매일 보고는 있습니다. 유의미한 움직임이 확인되지 않아 보고만 있습니다. https://www.tradingview.com/x/EhHCh4Hx/
👍6😁2
Signed G.D

Channel
@PLUTUSbreif
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,387subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001161910619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PLUTUSbreif |
| Created | 7 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PLUTUSbreif |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 1,387 | -9 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 1,396 | -2 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 1,398 | -6 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 1,404 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 1,405 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 1,406 | +19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:02 | 1,387 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 1,388 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 1,390 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 1,393 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 1,395 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 1,399 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 1,398 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 1,402 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 1,403 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 1,403 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
98 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 58.2% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 23.5% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 16.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
매일 보고는 있습니다. 유의미한 움직임이 확인되지 않아 보고만 있습니다. https://www.tradingview.com/x/EhHCh4Hx/
👍6😁2
Signed G.D
1일봉 RSI 지표 상승 다이버전스 가능성 보입니다. 그럼에도 손절가 갭이 아직 있기 때문에 저는 공매도 홀딩 합니다. 고배율 진입하신 분들은 신중한 검토 권장 합니다. https://www.tradingview.com/x/iwzCWzIh/
❤7👍1
Signed G.D
개인 매매 공유 합니다. #BTCUSDT #바이빗 #SHORT 차트 https://www.tradingview.com/x/vrHEB6BI/ 주봉 헤드앤 숄더 패턴 가능성 근거 ENTRY 59900 전후 TARGET T1 : 48910 (+18.4%) T2 : 39110 (+34.7%) T3 : 34060 (+43.1%) T4 : 30460 (+49.2%) STOPLOSS SL1 : 70240선 돌파 성공 확인 후 (-17.3%) *손절 비율이 높습니다, 빅숏 가능성 기대 전략으로 하이 리스크 하이 리턴입니다. 저배율 소액 베팅 권장 합니다.
❤6👍1
Signed G.D
https://bybit.com/en/invite?ref=14W6o
Signed G.D
이른감이 있으나 가능성이 보이기에 공매도 진입해 보겠습니다. https://www.tradingview.com/x/jzDznUhF/
👍3
Signed G.D
하락 쐐기 패턴 진행 가능성 목표가 53470선 부근 https://www.tradingview.com/x/G44cJAZ3/
❤5
Signed G.D
공매도 물량 정리 이유 4시간봉 상승형 삼각형 패턴에 의한 단기 반등 가능성 목표가 70000선 부근 https://www.tradingview.com/x/QMpdbrjX/
❤9👍3
Signed G.D
공매도 물량 정리했습니다.
👏10
Signed G.D
심리적 지지선인 59750선 도달 후 지지 테스트 중입니다. 볼린저 밴드폭이 계속 벌어지려는 모습 중기 이평선은 하방 전환 되었으나 아직 내려오지 않은 모습으로 52530선 도달 가능성 높게 보입니다. https://www.tradingview.com/x/RDSYQwMA/
👍7
Signed G.D
https://bybit.com/en/invite?ref=14W6o
❤6
Signed G.D
개인 매매 공유 합니다. #BTCUSDT #바이빗 #SHORT https://www.tradingview.com/x/KXiQ7slG/ ENTRY 73000 전후 TARGET T1 : 67780 (+7.2%)✅ T2 : 64190 (+12.1%)✅ T3 : 59900 (+17.9%)✅ 올 타겟 달성 현 시점에서 물량 50% 털고 55480선을 T4로 설정 하겠습니다. 50000선 이탈 확인되면 추가 숏 진입 검토 하겠습니다.
❤5👍2
Signed G.D
말씀드린 63380선 에서도 지지 받지 못한 모습입니다. 26년 2월 저점인 59750선까지도 갈수 있을듯한 흐름입니다. 59750선까지 꺠지면 다음 지지선은 52530선 입니다. 볼린저 밴드 폭은 아직 다물어지려는 모습은 보이지 않고 있으며 중기 이평선은 하방 전환 이후 하방 이동하려는 모습입니다. https://www.tradingview.com/x/7neYc2TA/
❤4
Signed G.D
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PLUTUSbreif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PLUTUS_Brief” (@PLUTUSbreif), 1,387 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PLUTUSbreif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.