本five寻思诈骗犯犯了事被戳穿一般都事躲起来的罢,反观莉莉女士还恬不知耻地石硬坚称本频道为造谣tv,可见其作为诈骗犯心态之强硬,若是评个厚脸皮等级的话或许都可以与梁硕一起拍到长城级。可惜本频道并不会对仅仅退了两千三的说谎话不打草稿的诈骗犯作丝毫的妥协,如果想要撤回条目的话就归还恁频道的所有诈骗所得。对于恁这种死妈人物野爹们暂且没有将恁开户就已经事天大的慈悲,谢绝诈骗犯莉莉女士继续石硬脱粪送妈,3q2x
👍2

Channel
@Overdosedog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
204subscribers
+89 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004253283242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Overdosedog |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 10 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Overdosedog |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 204 | +21 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 183 | +46 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 137 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 135 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 132 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 133 | +12 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 121 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 115 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 115 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
12 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
本five寻思诈骗犯犯了事被戳穿一般都事躲起来的罢,反观莉莉女士还恬不知耻地石硬坚称本频道为造谣tv,可见其作为诈骗犯心态之强硬,若是评个厚脸皮等级的话或许都可以与梁硕一起拍到长城级。可惜本频道并不会对仅仅退了两千三的说谎话不打草稿的诈骗犯作丝毫的妥协,如果想要撤回条目的话就归还恁频道的所有诈骗所得。对于恁这种死妈人物野爹们暂且没有将恁开户就已经事天大的慈悲,谢绝诈骗犯莉莉女士继续石硬脱粪送妈,3q2x
👍2
https://fxtwitter.com/Nanwhju/status/2057661451872125082
顺带一提,此壬连频道里的胶囊照片都要偷取网图,过于奇妙深刻,,,看来恁圈的梁性循环事不会停止的罢
用户昵称:Morikawa Ayako/Jack Cooper 诈骗账号: X:@Shiroskura TG:Jack Cooper 圈名:莉莉 诈骗事迹简述:早在蝾马大战期间此壬便卷几千usdt跑路,然而其每次都能一瞬删评导致其于六月十七日疯狂回归,开创INFINITY-RC货架频道开始送妈,售卖35u/22mg的4-ho-met,并在售卖ic26时进行杀熟,声称预定顺丰发货68粒40mg的1161,最终却二度卷走两千三百元,删除账号,最逃逸的壬。不仅如此,因其贩卖天价ic26,其还曾经黑屁过ic26的拼团者,诅咒他们o死,倒卖药商的嘴脸此刻毕露无疑。笔者认为,此惯犯应当已然以不少的皮囊诈骗力不小的数额。
👍1👏1💯1
用户昵称:bo 真实姓名:于宗波 诈骗账号 TG:bo 诈骗事迹简述:在TG群内称自己有普瑞巴林、右美沙芬、曲马多等药物,在收取费用后又要求添加邮费,诈骗总金额不详。 #编号5 #于宗波
原料革命交流群 避免被圈钱的最好办法
用户昵称:卡卡洛特 真实姓名:坑魏泽洋 诈骗账号 QQ: 2513709343 3364450760 抖音: 72097947295 42263812779 诈骗事迹简述:此人已再次回归圈钱中,详情信息请浏览编号3。 #编号3 #坑魏泽洋
用户昵称:目测 真实姓名:梁硕 诈骗账号 TG:目测 诈骗事迹简述:图中账号为梁硕小号,详情信息请浏览标签编号1。 #编号1 #梁硕
用户昵称:喵喵鱼 真实姓名:蒙宇 诈骗账号 推特:xiomngy1176317 TG:@ymprmmy 诈骗事迹简述:与凌毅合伙在OD群内称自己有普瑞原粉和药厂提供愈美,进行多次诈骗后在6月1日跑路,具体金额未统计。 #编号4 #蒙宇
❤4
用户昵称:卡卡洛特 真实姓名:坑魏泽洋 诈骗账号 QQ: 2513709343 3364450760 抖音: 72097947295 42263812779 诈骗事迹简述:在QQ与抖音售卖愈美、白兔、普瑞等药物。被诈骗人数高达百余人,据估计前后共骗取两万元,单笔诈骗最高金额为500元。 #编号3 #坑魏泽洋
🤮3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Overdosedog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Overdosedog named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OD圈诈骗公示” (@Overdosedog), 204 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Overdosedog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.