Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @College808. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,526–1,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 09:14
1,526
-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:51
1,528
+2
6 Aug 2026, 07:35
1,526
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:21
1,526
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.72%
avg views ÷ 1,526 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held
20 (2 June 2026 – 24 July 2026)
Views total
532
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
*کافیست خودتان را درون موقعیت تصور کنید...
*
تصور کنید با انسانی دیگر در موقعیتی دشوار برای عبور از صخره ای خطرناک همسفر هستید که هر آن امکان سقوط در آن برای هر دو شما است به علاوه هر حرکتی از سوی شما میتواند شانس بقا یا سقوط طرف مقابلتان را افزایش دهد. در این حالت اگر نفر مقابلتان دستش را برای کمک به سمت شما دراز کرد چه میکنید؟
آیا پیش خودتان نمیگویید این همانی بود که تا دیروز تا حرفی میزدم بر رویم اسلحه می کشید و ب…
سال ها پیش بعد آشنایی با مرحوم مهندس معین فر از طریق ایشان با انجمنی از مهندسان ساختمان(اسم نمی آورم) آشنا شدم که ظاهرا بعد تاسیس توسط ایشان(در قبل از انقلاب) خود ایشان در آن فعالیتی نداشتند و سال ها بود که اسم ثبت شده این انجمن خاک خورده بود و تنها توسط تعدادی از پروفسورهای عزیز به محفلی خانوادگی برای دورهمی های آخر هفته اشان تبدیل شده بود.
خلاصه بعد چند فعالیت همایش و دوره و این ها که برای این انجمن با اطلاع رسانی …
بحران سوئز--تنگه هرمز
از تجربه تاریخی علیه سکوت امروز چپ مقاومتی
بحران امروز از جهاتی دقیقا مشابه الگوی قبلی تاریخی خود در بحران سوئز در سال 1956 میباشد
بحرانی که بر سر تصاحب مالکیت و بستن تنگه (کانال سوئز) رخ داد.
منتها میدانیم که کانال سوئز با تنگه هرمز تفاوت ها دارد.
اما آنچه اهمیت دارد امروز به آن دقت کنیم مواضع روشنکفران در آن زمان نسبت به این بحران و انقلابی که در پی آن با دخالت شوروی برای سرکوب آن در مجارست…
خاک این سرزمین بدجور جون میده برای عزلت نشینی!
در روزهایی به سر میبریم که میبایست از درون تاریخ کشور خودمان به زور به دنبال معدود الگوهای مرتبط با این روزها بگردیم تا بلکه راه چاره ای برای خروج از بن بست سیاسی الان کشورمان پیدا کنیم
اتفاقا بین محمد سامتینگ های تاریخ خودمان یکیشون ولی یکی بود که اومد یک کارهایی هم بکند که عزلت نشین اش کردند.
امروز که یک عده افراطی جنگ طلب در سیاست کشور به نوکر حرف گوش کن پوتین در ا…
مقدار طلبی قدری بیشتر از یک تخم مرغ آب پز
-بعد از وصل شدن اینترنت، به شرکت پذیرنده دامین سایت ایمیلی فرستادم و با شکایت از این وضع موجود که هر استارتاپی را از ماندن و کارآفرینی کردن در این مملکت به غلط کردن انداخته است از آنها درخواست خسارت کردم منتها طبق انتظارم هریک مدعی شدند که تقصیری نداشتند و از سوی بالا دستی به آنها فشار آورده شده بود تا اینترنت را به روی ملت قطع کنند و سرورهای خارجی را اینطور از دسترس خارج کن…
صرفا برای تامین هزینه تمدید سرور سایت و تنها به مدت 24 ساعت
امکان خرید دانلودی برای برخی از محصولات آموزشی 808 فراهم شده است.
در ادامه متن این پست:
https://t.me/Civil808_Admin/78
در مدت کوتاه تعیین شده بعد از انتخاب جهت واریز میتوانید به آیدی پشتیبانی پیام دهید تا خدمتتان شماره کارت بفرستم و بعد لینک دانلود را خدمتتان ارسال کنم.
