Channel
@PXDF888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002306561722 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PXDF888 |
| Created | 1 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PXDF888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 8 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 1 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 11 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀😀😀😀😀😀🥹🥹😀😀😀😀📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 ♾@ALLpayKK 国际支付集团 致力于通过技术创新，资源整合，立足支付界，面向全球，提供操作简单、安全可靠、方便快捷、利益共享的支付金融服务集团！我司的终极目标： 服务盘口，成就盘口！ 集团通过和多个国家的第三方支付及银行等机构深度合作 ，为您提供在线收付款。24H原生+唤醒+扫码+线下卡接upi等专户全类收量代付秒出，专业团队为您保驾护航。一站式接入东南亚地区等100+支付方式，ALLpay国际支付集团已经营6年。海外多国线上代收/代付直通车 ，原生通道和线下卡接。承接外币代收兑换U。秒回U, D0秒结算，秒下发，24小时在线客服，资金安全，稳定性高 。 ♾@ALLpayKK 主营业务： 😑一类：BC、红绿、综合盘、棋牌、Rummy、游戏 等盘口 成功率80+ 😑二类：资金长盘，现金贷、股票、交易所、24小时公户等盘口 成功率65+ …
🥰 阿里-国际支付🇮🇳您身边的支付专家 印度支付 印度代收 印度原生 印度唤醒 印度扫码 成功率70+ 印度代付 印度源头 接内充纯代付 原生代付😀回调 🥰 印度卡接 印度直通车 印度线下 印度upi 🥰 尼日利亚支付 菲律宾支付 巴西支付 印度支付 印尼支付 马来西亚支付 越南支付 泰国支付 菲律宾支付 哥伦比亚支付 土耳其支付 墨西哥支付 南非支付 埃及支付 孟加拉支付...（线上api线下卡接）🔥 🥰 阿里 国际支付-🇮🇳深耕支付领域多年，行业领军者，自营持牌 三方支付，为您线上线下收付款提供一站全方位服务，老牌公司专业稳定靠谱，源头实时承兑, 机器 人工客服24H在线 国际支付 频道： @pay028 国际唯一 商务： @pay002 阿里唯一 商务： @pay002 ✅ 查询快✅ 卸货快✅D0结算✅24H随时下发✅
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @PXDF888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PXDF888 named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧿PXDF880🧿PXDF88❤️貔·貅·代·发❤️99U/月·代·发·飞·机❤️” (@PXDF888), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PXDF888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.