https://www.marca.com/futbol/real-madrid/opinion/2025/12/28/don-florentino-subvenciono-barca-laporta-517-millones.html Don Florentino, usted subvencionó al Barça de Laporta con 517 millones
😱2

Channel
@PMConfidencial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,892subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001003841600 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PMConfidencial |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PMConfidencial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 1,892 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 1,893 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 1,896 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 1,898 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 1,899 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 1,899 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
202 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 98 | 48.5% | |
| 👏 | 38 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 9.90% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 6.93% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 3.47% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.98% | |
| 🎅 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.495% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.marca.com/futbol/real-madrid/opinion/2025/12/28/don-florentino-subvenciono-barca-laporta-517-millones.html Don Florentino, usted subvencionó al Barça de Laporta con 517 millones
😱2
Photo, posted without a caption
💯3👏2⚡1❤1
🚨 ‼️ Falta menos de una semana ‼️ El próximo *Lunes (19 h)* tenemos la Gala de Premios 2026 de nuestro Periódico digital *Yosoynoticia.es*. Me haría ilusión que puedas venir Y NOS PODAMOS HACER UNA FOTO DE RECUERDO . Te adjunto tu invitación para ti y tu compañía. Se la puedes re envíar a quienes vengan contigo . Te adjunto INFO sobre la Gala en este link que incluye - 2 min video resumen Gala año pasado - Report…
👏2⚡1❤1
Pedro Morata @PMConfidencial-☎ pinned a photo
📸 35 años después , SM El Rey y yo nos volvimos a hacer una foto como la de 1991. 33 años después de llegar a Valencia , me gustaría hacerme y guardarme una foto de recuerdo contigo como oyente fiel de muchos años. ***El Lunes 25 de Mayo a las 19 h en el Palacio de Congresos de Valencia ***nos vemos. Si puedes vente a la Gala anual de Premios de YOSOYNOTICIA.es. Después del evento en el photocall estaré encantado de…
❤🔥5👏5👌2👍2❤1
Pedro Morata @PMConfidencial-☎ pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4👏3💯2⚡1
Channel name was changed to «Pedro Morata @PMConfidencial-☎»
Pedro Morata @PMConfidencial-☎ pinned «Como estas ? Cuanto tiempo sin saber de ti 🤦🏻♂️ !! Yo sigo por aquí pero más centrado en temas nacionales periodísticos y en otros proyectos ; uno de ellos vivir más 😃 Solo quería saludarte , pregúntarte cómo estás y decirte que nos vemos en persona el…»
Como estas ? Cuanto tiempo sin saber de ti 🤦🏻♂️ !! Yo sigo por aquí pero más centrado en temas nacionales periodísticos y en otros proyectos ; uno de ellos vivir más 😃 Solo quería saludarte , pregúntarte cómo estás y decirte que nos vemos en persona el **Lunes día 25 de Mayo a las 19 h. ** Ya te diré donde y para que . Un abrazo grande y espero que estes bien. *Pedro Morata*
❤22👏6💯5😍2⚡1👍1🤩1
Video, posted without a caption
👏10👍6❤1🎃1💯1
Pedro Morata @PMConfidencial-☎ pinned «Te deseo Salud y alegría para ti y tu familia en 2026. Pedro Morata»
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PMConfidencial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 939,449 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pedro Morata @PMConfidencial-☎” (@PMConfidencial), 1,892 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PMConfidencial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.