United States Geological Survey (USGS) DEFUSE records obtained via FOIA by USRTK https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/USGS-DEFUSE-2021-006245-Combined-Records_Redacted.pdf @P0P0P1P0
![Telegram profile photo for [P]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/8a/8a90e379828334c303330c8d12699342e6983d71b3be9b9ad382a342b2f7041d.jpg)
Channel
[P]
@P0P0P1P0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
140subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001534958978 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @P0P0P1P0 |
| Description | [Research_Vault] |
| Created | 14 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/P0P0P1P0 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 140 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 140 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 590
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 356
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/american-scientists-misled-pentagon-on-wuhan-research/ @P0P0P1P0
PROJECT DEFUSE Draft with edit commentary of Peter Daszak (PD) and Ralph Baric (BRS) Obtained by USRTK: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2021-006245-Combined-Records_Redacted-1-235.pdf @P0P0P1P0
Kind of funny that E. Holmes refers to Peter Daszak as the "Grand Wizard of EgoHealth" while at the same time revealing in the same conversation that Ian Lipkin is the go-to guy for US intelligence and „higher ups“ while they were all also concerned about FCS being the smoking gun for the lab leak. @P0P0P1P0
The Biden administration has halted the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s (WIV) access to federal funding after the lab failed to provide documents about safety and security measures regarding risky research projects. DHHS: “This action will ensure the WIV does not receive another dollar of federal funding.” 3.5 years late to the party. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-18/us-suspends-wuhan-institute-fun…
„House Republicans on the subcommittee probing the origin of the Covid-19 virus appear to have inadvertently released a trove of new documents related to their investigation that shed light on deliberations among the scientists who drafted a key paper in February and March of 2020. The paper, published in Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, was titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” and played a leading role in cr…
David Morens NIH FOIA’d emails: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23863749-david_morens_nih_emails_redacted @P0P0P1P0
“A Top Adviser to Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes of Health admitted that he used a personal email account in an apparent effort to evade the strictures of the Freedom of Information Act, according to records obtained by congressional investigators probing the origin of Covid-19. The official also expressed his intention to delete emails in order to avoid media scrutiny. “As you know, I try to always commun…
https://twitter.com/jamesctobias/status/1673403109601583113?s=28 @P0P0P1P0
New hACE2 mice dropped in 2022 (paper published June 2023) https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2207210120 @P0P0P1P0
3 New State Department FOIA‘s obtained by USRTK (heavily redacted) - US State Department discussing possible classified PLA projects in Wuhan https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/FL-2022-00075-April-2023-Production-cable-1.pdf https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/FL-2022-00075-May-2023-Production-memo.pdf https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/FL-2022-00075-April-2023-Production-ccp.pdf @P0…
Sometimes it rhymes. Apparent artificial SARS1 strain - 2007 Flu Season SARS2 - Flu season :)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @P0P0P1P0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[P]” (@P0P0P1P0), 140 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/P0P0P1P0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.