چند نکته مهم:
-ممکن است قبلا به طرق دیگه مثلا توسط دلاورمردانی در عرضه فضای مجازی لینک…
اسم هانری لوفور را شنیده اید؟
کتاب فضا-تفاوت-زندگی روزمره یا کتاب حق به شهر را چطور؟
موضوعات فضا-زمان و فضاهای شهری که تخصص مهندسان عمران-معماری و شهرسازی را دربر میگیرد از جمله دغدغه هانری لوفور بود.
امروز با صاحبخانه بر سر تمدید اجاره خانه ام قرار داشتم. آدم بدی نیست. بازنشسته ایست که کل دارایی اش همین یک واحد است.
پیراهن مشکی به تن کرده بود که برود تشییع جنازه آقایش.
به من گفت تو کی میروی؟
گفتم حاج آقا امثال م…
پاسخ به برخی از سوالات این روزهای شما از 808:
همانطور که اطلاع دارید کلیه فعالیت های تجاری وبسایت 808 از 9 اسفند تا امروز متوقف شده است(البته در دی 1404 هم 21 روز متوقف شده بود) در این مدت امکان خرید هیچ نوع فایلی از روی وبسایت 808 فراهم نبوده است.
چرا؟
از پول بدم می آید یا اینکه قهر کرده ام یا چی؟
دوره قهر کردن هم گذشته است. امثال من همینکه این سال ها در عمل خودشان را آلوده این کثافت همرنگی با جمهوری اسلامی نکرده …
دوستان بخش وبلاگ سایت انگلیسی زبان 808 به نشانی
www.ED808.com
راه افتاد که میتوانید دنبال بفرمایید.
About ED808
ED is short of edification:
Like the film “Twelve Angry Men” , being number eight was always my dream. 808 in my view could be a sign of freedom in creativity and open space for following limitless dreams. When I started my first website Saze808.com from 2007 I was very thrilled about liberal freedom on t…
بلبل و گل رز سرخ: (یادداشت موقت به مناسبت عاشورا تاسوعای امسال)
داستان Nightingales and the rose را لابد به خاطر دارید.
اصل آن از اشعار حافظ است اما اسکار وایلد در داستان کوتاهی در سال 1888 به زیبایی آنرا بازسرایی میکند.
خلاصه اش این است:
پسرکی کارگر عاشق دختری می شود و در رقابت با پسر ثروتمند دیگر، برای دلربایی از دختر به دنبال چیدن گل رز سرخی می رود. در این راه بلبل به او کمک میکند اما به دلیل خارهای به جا مانده …
توافقی که در آن همزمان همه طرف های درگیر باختند!
*
در پست قبلی ام اشاره کردم که هر توافقی که منجر به پایان هر نوع جنگی باشد خوب است. حتی اگر مفاد تفاهم نامه در بلند مدت به قیمت هزینه مستاجران کارگر آن سرزمین تمام شود. در جنگی که دو طرف شر هستند و هیچ خیری بینشان نیست اولین کار این است که خود این جنگ سریعتر تمام شود.
اما در ارتباط با خود توافق اول از همه بایست مرور کرد که در چه شرایطی ایجاد شده است:
از این طرف مسئولی…
نمایشنامه «آدرس خانه دوست»
سال ها پیش وقتی داشتم کار مصاحبه های رادیو 808 را پیش میبردم یکبار بهم پیشنهاد ساخت مستندی عجیب شد. فردی انبوه ساز پیشنهاد داده بود که از او به عنوان مدل یک فرد موفق، مستند مصاحبه ای در قالب مصاحبه های با افراد موفق صنعت ساختمان در رادیو 808 آن هم با همان شرطی که خودش تعیین میکند ضبط کنم و ایشان هم در مقابل با پاداشی قابل توجه جبران کند!
برایم موضوع قدری مشکوک بود که در این اوضاع که همه تل…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PBD808. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,116,061 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال طراحی عملکردی و بهسازی لرزهای” (@PBD808), 1,526 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PBD808.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
