Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
PAGUYFESS.
@PAGUYFESS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
33,485subscribers
+873 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001768206036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PAGUYFESS |
| Description | Let the melodies drift beneath the striking blue sky, where summer breezes carry stories from one soul to another. ☻☀️ On Duty: @ Complaints: @KrisarPF_Bot. Twibbon: @PFTwibbonBot. Official Bot: @.PaguyFess_Bot. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PAGUYFESS |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 33,485 | +80 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 33,405 | +10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 33,395 | +20 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 33,375 | +99 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 33,276 | +25 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 33,251 | +61 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 33,190 | +100 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 33,090 | +29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 33,061 | +30 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:07 | 33,031 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:26 | 33,049 | +21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 33,028 | +37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 32,991 | +14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 32,977 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 32,971 | +49 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 32,922 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 32,912 | +67 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 32,845 | +37 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 32,808 | +26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 32,782 | first reading |
Engagement
919 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.844%
- avg views ÷ 33,485 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 283
- 412 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.13%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 412
- of 919 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 72 of 412 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 919 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 116,493 |
| Reactions total | 256 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,920
- Videos
- ≈761
- Links
- ≈8,810
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 12s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
705 reactions across 166 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 391 | 55.5% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 9.50% | |
| 🏆 | 65 | 9.22% | |
| ❤🔥 | 62 | 8.79% | |
| ⚡ | 36 | 5.11% | |
| 💋 | 24 | 3.40% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 2.84% | |
| 🍓 | 19 | 2.70% | |
| 🆒 | 9 | 1.28% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 0.851% | |
| 🦄 | 6 | 0.851% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 193 of the 919 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 919 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 919 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PAGUYFESS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 919 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ㅤㅤ The last menfess has been delivered, and the queue is finally empty. That means it’s time for Indigo to say goodbye for today’s shift! Thank you for allowing me to be a small part of your day today. Whether you sent a menfess, leave a trace, or simply stopped by, your presence is always appreciated. It has been a pleasure spending this shift with you, Pepssie! If you need to submit a report or if your account has …
❤3
Sticker, posted without a caption
hi we looking for peeps who using hearts2hearts, tws, cortis and tuide! ♥️
ㅤㅤ ㅤSprig grows red, faded in sweet autumn. ㅤAll you've had was roots and a small ㅤhope for it not to be forgotten. Are you ㅤletting the season shifted in blurs? ㅤㅤ❀ To SEVENTEEN's Dreamers: ㅤㅤYOON JEONGHAN x JOSHUA HONG. ㅤㅤ───────────────────────── ㅤㅤ
CALLING ALL RIIZE ANTON PORTRAYERS TO JOIN AND BUILD OUR DORM WITH SFS SYSTEM! We have decided what kind of concept we're willing to use, just some more preparation. Hop in if you have the willingness, we're waiting for you.
CALLING OUT FOR ALL GEN 4&5 MUSES, LET'S JOIN WITH US, yang suka yapping, talktive yang ga stuck HI doang! If you think you’d fit in, klik this link for join!
Send more, yuk!
Our upcoming circle is currently seeking Park Seah & Martin Edwards. Prospective members are expected to maintain good communication, engage in group discussions, remain committed to their muse, and contribute meaningfully as we build the circle together. The circle will also operate under an sfs system.
❤3
ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤGREDSSÉ GATE STANDS OPEN ㅤ Through the shrouded mist and crooked woods, a forsaken gate has finally creaked ajar. Beyond its ancient threshold lies a realm steeped in silence—where wandering souls traverse without destination, forgotten whispers linger within the gloom, and something primordial watches from beyond the veil. Tonight, the gates of Gredsse are unsealed. Step forth. Forsake the mortal path. Cross…
❤2
calling out NEWJEANS & TREASURE RP-ers 💬 (non-twins, wo sfs system)
Freedom joins us, exciting adventures accompanied by laughter together. Our fair, just hand exist ready in the direction of support your freedom. CALLING ALL TWS–RPERS to join us.
Showing the 12 most recent of 919 posts we hold for @PAGUYFESS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What session should we open this afternoon?
- Menfess Sessions.51%
- Campfire Sessions.57%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 919 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@ivenation · 105 postsThe Hall of Xianyu: Lóuzhen Lingxiu
@HeavenOfLouzhen · 8,7784 postsLóuzhen Familia.
@louzhens · 244 postsCool Moms.
@CoolMommas · 193 postsOeschnerz.
@TheOeschner · 63 postsKOSTAN TUJUH BELAS
@kojubel · 863 posts(PAGUY) ESTREON: Estrella de Rock Of Keonho.
@ESTREON · 2,7422 postsYsrl
@debonoir · 12 postsTrinity of Tawny.
@trioftawny · 402 posts𐌘,5 BËRG: Wyrmthane of the Frostmarch.
@ChroniclesOfBerg · 9,8771 postarcip roji
@RojiArchives · 161 postThe Illustrious Bloodline: La Famiglia Sullivan.
@TheSullivans · 2431 postCHIPMUNK UNIVERSE.
@aChiverse · 661 postGyushion's Archive.
@gyushionn · 41 post𝙇 's 𝙃𝙤𝙢𝙚
@kohsehun · 221 postkumons! :o
@kumons · 531 postLiesbon’s Somi.
