Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PAGUYFESS.

Channel

PAGUYFESS.

@PAGUYFESS

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

33,485subscribers

+873 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768206036
TypeChannel
Username@PAGUYFESS
DescriptionLet the melodies drift beneath the striking blue sky, where summer breezes carry stories from one soul to another. ☻☀️ On Duty: @ Complaints: @KrisarPF_Bot. Twibbon: @PFTwibbonBot. Official Bot: @.PaguyFess_Bot.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PAGUYFESS

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

32,61233,48533,048.56 August 2026 — 32,612 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,612 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,613 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,652 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,671 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,673 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,682 subscribers15 August 2026 — 32,678 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,704 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,733 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,747 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,738 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,769 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,782 subscribers23 August 2026 — 32,808 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,845 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,912 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,922 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,971 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,977 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,991 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,028 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,049 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,031 subscribers3 September 2026 — 33,061 subscribers5 September 2026 — 33,090 subscribers8 September 2026 — 33,190 subscribers11 September 2026 — 33,251 subscribers13 September 2026 — 33,276 subscribers14 September 2026 — 33,375 subscribers16 September 2026 — 33,395 subscribers19 September 2026 — 33,405 subscribers26 September 2026 — 33,485 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +873. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,481–33,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 05:0033,485+80
19 Sept 2026, 08:3633,405+10
16 Sept 2026, 20:0133,395+20
14 Sept 2026, 20:0133,375+99
13 Sept 2026, 04:0133,276+25
11 Sept 2026, 06:5833,251+61
8 Sept 2026, 11:3933,190+100
5 Sept 2026, 05:2033,090+29
3 Sept 2026, 11:4233,061+30
2 Sept 2026, 04:0733,031-18
1 Sept 2026, 04:2633,049+21
31 Aug 2026, 01:2833,028+37
30 Aug 2026, 00:1232,991+14
28 Aug 2026, 21:4432,977+6
27 Aug 2026, 21:5432,971+49
26 Aug 2026, 21:4732,922+10
25 Aug 2026, 20:0532,912+67
24 Aug 2026, 19:3232,845+37
23 Aug 2026, 02:5832,808+26
21 Aug 2026, 13:1732,782first reading

Engagement

919 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.844%
avg views ÷ 33,485 subscribers
Avg views / post
283
412 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
412
of 919 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 72 of 412 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held919 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total116,493
Reactions total256
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,920
Videos
≈761
Links
≈8,810

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 12s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

705 reactions across 166 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤39155.5%
🔥679.50%
🏆659.22%
❤‍🔥628.79%
⚡365.11%
💋243.40%
💯202.84%
🍓192.70%
🆒91.28%
🕊60.851%
🦄60.851%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 193 of the 919 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 919 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 919 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PAGUYFESS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 919 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 11:48 UTC219 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

ㅤㅤ The last menfess has been delivered, and the queue is finally empty. That means it’s time for Indigo to say goodbye for today’s shift! Thank you for allowing me to be a small part of your day today. Whether you sent a menfess, leave a trace, or simply stopped by, your presence is always appreciated. It has been a pleasure spending this shift with you, Pepssie! If you need to submit a report or if your account has …

❤3

27 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTC259 viewsread 27 September 2026

hi we looking for peeps who using hearts2hearts, tws, cortis and tuide! ♥️

27 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC295 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤ ㅤSprig grows red, faded in sweet autumn. ㅤAll you've had was roots and a small ㅤhope for it not to be forgotten. Are you ㅤletting the season shifted in blurs? ㅤㅤ❀ To SEVENTEEN's Dreamers: ㅤㅤYOON JEONGHAN x JOSHUA HONG. ㅤㅤ───────────────────────── ㅤㅤ

27 Sept 2026, 11:27 UTC335 viewsread 27 September 2026

CALLING ALL RIIZE ANTON PORTRAYERS TO JOIN AND BUILD OUR DORM WITH SFS SYSTEM! We have decided what kind of concept we're willing to use, just some more preparation. Hop in if you have the willingness, we're waiting for you.

27 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC349 viewsread 27 September 2026

CALLING OUT FOR ALL GEN 4&5 MUSES, LET'S JOIN WITH US, yang suka yapping, talktive yang ga stuck HI doang! If you think you’d fit in, klik this link for join!

27 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC401 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Our upcoming circle is currently seeking Park Seah & Martin Edwards. Prospective members are expected to maintain good communication, engage in group discussions, remain committed to their muse, and contribute meaningfully as we build the circle together. The circle will also operate under an sfs system.

