Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PIB Fact Check

Channel

PIB Fact Check

@PIB_FactCheck

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,041subscribers

-188 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559076845
TypeChannel
Username@PIB_FactCheck
DescriptionCountering misinformation on Govt. policies/schemes. Suspect a Govt. related news to be fake? Send it to us at +918799711259/[email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/PIB_FactCheck

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,04118,23418,137.56 August 2026 — 18,229 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,229 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,225 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,224 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,229 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,228 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,234 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,232 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,229 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,214 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,202 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,193 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,198 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,195 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,191 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,189 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,190 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,188 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,183 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,180 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,171 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,165 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,166 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,173 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,178 subscribers6 September 2026 — 18,163 subscribers10 September 2026 — 18,152 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,140 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,142 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,140 subscribers18 September 2026 — 18,147 subscribers29 September 2026 — 18,160 subscribers5 October 2026 — 18,172 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,164 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,152 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,136 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,134 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,138 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,132 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,129 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,116 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,110 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,105 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,103 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,097 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,101 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,099 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,103 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,094 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,099 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,088 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,089 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,085 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,081 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,075 subscribers6 November 2026 — 18,067 subscribers6 November 2026 — 18,065 subscribers7 November 2026 — 18,052 subscribers9 November 2026 — 18,043 subscribers10 November 2026 — 18,041 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 96 days, net -188. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,012–18,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 23:0018,041-2
9 Nov 2026, 10:5918,043-9
7 Nov 2026, 23:5618,052-13
6 Nov 2026, 23:4018,065-2
6 Nov 2026, 03:0618,067-8
5 Nov 2026, 02:2818,075-6
4 Nov 2026, 03:0718,081-4
3 Nov 2026, 02:5618,085-4
2 Nov 2026, 05:3718,089+1
1 Nov 2026, 03:0418,088-11
31 Oct 2026, 04:0818,099+5
30 Oct 2026, 07:2818,094-9
29 Oct 2026, 04:1018,103+4
28 Oct 2026, 01:1818,099-2
27 Oct 2026, 02:1118,101+4
25 Oct 2026, 23:0518,097-6
24 Oct 2026, 23:0018,103-2
24 Oct 2026, 00:3818,105-5
22 Oct 2026, 23:3018,110-6
21 Oct 2026, 22:4918,116first reading

Engagement

103 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 18,041 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,960
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 103 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held103 (29 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total39,240
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 04:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,460
Videos
≈491
Links
≈1,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21m 34s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC730 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Let Truth Shine, Not Fake News ❌ Don't let fake news overshadow the truth. ✅ Pause. Verify. Then Click. Stay informed. Stay alert. Stop misinformation. #PIBFactCheck

8 Nov 2026, 05:10 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🪔 Festive offers may look tempting, but beware of the hidden sparks of cyber fraud! ⚠️ Scammers often use fake discounts, festive deals and phishing links to steal your personal and financial information. ✅ Always verify the authenticity of a website or offer before clicking on links or making payments. 🔐 This #Diwali, let your celebrations sparkle, not your personal data fall into the wrong hands. Think before y…

7 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

This Diwali, let’s illuminate our digital spaces with facts and verified information. Don't let fake news dim the light of truth. Verify before you share. Choose facts over rumours. Celebrate responsibly. Spread awareness, not misinformation. #PIBFactCheck #CyberSafeDiwali

6 Nov 2026, 05:21 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🪔 इस दिवाली, खुशियां बांटें… OTP नहीं! Fake offers and suspicious links can cost you more than you expect. Pause. Verify. Then Click. #PIBFactCheck

5 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🪔 Be Scam-Safe This Diwali! Keep your wallet closed for too-good-to-be-true cashback offers and fake payment link traps! This Diwali, spread light, share smiles and keep your money safe. Pause. Rethink. Verify before you hit SEND! Celebrate wisely. Stay scam-safe. ✨ #PIBFactCheck #CyberSafeDiwali

2 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Beware of False Claims! A message being circulated on WhatsApp claims that the RBI has announced that new ₹10, ₹20 and ₹50 denomination banknotes may not be available in sufficient quantities ahead of Diwali. #PIBFactCheck : ❌ The claim is FAKE. ✅ The RBI has made NO such announcement regarding the availability of small denomination banknotes. ℹ️ Verify information through official sources and do not share unv…

2 Nov 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

DISINFORMATION ALERT 🚨 A video shared by X handle ‘Anushitiwari22’ is circulating on social media with the claim people have been injured and killed in Delhi Police firing. #PIBFactCheck ❌ The claim is FALSE and misleading. ✅ The video is being shared with the intention to mislead and spread disinformation. The video is related to a protest by garment workers in Bangladesh and has no connection to any incident…

31 Oct 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

A social media post has misrepresented Union Minister Piyush Goyal, claiming that he said, 'I am backed by a powerful country’s Deputy PM because his daughter wants to work in Bollywood' #PIBFactCheck: ❌ This claim is Misleading. 🔸 The Union Minister Piyush Goyal did not make any such statement. ✅ The Union Minister said that ''I have a deputy prime minister of one of the most powerful countries of the world who …

31 Oct 2026, 02:29 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

DEEPFAKE VIDEO ALERT! A digitally manipulated video circulating on social media falsely attributes remarks to Defence Minister Rajnath Singh concerning the India–China border situation and Indian Army personnel. #PIBFactCheck The video has been manipulated using Artificial Intelligence (AI). The Defence Minister has made no such remarks. The fabricated video misrepresents his statements on a sensitive national …

29 Oct 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

FAKE NEWS ALERT A video is circulating on social media with the false claim that it is related to an incident involving Indian nationals and the Chinese Army. #PIBFactCheck The claim is misleading and fake. The video is unrelated to the claim and is being shared with the intent to spread disinformation. Citizens are advised not to share or forward unverified content and to verify information through official …

27 Oct 2026, 06:21 UTC≈2,430 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

🚨 FAKE ₹1,000 NOTE ALERT! Several social media posts claim that a new ₹1,000 note has been issued. #PIBFactCheck ❌ This claim is fake. ✅ The RBI has made no announcement regarding the issuance of a new ₹1,000 note. 🔸 Verify information through official sources and do not share unverified claims. 💡 Come across suspicious content related to the Central Government? Report it to @PIBFactCheck. 📲 +91 8799711259 📩 f…

Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @PIB_FactCheck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@PIB_FactCheck edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CyberDost
@cyberdosti4c · 21,690
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 23 September 2026
Sarkari Job News
@sarkarijobnews · 38,820
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
Delhi Police
@DelhiPoliceOfficial · 25,896
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 12 September 2026
MyGov Newsdesk
@MyGovCoronaNewsdesk · 366,129
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Marugujarat.in Official ©
@marugujarat_in · 99,636
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PIB Fact Check” (@PIB_FactCheck), 18,041 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PIB_FactCheck.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.