Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адвокат Олег Лукьянчиков

Channel

Адвокат Олег Лукьянчиков

@Oleg_legalist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

63,202subscribers

-2,066 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272158938
TypeChannel
Username@Oleg_legalist
DescriptionКанал адвоката Олега Лукьянчикова. Для замовлення послуг: Телеграм: @oleg_advokat_ua Телефон: +380665551020 E-mail: [email protected] Мій ютюб канал: https://youtube.com/@OlegAdvokat З питань реклами: @oleg_lukianchykov
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Oleg_legalist

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

63,20265,26864,2357 August 2026 — 65,268 subscribers7 August 2026 — 65,263 subscribers8 August 2026 — 65,222 subscribers9 August 2026 — 65,156 subscribers10 August 2026 — 65,143 subscribers11 August 2026 — 65,150 subscribers12 August 2026 — 65,137 subscribers14 August 2026 — 65,128 subscribers15 August 2026 — 65,106 subscribers17 August 2026 — 65,069 subscribers18 August 2026 — 65,033 subscribers19 August 2026 — 65,000 subscribers20 August 2026 — 64,983 subscribers21 August 2026 — 64,955 subscribers23 August 2026 — 64,865 subscribers24 August 2026 — 64,759 subscribers25 August 2026 — 64,730 subscribers26 August 2026 — 64,657 subscribers27 August 2026 — 64,598 subscribers28 August 2026 — 64,501 subscribers29 August 2026 — 64,363 subscribers30 August 2026 — 64,233 subscribers31 August 2026 — 64,085 subscribers1 September 2026 — 63,946 subscribers2 September 2026 — 63,747 subscribers4 September 2026 — 63,710 subscribers6 September 2026 — 63,607 subscribers10 September 2026 — 63,465 subscribers12 September 2026 — 63,324 subscribers14 September 2026 — 63,282 subscribers15 September 2026 — 63,244 subscribers17 September 2026 — 63,202 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -2,066. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,892–65,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:3763,202-42
15 Sept 2026, 17:4063,244-38
14 Sept 2026, 00:5863,282-42
12 Sept 2026, 07:2163,324-141
10 Sept 2026, 05:2163,465-142
6 Sept 2026, 22:3763,607-103
4 Sept 2026, 06:1763,710-37
2 Sept 2026, 22:5663,747-199
1 Sept 2026, 21:5763,946-139
31 Aug 2026, 23:1864,085-148
30 Aug 2026, 20:4564,233-130
29 Aug 2026, 20:3464,363-138
28 Aug 2026, 23:5864,501-97
27 Aug 2026, 21:2564,598-59
26 Aug 2026, 17:5864,657-73
25 Aug 2026, 14:3564,730-29
24 Aug 2026, 13:4464,759-106
23 Aug 2026, 00:1464,865-90
21 Aug 2026, 10:4664,955-28
20 Aug 2026, 10:4564,983first reading

Engagement

348 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 63,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,700
194 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
194
of 348 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held348 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total2,843,390
Reactions total36,198
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,880
Videos
≈402
Links
≈2,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
28m 39s
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

68,264 reactions across 344 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15,44922.6%
🤣14,49921.2%
🤡11,10016.3%
💯7,59211.1%
🤬5,7308.39%
😁4,6396.80%
❤4,3806.42%
🤯1,1581.70%
🔥7921.16%
🕊6710.983%
🥴5240.768%
😢4720.691%
👎3870.567%
😱1870.274%
🤝1700.249%
🙏1370.201%
🥱1280.188%
😎1100.161%
👌910.133%
😇300.044%
1 further kind180.026%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 344 of the 348 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68,264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 348 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
233
across the posts below
Posts paid on
104
of 344 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Oleg_legalist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 348 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 14:29 UTC≈8,690 views267 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Сегодня напали с ножом на военнослужащего ТЦК в Одесской области (смотреть короткое видео)

👍182🔥48😁11🤬8😢8🤣5❤3🕊2

26 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC≈9,430 views98 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Зайти в Резерв+ станет проще: разбираем новый способ авторизации Резерв+ запускает вход через Дія.Підпис. BankID никуда не делся, выбор останется за вами. Кнопка «Войти через Дію» появляется у пользователей постепенно. Даже после обновления приложения её может ещё не быть. Это не ошибка: просто заходите через BankID, ничего дополнительно делать не нужно. Когда способ станет доступным, выберите вход через Дію, подт…

🤡38😁32❤15👍9🤣2🕊1🤬1

26 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC≈9,970 views144 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

В Верховной Раде – три законопроекта о добровольных пенсионных фондах. Они что-то там меняют. Попутно правят Налоговый и Гражданский кодексы, ориентируясь на европейские директивы. Вопрос в другом: а Вы знаете людей, которые в Украине вкладывают деньги в добровольные ПФ?