@liesbonsomi · 21 postSumDive's Helper.
@sumdivee1 postThe Mirthful; 𝐑𝐮𝐛𝐲𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐡.
@therubyseth · 3831 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@RHYTHMOFBND · 2943 postsTHREADS BASE ©
@ThreadsBase · 3132 postsCLO’VER Project.
@CLO_VERPROJECT · 151 postMove @CinemactFess
@CinemactFess · 61 postCOAST FESS: OPEN!
@CoastFess · 3,2621 postCORTIS #365TUNEOFCORTIS
@CortisProject · 1,5851 postYELTSIN:ㅤ冥縁 ㅤ🀄
@CoterieOfYeltsin · 4,2241 postDEAREST WONYOUNG. #22PrintsOfWonyoung / 💋
@DearestWonyoung · 511 postDelmeist Familie: Home of the Miraculous Remedium.
@Delmeist · 6,6231 postCosmic Dominion: Geisler Family Chronicles.
@GeislerVoyager · 12,2891 postThe Face Of Tomorrow: HEELIARCH.
@Heeliarch · 1,7971 postHOLMES BASE: INCOSS OLDWAVES.
@HolmesBase · 42,2581 postMemoranda of Peculiar Souls : House for Elmswythe
@HouseForElmswythe · 3,4141 postThe Twilight Labyrinth Of: La Sönnaille ˳ ♪ .࣪
@LaSonnaille · 3,4561 post27 Tahun Bersemi, Li Landi.
@LandiSwoon · 41 post+1 MAIN ROUTE : TO HOME.
@MRTHome · 711 postRoselain: The Garden of Words.
@MeadowOfRoselain · 2,4281 postPersona Of Prestige.
@PersonaOfPrestige · 2,6521 post𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑏𝑦 𝑅𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑠𝑚𝑒.
@Redesme · 4431 post#SangahSwingsInto24
@SangahBirthday · 11 postSERENA: SUMMER ESCAPE OF ROMANOVNA & PEARCE.
@SunlitSerena · 771 postEver Faithfully, Noihre.
@TheNoihre · 4,8181 postTune the Ideas! #TuneThatTuide
@Tuideas · 481 postWARTA WARGA.
@WartaWargaa · 7,0651 postWHIB, ON! #Leejeong23rdAmpedNight.
@Whibbon · 31 postArcana of Fate, Li Yunrui.
@WhispersOfYunrui · 21 postWishes 𝑓𝑜𝑟 GFriend. #YeSisterGelatoJourney.
@WishesforGFriend · 251 postATHEARLYS #SqueakNahyunDay.
@athearlys · 961 postKittage. #LeesolRollsTo21
@kittage · 2861 postSSERA.FILE
@sserafiles · 1361 postTWIBBAEZ #Dear21stPharita.
@twibbaez · 1881 postTXT PROJECT #𝘚𝘦𝘵𝘴𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘏𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘪
@txtproject · 1141 postWAYTWIBBON: #VisionWings.
@wayvtwibbon · 221 postZB1 PROJECT. #ZB1TracksToExistence
@zb1project · 491 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ESTREON · 2,7424 postsTelegram Usernames
@username · 1,323,5934 postsCORTOPIA. #START.
@CORTOPIA · 1,2773 postsLIST PAGUY PF.
@ListPaguyPF · 7973 postsPaguyFess’ Guidebook.
@PFGuidebook · 63 postsTHE BOYNEXTDOOR: #ASpoonfulOfSungho
@RHYTHMOFBND · 2943 postsTHREADS BASE ©
@ThreadsBase · 3133 postsW!SH.EXE: The Champion Is Us.
@WishExe · 1,7483 postsMove @CinemactFess
@CinemactFess · 62 postsCOAST FESS: OPEN!
@CoastFess · 3,2622 postsYELTSIN:ㅤ冥縁 ㅤ🀄
@CoterieOfYeltsin · 4,2242 postsHOUSE OF IGNAREV: The Ashen Shadow Theatre.
@FlameOfIgnarev · 9,3222 postsKEONTRACK: THE REVIVAL.
@KEONTRACK · 5,3792 postsThe Twilight Labyrinth Of: La Sönnaille ˳ ♪ .࣪
@LaSonnaille · 3,4562 postsDOOR TO MAJORFESS.
@majorfess · 5002 postsMEURNOTT
@meurnott · 5,6182 postsThe Tale of Mondcroft: Where Every Bunny Belongs.
@Mondcroft · 4,1642 postsThe Eternal Bond: String Of Scarvaine.
@StringOfScarvaine · 9,7062 postsTHE ODYSSEANS: Scions of Unseen Fate.
@TheOdysseans · 12,0022 postsVERSE OF ARTISTS: #365TUNEOFVEORTIST
@VerseOfArtists · 5,7972 posts𐌘,5 BËRG: Wyrmthane of the Frostmarch.
@ChroniclesOfBerg · 9,8771 postKeeper of the Jade Court: Liu (刘).
@JadeOfLiu · 10,3641 postKittage. #LeesolRollsTo21
@kittage · 2861 postSSERA.FILE
@sserafiles · 1361 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@PAGUYFESS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PAGUYFESS.” (@PAGUYFESS), 33,485 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PAGUYFESS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.