Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Orphen Sirius

@OrphenSirius13

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,059subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001529987470
TypeChannel
Username@OrphenSirius13
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OrphenSirius13

Growth

1,0521,0591,055.56 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,053 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,059 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,051–1,060 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:171,059+4
11 Aug 2026, 22:451,055+2
9 Aug 2026, 05:501,053+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:511,052no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:011,052first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
93.6%
avg views ÷ 1,059 subscribers
Avg views / post
991
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held12 (23 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total11,897
Reactions total1,089
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,089 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
54349.9%
🔥22220.4%
❤‍🔥21820.0%
🥰444.04%
💔252.30%
😍171.56%
👍60.551%
🎃40.367%
👀20.184%
👏20.184%
🤩20.184%
10.092%
🍓10.092%
🗿10.092%
😇10.092%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,089reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 12 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OrphenSirius13. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC367 views77 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как вы могли догадаться - я таки буду на Фурмаркете https://t.me/furr_market ) Билеты у них кстати еще остались, кто забыл) а этот рисунок - это такой вот стенд будет там ждать всех, кто будет в тот день) (для тех, кто недавно или не знает - данный персонаж на рисунке это маскот фурмаркета и персонаж Райс, а то мало ли путаница будет какая)

49❤‍🔥21🔥5🗿1😇1

2 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC493 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ирма, днд клирик для Баньши)) https://t.me/iiypra

42❤‍🔥11🔥6👀2

31 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC511 views94 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

наверное последняя атака все-таки за этот артфайт это на Петра https://t.me/zond_er_art

75🔥15🎃4

30 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC708 views117 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

а еще вот такая вот девочка для artfight.net/~Sinasni

❤‍🔥71🔥20😍1511

30 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,320 views138 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

а вот такая вот рисунка получилась для https://t.me/nellorain_art ))

96🔥27❤‍🔥15

30 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC583 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ааа спонсор моей продуктивности и малого сна - больной зуб)) вы не думаете что жалуюсь, я уже неделю назад ходила раз к врачу - прописали от воспаления антибиотики пропить сначала, теперь вот сегодня заложили лекарство и закрыли и потом после 17го числа будут уже нормальную пломбу ставить, удовольствие мягко скажем для богатых, но лучше так чем мучиться с зубом) так что да)) чтобы как раз не думать про больной зуб -

💔256

30 Jul 2026, 04:22 UTC≈1,330 views156 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

для t.me/imanikaart Иманики немного летнего вайба

🔥7854🥰12❤‍🔥9😍2🍓1

28 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC≈1,270 views96 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

вот такая вот девочка набросалась для t.me/birmit_art

64🔥24👍6🤩2

28 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC621 views143 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

моя ответка на артфайте для https://t.me/FrayvuirArt

❤‍🔥7842🥰20🔥3

24 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC683 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @furr_marketPhoto

Розыгрыш 2 билетов на ФурМаркет! На этот раз в ТГ. Для участия нужно: 1. Вступить в канал. 2. Написать + или любой другой комментарий к этой записи. Результаты 30 июля! Напоминаем также, что Супер-VIP билеты продаются до конца недели и в розыгрышах не участвуют! Если хотите освежающий летний мерч, то покупайте билетик.

🔥115❤‍🔥2👏2

23 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC≈3,210 views98 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

и наконец покажу свою ПЕРВУЮ атаку в этом году на артфайте. так получилось, что я придумала идею еще в июне) до дедлайна)) и вот она у меня солилась) и дошло до того что я решила массово атаковать художников) сслки на авторов сверху вниз по персонажам)) на кого нападала) https://t.me/julie_talk t.me/amishy_swamp https://t.me/shimmer_paradise https://t.me/sugar_dump https://t.me/rrushascorner

59🔥26🥰121

23 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC801 views58 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

поделюсь еще атаками НА меня! и я наконец сдала номер и еще сдала пару макетов и тоже могу врываться на последних числах, ха) ну а пока что, вот те, кто нападал) https://artfight.net/~Sinasni https://artfight.net/~T-N-T https://artfight.net/~PurpleYeen https://artfight.net/~Azzoos https://artfight.net/~Katzenliebhaben

40❤‍🔥11🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @OrphenSirius13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 63,234 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Orphen Sirius” (@OrphenSirius13), 1,059 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrphenSirius13.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.