Channel
PL Technical Research
@PLTechnicalResearch
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,034subscribers
-122 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001700193407 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PLTechnicalResearch |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PLTechnicalResearch |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:18 | 5,034 | -13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:16 | 5,047 | -12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:25 | 5,059 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 5,064 | -15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 5,079 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:29 | 5,092 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 5,099 | -16 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 5,115 | -7 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 00:01 | 5,122 | -22 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 5,144 | -10 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 5,154 | -12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 5,166 | -20 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 5,186 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 5,196 | -23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 5,219 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 5,218 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 5,218 | +18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 5,200 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 5,195 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 5,197 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@KotakNeo · 105,312
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@IIFLCapitalA · 46,882
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@motilaloswalofficial · 198,394
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@crudeoil_mcx_commodity_cal11 · 9
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
@CommodityFocusByKotakNeo · 64,810
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@OfficialHDFCsecurities · 62,549
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
@btsreports · 21,403
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
@fivepaisaofficial · 85,930
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
@stockedgeapp · 28,246
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PL Technical Research” (@PLTechnicalResearch), 5,034 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PLTechnicalResearch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.