SarrthiIAS 2028 batches 2,4,5,6, your class will start earlier, at 3:15, today. Informing here in case anyone missed the notification.
❤30👍6

Channel
@PSGeog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15,251subscribers
+1,730 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002097657998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PSGeog |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PSGeog |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:19 | 15,251 | +66 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 15,185 | +130 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:54 | 15,055 | +280 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:45 | 14,775 | +42 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 14,733 | +38 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:48 | 14,695 | +26 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 14,669 | +49 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 14,620 | +161 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 14,459 | +9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 14,450 | +9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:26 | 14,441 | +9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 14,432 | +10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 14,422 | +2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 14,420 | +13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 14,407 | +12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:05 | 14,395 | +15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 14,380 | +9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 14,371 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 14,372 | +7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 14,365 | first reading |
73 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 73 (20 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 242,500 |
| Reactions total | 953 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 05:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3,569 reactions across 70 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,315 | 64.9% | |
| 👍 | 326 | 9.13% | |
| 🤣 | 215 | 6.02% | |
| 😢 | 161 | 4.51% | |
| 😁 | 80 | 2.24% | |
| 🙏 | 69 | 1.93% | |
| 😭 | 60 | 1.68% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 1.57% | |
| 💔 | 49 | 1.37% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 1.06% | |
| 💊 | 34 | 0.953% | |
| 😱 | 26 | 0.728% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 0.616% | |
| 🐳 | 15 | 0.42% | |
| 🎉 | 11 | 0.308% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 0.28% | |
| 🆒 | 8 | 0.224% | |
| 😈 | 7 | 0.196% | |
| 😐 | 7 | 0.196% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.196% | |
| 19 further kinds | 53 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,569 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (11.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
SarrthiIAS 2028 batches 2,4,5,6, your class will start earlier, at 3:15, today. Informing here in case anyone missed the notification.
❤30👍6
So, as you all must know by now, mains results have come out. A big congratulations to the one who have cleared it! ✨ For those who couldn't, this is not the end. Take a break for a few days, take time to grieve a bit. That is essential. After this, assess your preparation of you want to give further attempts. Try to understand what went wrong. If you don't want to give any more attempts, explore other options. UPSC…
❤92🔥5💯3🙏2
@sarrthiias batches: there was a power cut. I will be back in a minute
👍39❤4
Next video in Mapping tidbits is on Deserts. Try to guess as many as you can!! Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfRxdiDMDw0/?mdxt=MWhoOTN1ZmVxZWZmNA== YT: https://youtube.com/shorts/vpuRd_gHPBo?si=al90QV63_afUyXik
❤9
Msg for SarrthiIAS 2028 Batch 6 students.
👍23❤9😁1
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍36❤6😢6🍓2
Next Mapping Mangalvaar LIVE Session Details: Date: 03/11/2026 Time: 11:00 AM onwards Video Link: https://youtube.com/live/6Y1aOgcuQLU?feature=share PPT Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mLyASkRqUwPaduEP8xHjjvPvzZdcQZ5Q/view?usp=sharing See you there!! :)
❤12🙏1
Next short mapping quiz on mountains of the world: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfEjLpOPNXM/?vrfl=ZG95Yzh6ZGlneWY1 YT: https://youtube.com/shorts/2BUMBDKzHfs?si=480q9lzOnk7YbbwF
❤18
Next Mapping Mangalvaar LIVE Session Details: Date: 29/10/2026 Time: 11:00 AM onwards Video Link: https://youtube.com/live/ZfhzImIuFO4?feature=share PPT Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1smzPTCWlWIUW2y2L9u3H12Wz3elP-Rki/view?usp=sharing See you there!! :)
❤11👍9🏆1
NCERT Class 12 Book 2 Chapter 5: https://youtu.be/XC_kBN8iiJY?si=CEF8oEAzGO6O43O6 After this, only one chapter remains! :)
❤17🔥8
Hello students. Due to my morning classes, we won't have the Mapping Mangalvaar session tomorrow. But we will have it this week itself; on Thursday. I promise that from next week onwards, we will get back on schedule! :)
❤72😭12🥰8😈7🙏5👎3👍1😢1
Next Mapping Practice Quiz! This one is on Important Lakes! ✨🏖️ YT: https://youtube.com/shorts/ft3-CVFZlpk?si=PzJdfxtwJdAX6RKX Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reel/De9HaNtvh9m/?xtok=MTltM3h1MTF1eGdkOQ==
🙏8❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @PSGeog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Today is a solar eclipse. What conclusions can you draw from it? (Multiple correct)
The shares total 176%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@PSGeog named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pallavi Saxena Geography” (@PSGeog), 15,251 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PSGeog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.