Channel
@PJTZ_FK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
344subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001886815762 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PJTZ_FK |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PJTZ_FK |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 344 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 347 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 350 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 350 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 30 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2024 to 11 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
客户反馈,侧拉限位片自转轮电磁座 5679全口径 2024 新款侧拉T阀电磁座 5-6-7-9 通用座子 搭配限位片自转轮(不伤蛋尾更丝滑) 侧拉大口径上弹更省力,推针闭锁不掉落 通用欧阳线圈 动铁 阀杆 压簧 更省事 单口径座子600 💬💬💬💬普京图纸频道💬💬💬💬 🔠蛋型母鸡 🔠电磁阀套件 🔠板球兔套等 🔠镜桥图纸 🔠消音图纸 🔠蛋轮定制 🔠针阀z接恒压头堵头气室 🔠反馈频道 🚀普京聊天群 💬图纸定制咨询
❤1
机械中拉平衡阀惯性击锤 玩家小车队反馈,一周完工测试 同款图纸点击 口径6,即将完工测试 💬💬💬💬普京图纸频道💬💬💬💬 🔠蛋型母鸡 🔠电磁阀套件 🔠板球兔套等 🔠镜桥图纸 🔠消音图纸 🔠蛋轮定制 🔠针阀z接恒压头堵头气室 🔠反馈频道 🚀普京聊天群 💬图纸定制咨询
客户反馈,机械中拉平衡阀惯性击锤 同款图纸点击 口径6,即将完工测试 💬💬💬💬普京图纸频道💬💬💬💬 🔠蛋型母鸡 🔠电磁阀套件 🔠板球兔套等 🔠镜桥图纸 🔠消音图纸 🔠蛋轮定制 🔠针阀z接恒压头堵头气室 🔠反馈频道 🚀普京聊天群 💬图纸定制咨询
👍1
中拉大轮平衡阀拉阀电磁套件 搭载全新结构平衡阀 测试20压完美开阀 使用390UF小电容,电压230V 后期氧化完工再发视频 小电容也可以开高压 大蛋轮设计 后期将同步推出全口径细节 同款图纸点击 💬💬💬💬普京图纸频道💬💬💬💬 🔠蛋型母鸡 🔠电磁阀套件 🔠板球兔套等 🔠镜桥图纸 🔠消音图纸 🔠蛋轮定制 🔠针阀z接恒压头堵头气室 🔠反馈频道 🚀普京聊天群 💬图纸定制咨询
中拉大轮平衡阀拉阀电磁套件 未氧化未打样一次测试OK 搭载全新结构平衡阀 测试20压完美开阀 使用390UF小电容,电压230V 后期氧化完工再发视频 小电容也可以开高压 大蛋轮设计 同款图纸点击 💬💬💬💬普京图纸频道💬💬💬💬 🔠蛋型母鸡 🔠电磁阀套件 🔠板球兔套等 🔠镜桥图纸 🔠消音图纸 🔠蛋轮定制 🔠针阀z接恒压头堵头气室 🔠反馈频道 🚀普京聊天群 💬图纸定制咨询
❤1👍1😁1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @PJTZ_FK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 83,539 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PJTZ_FK named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“普京-玩家DIY反馈频道” (@PJTZ_FK), 344 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PJTZ_FK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.