Channel
@PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE
On this record: Previous handles Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
6,211subscribers
-39 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002019546160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE |
@PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today β only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 6,211 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 6,216 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 6,224 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 6,228 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 6,252 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 6,250 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 6,250 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (6 August 2026 β 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 416 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
βͺοΈ1300+ UC AVLIABLE β‘ CHECK ALL SCREENSHOT FOR MORE DETAILS / UNDER AGE β¨LOGIN - TW SINGLE π΅PRICE :- 4999 FIXED ππ @MR_PARVEZ_OWNER β ππ’ππ‘ @PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE β
Signed γ π£ππ₯π©ππ γ[ π’πͺπ‘ππ₯ β’Μ² Μ²Β²Μ²β΄Μ²
π ββ π¦π’ππ ββ INR_8,999 π ββ π£π’π¦π§ππ ππππ’π¨π‘π§ π¦π’ππ π’π¨π§ β€οΈ πππ£π£π¬ ππ¨π¦π§π’π ππ₯ β€οΈ π π‘ππͺ ππ¨π¦π§π’π ππ₯ π β ππ’ππ‘ ππ’π₯ π§π₯π¨π¦π§ππ πππππ¦ β --------------------------------------------------------- ππ’ππ‘ @PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE β ππ¨π¬ ππ§ @MR_PARVEZ_OWNER β β π§π₯π¨π¦π§ππ π―π―π―π―π―π―π―π― π§πππ‘ππ¦ π π¬ ππ₯πππ‘π, πππͺππ¬π¦ π¦πππ ππ‘π π¦πππ¨π₯ππ πππππ¦ β β β β β ......
Signed γ π£ππ₯π©ππ γ[ π’πͺπ‘ππ₯ β’Μ² Μ²Β²Μ²β΄Μ²
β‘ CHECK ALL SCREENSHOT FOR MORE DETAILS π’LOGIN - TWITTER SINGLE π΅PRICE :- 5K FIXED ππ @MR_PARVEZ_OWNER β ππ’ππ‘ @PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE β
Signed γ π£ππ₯π©ππ γ[ π’πͺπ‘ππ₯ β’Μ² Μ²Β²Μ²β΄Μ²
69 HIGH LVL ID 54 MYTHIC 19 GUL LAP ULTIMATE BACKPACK AVA DYNAMO SET AVAILABLE UC 360 AVAILABLE RP MAX CURRENT TEAR ACE 5 βοΈ NARUTO SET AVAILABLE OP CAR SCREEN AVAILABLE MYTHIC BACKPACK OP INVENTORY πLOGIN - TWITTER SINGLE π°PRICE - 1199 INR ONLY/- ππ @MR_PARVEZ_OWNER β ππ’ππ‘ @PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE β
Signed γ π£ππ₯π©ππ γ[ π’πͺπ‘ππ₯ β’Μ² Μ²Β²Μ²β΄Μ²
#NEXT_POSTING π β’ 83 ACC LVL HIGH β’ 68.5 COLLECTION LVL β’ 152 OP MYTHICS β’ 4 X-SUIT LVL 4,2,1,1 β’ ROARING LVL 6 β’ AK*M LVL 4 β’ AM*R LVL 4 β’ M*G3 LVL 4 REST LABS CHECK IN SS β’ 400+ UC AFTER RP MAX β’ 3.5 BIG MATERIAL β’ 2 MYTHIC VOICE β’ UAZ LVL 3 REST CHECK ALL SS βοΈ LOGIN - TWITTER SINGLE RXTE - 8999 INR ONLY πΈ ππ @MR_PARVEZ_OWNER β ππ’ππ‘ @PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE β
Signed γ π£ππ₯π©ππ γ[ π’πͺπ‘ππ₯ β’Μ² Μ²Β²Μ²β΄Μ²
β‘ CHECK ALL SCREENSHOT FOR MORE DETAILS π’LOGIN - TWITTER SINGLE π΅PRICE :- 4500 FIXED ππ @MR_PARVEZ_OWNER β ππ’ππ‘ @PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE β
Signed γ π£ππ₯π©ππ γ[ π’πͺπ‘ππ₯ β’Μ² Μ²Β²Μ²β΄Μ²
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππππ πΌπΎπΎππππ πππππ β’ΜΆβ (@PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE), 6,211 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PARVEZ_TRUSTED_STORE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.