Channel
@Orchedor
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
449subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002231752081 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Orchedor |
| Description | ㅤㅤ Sweet And Heavy-lidded; The youthful hue. Gilliflower coddled by the smooches upon swallowtails fluttering about it, betwixt sauntering about this frolicsome vestibule, likewise amorous birds of @OrchedFoliate. Roll sweetnest at @OrcheRobot. ㅤㅤ |
| Created | 28 July 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Orchedor |
@Orchedor was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 449 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 449 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 28 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
148 reactions across 6 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 32 | 21.6% | |
| 👏 | 28 | 18.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 11.5% | |
| 🎉 | 13 | 8.78% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 8.11% | |
| 🆒 | 10 | 6.76% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 4.73% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 4.05% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 4.05% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 3.38% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 3.38% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 2.70% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 1.35% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.676% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2024 to 16 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello @durov i would like to convey that, there is no action that violates the terms and conditions of telegram here, i hope, telegram has a wise way, in managing problems, before doing strict action, such as banning/ blocking a telegram channel, thank you
Sticker, posted without a caption
HAPPY BIRTHDAY ISALEE, AND ISA’s ORCHEDOR. 💖
❤3🎉2🔥2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Reminder, Orchies! Don't forget to fulfill your mensive into our chatbox. Also, if you want to unsubs this channel please come to our to confirm where are you from and how many your account is so we can do the same thing on yours.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Our main characterr!! 🫰🏻
They play their respective characters; the chick will sing with her beloved silver microphone plus her characteristic melodious voice. Likewise with the guy who would play guitar with the blue guitar that he always brought to the gig, it also seemed that it was his favorite thing. ‘And you need to know, they are our lovely characters.
🔥4🤩4🎉3💋3🕊3❤2🍾2🆒2
Sticker, posted without a caption
👏9🔥6🎉3
ㅤㅤ Upon the essential of clinquant eventide empyrean viz beauteous allied solely immaculate nescency. Pendulous against the torch near sidewalk which emanate luminosity, forth the asphalt, frolic amidst puissant accomplishment, agility, and etiquette accompanied by a beating heart. Dyadic couplet of eyes which equitable each other's scrutinize amidst a reconnaissance lavish of fondness and solicitude viz convenient …
🔥8🍓7👏7🆒7❤🔥5🥰5🤩2⚡1
ㅤㅤ Bone gedryht's records bang in a anguished voice (The tones—nix blemish—endeavor to coruscate) Amongst the sundry appellation viz exist, they attempt upon concatenation them collectively towards a melody. The columns of the broken record flatter solely, findan one-another. ✬ ㅤㅤ
👏10❤7🔥7❤🔥6💘4🕊3💋2🎉1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤🔥6🔥5🎉3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Orchedor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 847,236 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Orchedor named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Records of Juvenile: Orched Sadoreil.” (@Orchedor), 449 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Orchedor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.