عادت کردن، اجبار به اینکه هر بار به خودت بگی: فقط یه کم دیگه. برای همین آدمها ازت می…
❤1
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
- The Gatekeeper تو از اون ویلنهایی نبودی که قلبشون از سنگ باشه؛ برعکس، مشکل دقیقاً این بود که زیادی برای آدمهای خودش ارزش قائل بود. تو حاضر بودی برای دوستات وقت بذاری، کنارشون باشی و بار خیلی از روزهای سختشون رو سبکتر کنی. اما هیچوقت حاضر نبودی به جای اونها زندگی کنی یا مسئول انتخابهاشون بشی. چون خوب میدونستی دوستی یعنی کنار هم راه رفتن، نه روی دوش هم.اگر ویلن بودی، قدرتت ساختن دیوار نبود؛ ساختن مرز بود. مرز…
❤2
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
- The Nameless One تو از اون ویلنهایی نبودی که دنبال قدرت باشن؛ دنبال جواب بودی. سؤالت این نبود که چطور دنیا رو تغییر بدی، سؤالت این بود که اصلاً چه چیزی به آدمها حق میده خودشون رو خاص بدونن. چه چیزی ما رو از بقیه موجودات جدا میکنه؟ اسمها؟ جایگاهها؟ قوانینی که خودمون ساختیم؟ اگر ویلن بودی، هویت آدمها رو هدف میگرفتی. نه برای اینکه نابودشون کنی، برای اینکه مجبورشون کنی از خودشون بپرسن: «اگر تمام چیزهایی که منو…
❤1
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
- The hunter تو از اون ویلنهایی نبودی که توی قصرهای تاریک بشینن و منتظر قهرمان بمونن.تو خودت دنبالشون میرفتی. برات دنیا پر از رازهای حلنشده بود؛ آدمهایی که چیزی رو پنهون کرده بودن، حقیقتهایی که زیر لایههای دروغ دفن شده بودن و هیولاهایی که خودشون رو شبیه آدمها جا زده بودن. اگر ویلن بودی، هیچوقت هدفت سلطه بر دنیا نبود. هدفت این بود که هیچ رازی زنده نمونه. هیچ دروغی فرصت نفس کشیدن نداشته باشه.برای تو اعتماد کرد…
❤1
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
- The Smiling Phantom از اون ویلنهایی که هیچکس هیچوقت نفهمید دقیقاً کی به تاریکی رسید. چون هیچوقت درباره دردش حرف نزد. آدمها فقط چیزهایی رو دیدن که دوست داشتی نشونشون بدی؛ علایقت، شوخیهات، لحظههای بامزه و چیزهایی که ازشون لذت میبردی. اما هیچکس نفهمید پشت اون تصویر، واقعاً چه خبر بوده.اگر ویلن بودی، قدرتت این نبود که شهرها رو ویران کنی؛ قدرتت این بود که هیچکس نتونه احساسات واقعیت رو بخونه. همیشه یه قدم از …
❤1
Signed ㅤ. öг aгabell𓏺a
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @PXLERA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 242,094 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖯𝖨𝖷𝖤𝖫” (@PXLERA), 1,828 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PXLERA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.