Channel
@Oli_Signals
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,902subscribers
-330 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001984785904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Oli_Signals |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Oli_Signals |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 7,902 | -47 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 7,949 | -19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 7,968 | -27 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 7,995 | -28 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 8,023 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 8,047 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 8,068 | -20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 8,088 | -30 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 8,118 | -26 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 8,144 | -27 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 8,171 | -34 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 8,205 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 8,229 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 8,232 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 8,232 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This #ETH signal brought me really strong results. By the way, the opportunity is still active, so I would not waste time here. I am definitely not stopping and will continue working with it. You can see the results in the screenshots: the second ones show my deposits, and the first ones show my withdrawals from Oveodex.
🎰 FOMO becomes the number one trading terminal in terms of daily market share.
The arbitrage is already in full swing. 🔥 The market is active right now and the spread is still open, so don't waste the opportunity while it lasts. Those who already started are working with the setup — everyone else still has time to join while the window remains active. 👀
📍Arbitrage opportunity! Market continues to grow and delight us with arbitrage opportunities. There are quite a few of them popping up right now, and we're trying to bring you the best ones. They appear most frequently on less popular exchanges, and we just noticed one on https://oveodex.com/. #ETH there has grown much more than on others, and it would be a shame not to take advantage of this opportunity. Here's w…
🔹 Is it legal? Yes. P2P arbitrage itself is legal when you work correctly and use official platforms. ✅ I personally work with trusted services and exchanges such as: 🌐 Bybit ✅ Binance 🤴 Trust Wallet and other well-known crypto platforms. P2P trading is simply the exchange of digital assets between users through official systems with security and verification tools. The most important thing is: ✅ follow platform ru…
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Many people believe that making serious money in trading requires a large starting balance. 🛡 But capital is only one part of the equation. A clear strategy, disciplined execution, proper risk management, and the right mentorship can make a much bigger difference That’s why I’m introducing a step-by-step format where we begin with $400 and work toward a $4,000 target while focusing on the process along the…
❗️ This arbitrage signal is now closed. We've removed all related posts to prevent anyone from entering after the opportunity has ended. A huge thank you to everyone for your trust and support. 🙏 Every profitable cycle is another step forward for our community, and we're already working on the next opportunity. 🔥 If you want to see more arbitrage signals, drop a reaction below and stay tuned — the next one could …
❤4👍1
"Bitcoin always bottoms when Weekly RSI goes oversold!"👀 Yes, it has so far, but that does not mean it always will.📈 Let's remember the 200 Week SMA, which had never been broken to the downside before June 2022. It was also said that Bitcoin could "Not go below previous ATHs" for the cycle bottom, and it did that too.📉 This is why it's important to use many sources of data to come to good conclusions.🤓 The perfec…
❤4
#Altcoins Most people have already lost hope in Altcoinseason.🤓
🔥2
Bitcoin - if you play this right here, it will be a fantastic opportunity. Bottom phases take time during bear markets - hence I don't believe in a quick reversal. ⚡️ End of the year target: 100k.🔥 Next cycle top >250k☄️
🔥1
A major Altcoinseason we saw in 2017 and 2021 is yet to come. 2026..🚨
Structure remains supportive: 💱 Altcoins ( $APE +31.1% ) gaining traction, while $BTC consolidates. Sustained rotation into mid-caps signals underlying strength. Early expansion phase intact.
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Oli_Signals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arbitrage with Oliver” (@Oli_Signals), 7,902 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oli_Signals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.