Channel
@PERISTLIWA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001202762968 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PERISTLIWA |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PERISTLIWA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 4 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 4 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2022 to 17 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
testimoni 👇 -> Salin aja kalau males ketik sendiri 1000/10! Gak ada lawan sih kecepatannya, literally super sat-set banget. Baru transfer, eh langsung dikerjain — gak pake drama, gak pake tunggu-tunggu! Worth it parah, hasilnya juga rapi dan sesuai ekspektasi banget. Aku tuh tipe yang detail, tapi ini bener-bener bikin puas. Trusted beneran, asli next pasti repeat order lagi. Beli tanpa ragu deh, apalagi dikasih bo…
Signed Anita, busy
Close, don't send form. @.PERISTLIWAbot
Signed Z
𝙅𝙖𝙨𝙖 𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙨 by username or number apps Telegram, Instagram, Whatsapp, Tiktok (aplikasi lain price tanya rc admin yang on) 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙚: 3kc - 5kc / pesan & foto/video 2k - 4k / pesan & foto/video 𝙐𝙥 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙧𝙙 & 𝙑𝙤𝙩𝙚 & 𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 apps telegram 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙚: max 15 300c / account 30p / account 𝙐𝙥 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙚 apps telegram (acc sendiri) 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙚: max 10s 350c / account 35p / account 𝙐𝙥 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙚 apps telegram regular 𝙋𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙚: max 50s 450c / ac…
👍1
Signed ilo
.
Signed ilo
📝 Rate n Kritsar @truund miaaa: 10/10 , talent nya sweet and carjng bgtt ❤️❤️ kadang slr tp worth it sihh , 😍😍 salwa: 100/10, worth it menurutku karna talentnya care, perhatian, sweet, seru & no kritsar sih dari aku 🫶🏼 017 . Sacherla Laveilleze: 9,7/10 talent nys seru pake banget, walaupun kadang" slr, but it's okay 👍🤍 gress alther act: 8/10 perhatian bgt talentnya, tapi kurang fastrespon menurutku tapi overall b…
Signed Anita
Format [@PERISTLIWA] Username: Item yang di beli: Jumlah: Total: Inrush? [50p/500c per 10 item]: yes/no Payment: Send to: @PERISTLIWA_bot Contoh pengisian format Format [@PERISTLIWA] Username: @zicta Item yang di beli: upfoll acc sendiri Jumlah: 10 Total: 4kc Inrush? [50p/500c per 10 item]: yes, 10 item Payment: Btc
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝐀𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐒 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 @ONLYU_FOEVER - 5245246870 @DTMILO - 6097169682 @ZICTA - 2106368421 TIDAK ADA PENAMBAHAN KATA / PEGANTIAN HURUF SELAIN ITU 𝗣𝗔𝗟𝗦𝗨. old proof @nokosellmillstore FORMAT: [https://t.me/PERISTLIWA/24] ❗️𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆❗️Tolong jangan hit and run (hnr) saat di minta rate https://t.me/PERISTLIWA/33, saya percepat pesanan kamu untuk meminta rate itu, jadi tolong timbal balik.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Testimoni 👇👇
📝 Rate n kritsar @peristliwa ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ: 10/10 aman dan trusted thank's you ㅤㅤDawLita, pending.: 💯 amanah Ðrvgxn: 100 % fast keren azriel: ♾️/10 sat set, kece, mantap dah👍🏼 Rest pagi siang sore aja: 1000000000/10 , pengerjaan nya cepet , fsr , ramah pula Pokoknya mantep deh 😍🫶 Emilly Marienetta: 10000000/10 alias out of ten, karenaaa pengerjaannya cepet banget dan pelayanannya bagus sekaliii, Makasih yaaa ❀…
💯2❤1👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PERISTLIWA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 719,236 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“proof, read pin.” (@PERISTLIWA), 4 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PERISTLIWA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.