Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OralMed | Пародонтология

Channel

OralMed | Пародонтология

@OrallMed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

2,641subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001979417320
TypeChannel
Username@OrallMed
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OrallMed

Growth

2,6282,6412,634.57 August 2026 — 2,629 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,629 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,628 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,630 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,638 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,641 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 15 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,626–2,643 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 09:372,641+3
18 Aug 2026, 23:452,638+8
15 Aug 2026, 15:542,630+2
12 Aug 2026, 04:182,628-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:472,629no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:332,629first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 2,641 subscribers
Avg views / post
446
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held12 (24 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,783
Reactions total137
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

346 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12736.7%
10730.9%
🔥5014.5%
277.80%
👀195.49%
🙈123.47%
🤓20.578%
🤔10.289%
🤯10.289%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC554 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026

5000 ppm: откуда взялось это число? Прежде чем сравнивать высокофторидные пасты между собой, я бы остановился на самом числе. Почему именно 5000 и что за ним стоит? Корни уходят в конец 1970-х. Именно тогда группа ученых под руководством Dreizen работала с онкопациентами, которые прошли лучевую терапию головы и шеи и имели высокую интенсивность кариеса. Пациентам ежедневно наносили 1% нейтральный гель фторида натр

👍5516🔥115

24 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC432 viewsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо всем, кто проголосовал и написал свои комментарии Я составил свой рейтинг высокофторидных средств гигиены 5000 ppm, но сначала несколько важных, как мне кажется, моментов 👇

20 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC599 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Если назначаете, то какую

  1. Duraphat57%
  2. VOC9%
  3. Стоматол43%
  4. Президент16%
  5. Есть свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)6%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC577 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Назначаете ли вы пасту с фторидами 5000 ppm? Давайте проголосуем реакциями 👍да, часто 👀да, редко 🙈никогда не назначаю

👍39👀16🙈11

16 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC738 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сборная таблица с диф диагнозом Эрозивная форма плоского лишая и Эритематозный кандидоз

13👍7🔥6🤓2

13 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC847 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лечение гиперестезии: если пасты и ополаскиватели не помогли На сегодняшний день есть такая логика ведения пациентов с гиперестезией: сначала самый простой способ — десенситирующие пасты и ополаскиватели, которые или блокируют вход в дентинные канальцы, или гасят передачу нервного сигнала, а затем кабинетный уровень. Свежие данные (ссылки в конце поста👇) по отдалённой эффективности кабинетных десенситайзеров показы

17🔥85👍3

2 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC820 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вторая часть карточек по кандидозу (первая была тут) Клиника-тактика-прогноз

156👀3🔥2

28 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,080 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сколько стоит пародонтология относительно лечения кариеса? Вопрос ценообразования в пародонтологии часто упирается в восприятие: профессиональное снятие зубных отложений, над- и поддесневое, часто мысленно ставят ниже «настоящего» лечения. Я решил проверить это не на ощущениях, а на цифрах. Взял из открытых источников официальные тарифы, гос. референс-цены и данные отраслевых опросов за 2024–2026. Чтобы цифры стали

👍17🔥108🙈1

24 Jun 2026, 14:00 UTC787 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬Давайте проголосуем, а потом сравним ответы с собранными международными данными

5🔥43🤔1

24 Jun 2026, 13:59 UTC794 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Сколько в этой же логике стоит поддесневая инструментальная обработка в области 1 сегмента в вашей клинике?

  1. менее 25%12%
  2. 25%-50%23%
  3. 50-100%30%
  4. 100-150%21%
  5. более 150%15%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3👍3🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @OrallMed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTCAnonymous Poll97 voters

Если назначаете, то какую

  1. Duraphat57%
  2. VOC9%
  3. Стоматол43%
  4. Президент16%
  5. Есть свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)6%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Jun 2026, 13:59 UTCAnonymous Poll102 voters

Сколько в этой же логике стоит поддесневая инструментальная обработка в области 1 сегмента в вашей клинике?

  1. менее 25%12%
  2. 25%-50%23%
  3. 50-100%30%
  4. 100-150%21%
  5. более 150%15%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OralMed | Пародонтология” (@OrallMed), 2,641 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrallMed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.