Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Market-Tools.Net

Channel

Market-Tools.Net

@OnlineTradingSolution

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,169subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611789674
TypeChannel
Username@OnlineTradingSolution
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/OnlineTradingSolution

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@forexshopnet/530912 Jun 2026, 13:53 UTC@OnlineTradingSolution/5932 · this entry12 Jun 2026, 13:54 UTC1.00under a minute
@forexshopnet/531520 Jun 2026, 13:06 UTC@OnlineTradingSolution/5938 · this entry20 Jun 2026, 13:06 UTC1.00under a minute
@forexshopnet/531622 Jun 2026, 15:03 UTC@OnlineTradingSolution/5939 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 15:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@forexshopnet/53194 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC@OnlineTradingSolution/5942 · this entry4 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@forexshopnet/53204 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC@OnlineTradingSolution/5943 · this entry4 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@OnlineTradingSolution/5948 · this entry12 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC@forexshopnet/532512 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@forexshopnet7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@forexshopnet (6–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 June 2026 to 21 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @forexshopnet. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,1161,1691,142.57 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,131 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,130 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,127 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,123 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,123 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,123 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,125 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,119 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,116 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,132 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,138 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,140 subscribers18 October 2026 — 1,139 subscribers25 October 2026 — 1,140 subscribers28 October 2026 — 1,142 subscribers31 October 2026 — 1,148 subscribers3 November 2026 — 1,151 subscribers6 November 2026 — 1,154 subscribers10 November 2026 — 1,160 subscribers15 November 2026 — 1,169 subscribers7 August 202615 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 100 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,108–1,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Nov 2026, 01:101,169+9
10 Nov 2026, 07:391,160+6
6 Nov 2026, 22:301,154+3
3 Nov 2026, 18:091,151+3
31 Oct 2026, 20:471,148+6
28 Oct 2026, 10:261,142+2
25 Oct 2026, 08:071,140+1
18 Oct 2026, 18:301,139-1
12 Oct 2026, 05:381,140+2
5 Oct 2026, 20:151,138+6
27 Sept 2026, 23:551,132+16
18 Sept 2026, 12:381,116-3
10 Sept 2026, 19:171,119-6
5 Sept 2026, 18:581,125+2
1 Sept 2026, 11:041,123-1
29 Aug 2026, 21:071,124+2
27 Aug 2026, 03:461,122-1
23 Aug 2026, 21:251,123+1
20 Aug 2026, 14:261,122-1
17 Aug 2026, 19:151,123first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC150 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Pulse Engine MT5 V1.80-NoDLL www.mql5.com/en/market/product/165801 Expert: Pulse Engine.ex5 V1.80 (Unlocked NoDLL) Document: Info Monitoring: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2370727 FTMO Results https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/165801/comments#comment_59669413 Price: $19 Buy Now by Contacting Admin - @OnlinetradingsolutionSP Buy Now via Website - https://fx-tools.net/pulse-engine.html (Copy Paste URL in your …

14 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC249 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Gold Ace PRO Bundle (MT4 + MT5) www.xsmtrader.com Experts (Unlimited): Gold Ace PRO.ex4 Gold Ace PRO.ex5 Presets: -Default -PropFirm Documents: Userguide Price: $19 Buy Now Contact : @OnlineTradingSolutionSP

12 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC237 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Neuro Poseidon indicator​ for MT4 Vendor : www.neuroposeidon.com Original Price : $229 Neuro Poseidon is not just an indicator - it’s a game changer. As the very first product by Daria Rezueva, it sets a new standard with the most accurate signals on the market. Built to cut through noise and deliver clear, confident entries, Neuro Poseidon gives you the edge you’ve been looking for. Price $15 Contact : @OnlineTrad…

10 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC219 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NextPips https://t.me/nextpips Price : $17.99/Month $39/3 Month $70/Lifetime Please contact: @OnlineTradingSolutionSP

4 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC288 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Forex Fury EA MT4 V6 No DLL +Preset Vendor: https://www.forexfury.com Expert: Forex Fury EA MT4 V6.ex4 (Unlocked-NoDLL) Presets/. Setfiles Document: Info Monitoring: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/forexfuryreal Price: $9.99 Contact: @OnlineTradingSolutionSP

4 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC253 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Quantum Omni Gold MT5 V1. 8-NoDLL VENDOR : https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/183643 Expert: Quantum Omni Gold .ex5 (Unlocked NoDLL) Document: Info Price: $15 Contact: @OnlineTradingSolutionSP

22 Jun 2026, 15:03 UTC345 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Gold Sniper Bot MQ5 [Source Code] Fixed Stop Loss – 50 Pips Each trade incorporates a predefined stop loss to enhance risk control. ✅ High Profit Potential Targeted monthly returns are projected at 70% to 90%. ✅ Controlled Drawdown Estimated drawdown ranges from 10% to 20%. ✅ Low Capital Requirement Starts with as little as $100 using 0.01 lot sizes. ✅ Verified Live Performance Promoted as having achieved 100% p…

20 Jun 2026, 13:06 UTC315 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

WAVE RIDER EA V4.1 MT5 #Unlimited #MT5 #EA #nodll Working With new MT5 Terminal Vendor : https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/165897 Monitoring: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2361754 Price:$19 Contact : @OnlineTradingSolutionSP

14 Jun 2026, 08:28 UTC337 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Prop Guardian PRO V2 MT4 Vendor: https://t.me/downloadforex Price: $49 Contact : @OnlineTradingSolutionSP

12 Jun 2026, 13:54 UTC345 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NEUROSENTRA AI Trading System MT4 (No Repaint) Vendor: https://neurosentra.elementforex.com 1 Indicators. ex4 (Unlocked-NoDLL) 3 Templates Document : Info BONUS: 5 Indicators ex4 + 1 Template Price: $29 Contact : @OnlineTradingSolutionSP File Ready Instant

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @OnlineTradingSolution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FREE FX
@free_fx_pro · 19,691
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 October 2026
FX Cloud - Only 100% Free Forex EAs & Indicators
@vipforexcloud · 22,726
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 September 2026
Premium Forex EA(robot) And Indicators🏆🔱🏆
@forex_robot_Ea_indicators · 21,758
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Market-Tools.Net” (@OnlineTradingSolution), 1,169 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OnlineTradingSolution.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.