Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OnProfit CHANNEL

Channel

OnProfit CHANNEL

@OnProfitChannel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,885subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001774664068
TypeChannel
Username@OnProfitChannel
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OnProfitChannel

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8851,9391,9127 August 2026 — 1,939 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,939 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,938 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,935 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,931 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,928 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,922 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,918 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,914 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,912 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,908 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,900 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,895 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,885 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,877–1,947 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:391,885-10
14 Sept 2026, 16:591,895-5
10 Sept 2026, 19:211,900-8
5 Sept 2026, 12:151,908-4
1 Sept 2026, 19:441,912-2
29 Aug 2026, 21:121,914-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:461,915-3
24 Aug 2026, 14:271,918-4
20 Aug 2026, 12:461,922-6
17 Aug 2026, 18:571,928-3
14 Aug 2026, 12:181,931-4
10 Aug 2026, 23:111,935-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:431,938-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:311,939no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:231,939first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5735.6%
🤡3320.6%
😁2415.0%
💩85.00%
74.38%
🙏74.38%
👎63.75%
🤝53.13%
🐳31.88%
💯31.88%
🤣31.88%
🏆21.25%
😱21.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2025 to 28 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jun 2025, 14:40 UTC≈2,350 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уронил рейтинг до 1300 и после неплохой серии вернулся на 1500. Здесь кстати тоже частенько против тебя играют алгоботы)), вот только в Шахматах это считается читерством и наказывается в отличии от Трейдинга😄 Получается все МаркетМейкеры читеры?! Забанить их всех! 😂

🤡112🏆2👎1

25 Jun 2025, 16:39 UTC≈1,970 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Согласен с тем что заработать на Рынке стало сложнее чем раньше?

  1. Да, полностью согласен60%
  2. Ну не сказал бы что все так печально16%
  3. Нет, как рубил раньше бабки так и рублю сейчас7%
  4. Раньше только терял и сейчас теряю17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

25 Jun 2025, 16:37 UTC≈1,550 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И вот прошло совсем немного времени и мы видим на сколько стал сложным Рынок. Сложным для заработка. Все что работало раньше, либо не работает совсем, либо работает, но результаты оставляют желать лучшего. Думаю каждый из тех кто торгует хотя бы несколько лет, это мог заметить.

👍8🤡4💯3

25 Jun 2025, 16:33 UTC≈1,420 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Примерно пару лет назад я общался с человеком который уже на тот момент работал над такими алгоритмами. В ходе беседы я делился с ним своими Трейдами и неплохой статистикой на тот момент, на что он мне сказал: Как бы хорошо ты не торговал сейчас, время работает против тебя.

25 Jun 2025, 16:22 UTC≈1,370 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Причина такой статистики крайне проста. Против нас (толпы) торгующих руками, уже давным давно торгуют алгоритмические боты. Там нет эмоций, нет страха, нет жадности, нет ожидания прибыли 10000% PnL с одной сделки. Там идет высокочастотный алгоритмический трейдинг, который собирает в обе стороны 24/7, в небольших диапазонах.

4

25 Jun 2025, 15:03 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет. Статистика совсем не пугает. 5% в плюсе на Дистанции это даже очень неплохо! Но надо учитывать, что в эти 5% входят пару врунишек и еще несколько человек нажали просто по приколу)), вот и выходит реальная цифра 1-3% зарабатывают, остальные либо теряют либо в лучшем случае при своих.

24 Jun 2025, 16:28 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 7 August 2026

Вы пока голосуйте, завтра продолжу свою мысль 🙌

24 Jun 2025, 13:56 UTC≈1,120 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Все таки есть у нас в Канале один врунишка 😁

😁13🤡5🐳3🤣1

24 Jun 2025, 12:11 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

За всё время Торговли суммарно ты в Плюсе?

  1. Да, большой плюс6%
  2. Да, но совсем немного9%
  3. Примерно при своих13%
  4. Нет, небольшой минус29%
  5. Нет, большой минус43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jun 2025, 12:08 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 7 August 2026

Следующий вопрос будет очень болезненным, но нужно набраться смелости и ответить на него))

24 Jun 2025, 12:07 UTC818 viewsread 7 August 2026

На текущий момент опроса вижу что более 70% проголосовавших так или иначе уже в Трейдинге. Не удивительно, иначе что бы вы делали на моем канале)

24 Jun 2025, 10:11 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Твой уровень в Трейдинге?

  1. Профи, большой опыт11%
  2. Любитель, периодически торгую45%
  3. Новичок, начинаю изучать21%
  4. Зритель, смотрю как все выше перечисленные теряют свои деньги 😂23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OnProfitChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jun 2025, 16:39 UTCAnonymous Poll216 voters

Согласен с тем что заработать на Рынке стало сложнее чем раньше?

  1. Да, полностью согласен60%
  2. Ну не сказал бы что все так печально16%
  3. Нет, как рубил раньше бабки так и рублю сейчас7%
  4. Раньше только терял и сейчас теряю17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jun 2025, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Poll298 voters

За всё время Торговли суммарно ты в Плюсе?

  1. Да, большой плюс6%
  2. Да, но совсем немного9%
  3. Примерно при своих13%
  4. Нет, небольшой минус29%
  5. Нет, большой минус43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jun 2025, 10:11 UTCAnonymous Poll260 voters

Твой уровень в Трейдинге?

  1. Профи, большой опыт11%
  2. Любитель, периодически торгую45%
  3. Новичок, начинаю изучать21%
  4. Зритель, смотрю как все выше перечисленные теряют свои деньги 😂23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Jun 2025, 07:48 UTCAnonymous Poll262 voters

Ждёте Альтсезон? 😄

  1. Да, точно этим Летом25%
  2. Да, но к концу Года29%
  3. Нет, разочаровался и Продал18%
  4. Альтсезон? Что это?🥹27%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2025 to 28 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мус и Крипта
@mus_money_official · 45,937
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OnProfit CHANNEL” (@OnProfitChannel), 1,885 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OnProfitChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.