Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for #PLSARMY | Pulsechain News

Channel

#PLSARMY | Pulsechain News

@PLSARMYCALLS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001390163625
TypeChannel
Username@PLSARMYCALLS
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PLSARMYCALLS

Growth

424543.57 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43 subscribers22 August 2026 — 45 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–45 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 00:2445+2
14 Aug 2026, 22:5743+1
10 Aug 2026, 17:1642no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:4142first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 May 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2539.1%
👍1726.6%
1421.9%
👏46.25%
🎉11.56%
👀11.56%
💯11.56%
😴11.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2023 to 11 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2025, 15:48 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

30 May 2025, 18:07 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

14 Aug 2023, 08:05 UTC374 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

PLS will most likey range in the 4500-6000 range for a while - this is the macro accummulation level.

👍2

3 Jul 2023, 10:31 UTC243 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

SET & FORGET PLAY | 👋 [WBTC/PLS] Richard Heart has actively started to shill the Pulsechain ecosystem with several shitcoins including Pepe on Pulsechain. This is very positive for the ecosystem as Richard Heart who supposedly hates shitcoins, is starting to embrace them (since this is an accelerator to sucker in the larger crowds). However, this post is dedicated to WBTC. WBTC is a wrapped version of BTC on Pulse

🔥5🎉1

28 Jun 2023, 16:49 UTC244 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#PLSARMY! 🟣 As of shortly we will browsing newer projects on Pulsechain again! Today, an update! One of the earliest and still surviving coins on Pulsechain, $Kishka is attempting to run a community-driven VC that serves as a ‘safupad/launchpad’ for Pulsechain projects. This week will be in collaboration with Richeez NFT’s hosted by Morpheus. The VC will be hosted on twitter spaces at 19:00 CET. Tune in and find

5

15 Jun 2023, 08:30 UTC248 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

MARKETS UPDATE | 📈 We are all aware by now that legacy markets are tanking, which of course takes Pulsechain with it. In the short-term it may scare you, capitulate you, and even worse: make you lose your mind. If you are not a day trader, or not sitting in stables, there is no need for concern in the long run. Pulsechain is very likely to break new highs with relative ease in the future (as it’s a brand new L1 th

👍6

11 Jun 2023, 09:53 UTC256 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Are you still flipping shitcoins on #PULSECHAIN?

  1. Yes51%
  2. No25%
  3. Waiting for PLS to become bullish24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jun 2023, 14:48 UTC210 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

[NOT YOUR KEYS NOT YOUR COINS] | 🔑❌ This is exactly the reason why #PULSECHAIN will thrive. As Richard Heart constantly reminds us “not your keys, not your coins” events such as the SEC going after exchanges is a good reminder that your funds are at risk at any third party. There are variables that are completely out of your control, that may result in loss of funds. THIS IS WHY PULSECHAIN WILL THRIVE! Be safe frie

👏3

7 Jun 2023, 14:37 UTC165 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Something unrelated to PLS - but for those who have coins on Binance (even Binance outside of USA) we strongly suggest to move funds out ASAP just in case. The SEC news of course has an impact on the exchange but there might be more going on. BNB (the native token of Binance) is swiftly losing levels (-15% today!) and if there is a thing we have learnt from FTX (FTT), better be safe than sorry. - PLSARMY

2💯1

6 Jun 2023, 09:11 UTC143 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

While Pulsechain ecosystem is in survival mode, would you be interested in ETH plays untill times get better?

  1. Yes24%
  2. No24%
  3. Please keep it PLS only52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PLSARMYCALLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Jun 2023, 09:53 UTCAnonymous Poll83 voters

Are you still flipping shitcoins on #PULSECHAIN?

  1. Yes51%
  2. No25%
  3. Waiting for PLS to become bullish24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jun 2023, 09:11 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

While Pulsechain ecosystem is in survival mode, would you be interested in ETH plays untill times get better?

  1. Yes24%
  2. No24%
  3. Please keep it PLS only52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 May 2023, 08:22 UTCAnonymous Poll58 voters

Are you actively finding gems on Pulsechain?

  1. Yes57%
  2. No33%
  3. Focusing on a different chain10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2023 to 11 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#PLSARMY | Pulsechain News” (@PLSARMYCALLS), 45 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PLSARMYCALLS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.