Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PI中文社区

Channel

PI中文社区

@PI_BSC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003120445963
TypeChannel
Username@PI_BSC
Created27 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/PI_BSC

Growth

17 August 2026 — 1 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:321no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:491first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 27 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
4
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

793 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉17722.3%
🔥16821.2%
👍15920.1%
14918.8%
😁14017.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 793reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2025 to 27 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2025, 12:38 UTC349 views111 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

流通市值突破一亿🔥🔥🔥 大家冲起来🚀🚀🚀

🎉3222😁22🔥18👍17

27 Sept 2025, 12:17 UTC289 views116 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

9.27日 20.00 上线欧易钱包热门 🚀🚀🚀 📈Ca:0xf1f1313ca243cdbf38c702b5e7d0679eec6d48db

👍32🎉26😁21🔥2017

27 Sept 2025, 09:37 UTC308 views114 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

AVE 🔥热搜持续霸榜十天 🔥 📈Ca:0xf1f1313ca243cdbf38c702b5e7d0679eec6d48db

👍2524🔥24😁21🎉20

27 Sept 2025, 08:47 UTC272 views117 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Dextools 已更新✅

🎉29🔥2622😁21👍19

27 Sept 2025, 08:41 UTC248 views115 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Dexscreener 已更新✅

🔥30🎉2322😁22👍18

27 Sept 2025, 07:55 UTC222 views78 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

https://www.pinksale.finance/pinklock/bsc/record/1357572 池子已锁🔒

🎉2120👍13🔥13😁11

27 Sept 2025, 07:54 UTC210 views70 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x29cd6c7184a632408f8d121341ad5c0c7039f14aa6a76a8226dfd2981ecb6607 管理员权限已放弃✅

🔥17🎉1614👍12😁11

27 Sept 2025, 07:51 UTC195 views72 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Pi Network 是一个由数千万用户组成的社区,他们通过挖掘 Pi 加密货币来使用和构建 Web3 应用生态系统。这个区块链网络依靠其先驱者社区,并通过创新的移动挖掘机制奖励他们 推特:https://x.com/picoreteam 官网:https://minepi.com/ 电报:https://t.me/PI_BNB_USD 交易:https://pancakeswap.finance/swap?utm_source=tokenpocket&outputCurrency=0xF1F1313Ca243cdBF38c702b5E7D0679eEC6d48DB DEX:https://www.dextools.io/app/cn/bnb/pair-explorer/0x384d4e44170925c9e259a32146deb412bcf0a705?t=1758948191046

👍23🔥20😁11🎉108

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @PI_BSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 825,043 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PI中文社区” (@PI_BSC), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PI_BSC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.