Last real champion!❤️💎 •➵| @ProBadWrestling ࿐
❤11
Signed PBW_SUPPORT

Channel
@PBW_ARCHIVES
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,156subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001551868363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PBW_ARCHIVES |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PBW_ARCHIVES |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 1,156 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 1,163 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 1,165 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 1,170 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 1,174 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 1,175 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 1,175 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 1,176 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 35 | 43.2% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 29.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 12.3% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 11.1% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2025 to 30 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Last real champion!❤️💎 •➵| @ProBadWrestling ࿐
❤11
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
اونلی فنز بانو لیسی ایوانز🔥🔞 📥 دریافت ♨️ #Lacey_Evans ⚜ #Ashkan 🆔 @PBW_DIVA
🔥3
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
فایلجداگانه های راو ۲۶ می ۲۰۲۵! نیودی vs وار ریدرز vs کرید (دانلود) لیو مورگان vs کایری سین (دانلود) پنتا vs دراگون لی vs چد گیبل (دانلود) فین بلر vs ست رالینز vs سمی زین (دانلود) •➵| @ProBadWrestling ࿐
💔2❤1
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
جداگانه های ستردی نایت مین اونت! جان سینا vs ارتروث (دانلود) جی اوسو vsلوگان پاول (دانلود) پانک و سمی vs ست و بریکر(دانلود) درو مکینتایرvs دیمین پریست (دانلود) •➵| @ProBadWrestling ࿐
❤1
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
جداگانه های اسمکداون ۲۳ می ۲۰۲۵! زلینا وگا vs شارلوت vs جولیا ناکامورا vs ال ای نایت vs الیستر بلک استریت پرافیتس vs فرکسیوم جیمی و ری فینیکس vs فاتو و جی سی متئو •➵| @ProBadWrestling ࿐
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
جداگانه راو ۱۹ می ۲۰۲۵! • پنتا و ایجی استایلز در vs فین بالور و جیدی مکدونا [دانلود مسابقه] • مسابقه مقدماتی مانی این د بنک زنان: بکی لینچ vs ناتالیا vs روکسانا پرز [دانلود مسابقه] • دومین مسابقه مقدماتی مانی این د بنک زنان: ریا ریپلی vs زویی استارک vs کایری سین [دانلود مسابقه] • جی اوسو vs براون بریکر [دانلود مسابقه] • پروموی لوگان پاول + اتفاقات مهم اطرافش [دانلود بخش کامل] •➵| @ProBadWrestling ࿐
👍2
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
جان سینا و میستریوز vs رومن، جی و جیمی! شو اسمکداون ۱۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۲۱ کیفیت: 1080 کیفیت: 720 کیفیت: 480 #Y @PBW_ARCHIVES
👍2😁1
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
بهترین ورود های تاریخ رسلمنیا! کیفیت: ۱۰۸۰ کیفیت: ۷۲۰ کیفیت: ۴۸۰ 👨💻 #Y 🆔 @PBW_ARCHIVES
👍3
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
جداگانه اسمکداون ۱۶ می ۲۰۲۵! الکسا بلیس vs میچین vs چلسی گرین جهت دریافت کلیک کنید! ال ای نایت vs جی سی متئو جهت دریافت کلیک کنید! تیفانی vs نایا جکس برای دریافت کلیک کنید! ری فینیکس vs جیمی اوسو vs سولوسیکوا جهت دریافت کلیک کنید! فرکسیوم vs دی آی وای جهت دریافت کلیک کنید! الیستر بلک vs کارملو جهت دریافت کلیک کنید! @PBW_ARCHIVES
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
اندرتیکر vs تریپل اچ سوپرشوداون ۲۰۱۸ کیفیت: 1080p کیفیت: 720p کیفیت: 480p #Y @PBW_ARCHIVES
🔥7👍1
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
تمامی تقابل های ارتروث و جان سینا! کیفیت: 1080p کیفیت: 720p کیفیت: 480p #Y @PBW_ARCHIVES
😁8
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
🤼♀ لدر مچ مردان 🏟 رویداد :مانی این د بنک ۲۰۲۴ 1080p :کیفیت📌 720p :کیفیت📌 480p :کیفیت📌 💎 #Full_Match 👨💻 #Y 🆔 @PBW_ARCHIVES
Signed PBW_SUPPORT
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PBW_ARCHIVES. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آرشیو مسابقات |📺| PRO BAD WRESTLING” (@PBW_ARCHIVES), 1,156 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PBW_ARCHIVES.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.