🤣73💯41🤡16👍4❤3😢3🕊2🤬2

26 Sept 2026, 08:07 UTC≈11,200 views40 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Красная полоса в Резерв: ее можно удалить? Что говорит новая судебная практика? Смотреть видео: https://youtu.be/z5T-SGP09M4

🤣20👍12❤6🕊2

26 Sept 2026, 07:48 UTC≈10,900 views38 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Реформа ТЦК: новый уровень (смотреть короткое видео)

🤣27❤5🤬4🕊2

26 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC≈11,900 views142 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Подали жалобу в Центральную военно-врачебную комиссию, а в ответ получили письмо с фразой «оснований для пересмотра нет»? Поздравляем – вашу жалобу, по сути, не рассмотрели. Киевский окружной админсуд в деле №320/12745/26 прямо признал: письмо ЦВЛК взамен постановления – это противоправное бездействие. Комиссия обязана вынести именно постановление, а не отписку. Иначе вы теряете возможность нормально обжаловать её в…

👍112❤16🤣8🕊6

25 Sept 2026, 21:53 UTC≈12,400 views96 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

ИИ решает проблему граничного возраста Или чем заняться ночью в пятницу?😄 Решил проверить, кто умнее: ноутбук от гугла или дипсик от маоцзедуна. Загрузил обоим один и тот же набор документов и задал один и тот же вопрос: правомерно ли восстановление на учете? Гуглу - не платил, а мао - платил. Результат - на скрине: ноутбук считает, что восстановление не правомерно, а дипсик - правомерно. Вывод: LLM достигли уро…

😁51👍25❤15🤣2🔥1🕊1🥴1

25 Sept 2026, 17:33 UTC≈12,300 views79 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Решение суда об отмене пунктов 17 и 17-1 Постановления 932 суд решил не публиковать🙂 Текст у меня есть (гуглом пользоваться умею). Готовлю видео (будет завтра или послезавтра).

👍55🤯9🤣6❤5🕊2😁2

25 Sept 2026, 15:51 UTC≈13,000 views98 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Победа без победы. Не хотел писать про данное дело, но решил, что это будет не совсем честно. Поэтому делюсь болью. Итак, студент, поступил в магистратуру, но не может получить отсрочку ибо ранее уже учился на этом уровне (не закончил). Пошли в суд и выиграли Министерства образования - суд обязал их изменить записи в справке ЕДЕБО (дело №320/10571/25). А где боль? Здесь: суд так "быстро" рассмотрел дело, что маги…

👍54🤣20❤10🔥3😁3😢3🕊2🙏2

25 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC≈13,000 views87 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

О смене места работы ТЦК узнает от роботодателя и налоговой. Необходимости сообщать об этом лично - нет. На отсрочку это не влияет.

🤣47👍31❤5🕊2🤡2

25 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC≈13,200 views54 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Изменения правил трудоустройства иностранцев — что предлагает законопроект №16073 Законопроект № 16073 предлагает отменить старое разрешение на труд иностранцев и ввести единый документ – посвідку на проживание и работу. Получать её будет сам иностранец, а не компания. Заявление – онлайн, решение миграционной службы – за 30 дней. Но без работодателя всё равно никуда. Сперва он обязан согласовать вакансию со службой…

🤣28❤13👍7🤡3👎2🕊1

25 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC≈12,800 views408 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Скинул это жене, пока ее нет дома😁 Кто знает, сколько мне жить осталось?🤔

🤣277👍69😁33❤12🙏9🕊2🤡2😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 348 posts we hold for @Oleg_legalist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTCAnonymous Poll1,850 voters approx.

НДС на посылки до 150 евро:

  1. Считаю важным27%
  2. Не пойму, почему столько внимания уделяется этому вопросу74%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 348 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адвокат Олег Лукьянчиков” (@Oleg_legalist), 63,202 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oleg_legalist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.