❤3

27 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC415 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤGREDSSÉ GATE STANDS OPEN ㅤ Through the shrouded mist and crooked woods, a forsaken gate has finally creaked ajar. Beyond its ancient threshold lies a realm steeped in silence—where wandering souls traverse without destination, forgotten whispers linger within the gloom, and something primordial watches from beyond the veil. Tonight, the gates of Gredsse are unsealed. Step forth. Forsake the mortal path. Cross…

❤2

27 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC403 viewsread 27 September 2026

calling out NEWJEANS & TREASURE RP-ers 💬 (non-twins, wo sfs system)

27 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC416 viewsread 27 September 2026

Freedom joins us, exciting adventures accompanied by laughter together. Our fair, just hand exist ready in the direction of support your freedom. CALLING ALL TWS–RPERS to join us.

Showing the 12 most recent of 919 posts we hold for @PAGUYFESS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTCFinal Results82 voters

What session should we open this afternoon?

  1. Menfess Sessions.51%
  2. Campfire Sessions.57%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 919 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

THE BOYNEXTDOOR: #ASpoonfulOfSungho
@RHYTHMOFBND · 294
3 posts
THREADS BASE ©
@ThreadsBase · 313
2 posts
CLO’VER Project.
@CLO_VERPROJECT · 15
1 post
Move @CinemactFess
@CinemactFess · 6
1 post
COAST FESS: OPEN!
@CoastFess · 3,262
1 post
CORTIS #365TUNEOFCORTIS
@CortisProject · 1,585
1 post
YELTSIN:ㅤ冥縁 ㅤ🀄
@CoterieOfYeltsin · 4,224
1 post
DEAREST WONYOUNG. #22PrintsOfWonyoung / 💋
@DearestWonyoung · 51
1 post
Delmeist Familie: Home of the Miraculous Remedium.
@Delmeist · 6,623
1 post
Cosmic Dominion: Geisler Family Chronicles.
@GeislerVoyager · 12,289
1 post
The Face Of Tomorrow: HEELIARCH.
@Heeliarch · 1,797
1 post
HOLMES BASE: INCOSS OLDWAVES.
@HolmesBase · 42,258
1 post
Memoranda of Peculiar Souls : House for Elmswythe
@HouseForElmswythe · 3,414
1 post
The Twilight Labyrinth Of: La Sönnaille ˳ ♪ .࣪
@LaSonnaille · 3,456
1 post
27 Tahun Bersemi, Li Landi.
@LandiSwoon · 4
1 post
+1 MAIN ROUTE : TO HOME.
@MRTHome · 71
1 post
Roselain: The Garden of Words.
@MeadowOfRoselain · 2,428
1 post
Persona Of Prestige.
@PersonaOfPrestige · 2,652
1 post
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑏𝑦 𝑅𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑠𝑚𝑒.
@Redesme · 443
1 post
#SangahSwingsInto24
@SangahBirthday · 1
1 post
SERENA: SUMMER ESCAPE OF ROMANOVNA & PEARCE.
@SunlitSerena · 77
1 post
Ever Faithfully, Noihre.
@TheNoihre · 4,818
1 post
Tune the Ideas! #TuneThatTuide
@Tuideas · 48
1 post
WARTA WARGA.
@WartaWargaa · 7,065
1 post
WHIB, ON! #Leejeong23rdAmpedNight.
@Whibbon · 3
1 post
Arcana of Fate, Li Yunrui.
@WhispersOfYunrui · 2
1 post
Wishes 𝑓𝑜𝑟 GFriend. #YeSisterGelatoJourney.
@WishesforGFriend · 25
1 post
ATHEARLYS #SqueakNahyunDay.
@athearlys · 96
1 post
Kittage. #LeesolRollsTo21
@kittage · 286
1 post
SSERA.FILE
@sserafiles · 136
1 post
TWIBBAEZ #Dear21stPharita.
@twibbaez · 188
1 post
TXT PROJECT #𝘚𝘦𝘵𝘴𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘏𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘪
@txtproject · 114
1 post
WAYTWIBBON: #VisionWings.
@wayvtwibbon · 22
1 post
ZB1 PROJECT. #ZB1TracksToExistence
@zb1project · 49
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PAGUYFESS.” (@PAGUYFESS), 33,485 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PAGUYFESS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.