Channel
@PRO_robots
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
464subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001370582900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PRO_robots |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PRO_robots |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 464 | -1 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 465 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:02 | 461 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 462 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 461 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 457 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 456 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 455 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 455 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 9 | 39.1% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 34.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 13.0% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
EngineAI T800 demonstrates the operation of a CoolFly URBAN personal aircraft, showcasing the growing integration of humanoid robotics with advanced aerial mobility. The demonstration highlights how humanoid robots could one day perform real world tasks from the air, expanding beyond ground based operations into next-generation industrial automation.
Tencent Xiao Liu is a humanoid robot developed to support elderly care and home assistance through embodied AI. In this demonstration, the robot performs a therapeutic hand massage using its dual-arm system, showcasing precise force control, coordinated movements.
🤔1
Tau Robotics launched humanoid home cleaning in San Francisco this week: one hour, $30 flat. A human cleaner in SF averages $150–$300. Their competitor Gatsby charges $150 per robot clean. Tau just priced both out of the conversation. The catch nobody's leading with: every Tau robot is supervised live by a human operator. This isn't autonomy — it's teleoperation with better economics. A person is still doing the wor…
🔥2
Unitree just unveiled the AS2-W, a wheeled-leg hybrid version of its AS2 quadruped robot. It combines articulated legs with wheels, letting it roll fast on flat ground and switch to walking to climb rocks, slopes, and stairs. The robot can clear obstacles up to 80cm high, handle 45 degree slopes, and climb 30cm steps, guided by a Bionic Embodied Large Model paired with reinforcement learning.
Genesis AI just showcased a robot performing multiple complex tasks using the same neural network powered by highly dexterous 22-DOF Wuji Hands. ( Wuji Tech ) But here's what stands out: The AI wasn't trained by programming every movement. It learned from human demonstrations, capturing motion, force, and tactile feedback directly from real hands.
🔥2
A research team from South Korea’s KAIST and Stanford University has revealed a self-dressing robot that inflates inside the garment and wraps around the wearer’s body.
Chinese startup AheadForm has built a humanoid robot head that is nearly impossible to distinguish from a real human face. Powered by thirty precision brushless micro motors embedded beneath bionic silicone skin, the robot controls every blink, every glance, and every subtle micro expression with stunning accuracy. Cameras integrated directly into the eyes allow the robot to track faces in real time, while an onboard…
🤔1
Unmanned aerial vehicle mounting device, automatic aiming, infrared reconnaissance.
👎1🔥1
Chinese company UBTECH has launched its mass-produced UWORLD U1 ultra-bionic humanoids. Crafted at a 1:1 human scale, the male model stands 183cm tall while the female model stands 168cm.
👍1🔥1
CRW20 Combat Wolf Standing dimensions: 820 x 430 x 570 mm; weight with battery: 33 kg; effective payload: 15 kg; peak payload: 50 kg; no-load endurance/ range: 3 h / 15 km; loaded endurance/range: 2.5 h / 12 km; charging time per battery: 1.5 h IP66; operating temperature: -20°C to 55°C.
👎1🔥1
No terrain can stop the XSTO A6 Robot
🤔1
Reflex's first play date
🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PRO_robots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO ROBOTS 🤖” (@PRO_robots), 464 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PRO_robots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.