Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ex Open Project

@OpenCoinCommunity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,209subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002108762964
TypeChannel
Username@OpenCoinCommunity
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OpenCoinCommunity

Growth

1,2091,2151,2126 August 2026 — 1,215 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,215 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,209 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,208–1,216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:531,209-6
7 Aug 2026, 00:201,215no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:311,215first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

698 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎21430.7%
👍15622.3%
🔥15321.9%
11416.3%
🎉568.02%
🍾50.716%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 698reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2024 to 25 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Apr 2025, 05:48 UTC860 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Support has been discontinued. During the year of the project's existence, about 50% of revenue was spent on marketing. another 35% was spent on employee salaries and other project expenses. our ideas do not make sense on the TON blockchain. what we came here with is not shared by the audience. we implemented the services ecosystem first as an MVP, then as a really working infrastructure, but did not get a response

👎73🎉2👍2

12 Jan 2025, 15:24 UTC≈1,540 views104 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Happy birthday. 8,760 hours, 365 days, 12 months, 1 year. that's how long it's been since the post “OpenCoin launched online” was published. It's been a long year. we remember a lot of things. the very first airdrop - yes, it was fun. we remember how a joke gave birth to the idea we've been guarding for 525,600 minutes now. the idea of a decentralized future of web3 and an ecosystem of services where everyone is fr

👎84👍87🍾2🔥2🎉1

4 Nov 2024, 16:12 UTC≈1,630 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

OpenViewer x TRP TON REALITY PROTOCOL is one of the most interesting technologies in our project. We would like to tell you more about it. Well. OpenViewer will be the first TON service to support TON REALITY PROTOCOL. As we said, the protocol will be completely open (amazing, right?) for third-party developers to use. We will provide the React library “ton-reality-protocol”, a set of API methods, opcodes, and all

👍6👎53🔥2

3 Nov 2024, 15:41 UTC≈1,150 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

TON Reality Protocol (TRP) What our team does is not just GameFi. Now it's also unique tools for third-party developers. For example, the protocol “TON Reality Protocol”, developed by us, allows to work with a unique NFT-platform, which allows to load into NFT-model data not only an image, name and other fields of cells, but also a full 3D model. We will implement opcodes for blockchain operations with such structu

👍11👎92🔥2

27 Oct 2024, 09:29 UTC≈1,320 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026

An Introduction to the Future. 👽 We are pleased to present a form for applying to collaborate with Open Project GameFi applications, based on our own NFT platform. At the moment we accept almost every collaboration proposal. Perhaps it is your proposal that we are waiting for. Hurry up. Submit a request: https://forms.gle/hw9LSTcgHFZT4Zo1A

👎56👍31

11 Oct 2024, 17:19 UTC≈1,230 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Boost. Just what our team has been waiting for the last few weeks. We have boosted the OPEN/TON trading pair liquidity pool by 56,000 $OPEN tokens. 🥺 This “action” will help to properly prioritize crypto investors regarding contributions to the trading pair liquidity pools.🧐

👎133👍1🔥1

11 Oct 2024, 04:48 UTC≈1,130 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Changes. Change is not always something global, but it leads to unexpected results. Open Project - Research. Researching the TON blockchain in an attempt to carve out a niche for itself. Introducing the first post in the redesign. Font change on Unbounded. 🥺

👎14🔥102👍1

26 Sept 2024, 16:28 UTC≈1,270 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Change is an indicator of development. 🤫 Our team believes exactly that. The team of founders and employees has been completely re-formed. We are preparing something interesting.

👎14🔥82👍2

6 Sept 2024, 16:33 UTC≈10,700 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

OPEN PROJECT x HYDRA Рады напомнить, что у OpenCoin и HYDRA существует совместный пул ликвидности, позволяющий холдерам обоих проектов получать пассивный доход. Благодаря системе liquidity pool rewards от DeDust HYDRA реализовали фарминг своих токенов за пополнение пула ликвидности торговых пар дружественных проектов. Пополнение пула доступно здесь: https://dedust.io/pools/EQCFUOIgKk2fIHCX7jPhbE58aUuFZgZbqt95Uekp

👍9🎉6👎3🔥31

26 Jul 2024, 09:51 UTC≈1,910 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

OpenViewer — флагманский продукт Open Project. Мы понимаем и принимаем ответственность и риски, связанные с масштабными продуктами. Развитие — вот вектор, который обязан принять любой проект. Наша команда — не исключение. Многие месяцы мы перерабатывали концепцию стандартного обозревателя блокчейна и создали лучший для пользователей — OpenViewer 2.0. Принять участие в тестировании можно уже сейчас. Следите за об

👍19🔥74

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OpenCoinCommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 814,123 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ex Open Project” (@OpenCoinCommunity), 1,209 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OpenCoinCommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.