Channel
@Ol_Wood
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002020864582 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ol_Wood |
| Description | ВП: @Wood_Ol Моя самая лучшая🫀: @nicolewalkerdiary Добро пожаловать на канал сексуального парня. В описании не буду раскрывать всего, лучше читай дневник) |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ol_Wood |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 11 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 11 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
78 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 27 | 34.6% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 17.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 10.3% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 10.3% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.41% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2024 to 26 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Оливер, не отрывая взгляда от Николь, прижался к ней, покрывая губы нежными, бережными поцелуями. Он чувствовал в ней расслабление, покой, который так не хватало ему всю прошедшую неделю. В этом поцелуе были все его чувства, вся его любовь к ней. Он как будто переживал заново все прошедшие дни, вспоминал одиночество и пустоту без нее, и сейчас не мог отказать себе в удовольствии просто держать её в своих руках, чувс…
💋1💯1
𝑂𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑊𝑜𝑜𝑑 🏈 #𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕦𝕘𝕙𝕥𝕤
💋5🥰3❤🔥2🍓1💔1💯1
File, posted without a caption
💔2❤1
It's not true Tell me I've been lied to Crying isn't like you What the hell did I do? Never been the type to Let someone see right through Maybe won't you take it back? Say you were tryna make me laugh And nothing has to change today You didn't mean to say "I love you" I love you And I don't want to 𝑂𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑊𝑜𝑜𝑑 🏈 #𝕞𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕔
❤2🍓2💋2💔2🥰2💯1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥1💋1💔1💯1
Прошлая часть - Не хочу никому об этом говорить — добавила она, будто бы страшась негативных реакций, ожидая суда, который, он знал, будет неминуем. Её слова усиливали его безысходность. Он не мог ничего изменить, ни оправдать, ни исправить. Он потерял её, потерял навсегда. Вуд кивнул, чувствуя бессилие и тяжесть в груди. -Поехали домой - выдавил он, голос его был охрипшим. Ему хотелось потеряться в пустоте, в б…
💋4❤🔥3💔3💯2
Photo, posted without a caption
💋2❤1
Скоро пост!!
💋2
Прошлая часть Сердце Оливера бешено колотилось. Он никогда не видел Николь такой решительной и неумолимой. Он знал, что она любит риск, но никогда не думал, что она осмелится сесть за руль гоночной машины. Он бросил взгляд на своего соперника, который, казалось, был шокирован не меньше, чем он сам. Тот, заметив пристальный взгляд Оливера, лишь пожал плечами и ухмыльнулся. -Видимо, твоя подружка хочет отомстить - …
💋5❤4❤🔥4💔3💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
💋1
Ветер трепал мои волосы, когда я взлетал на метле, паря над стадионом, ликующим от моей победы. В этот день я поймал снитч, обеспечив Гриффиндору очередную победу над Слизерином. Но, несмотря на ликование болельщиков, я чувствовал пустоту. Мне не с кем было разделить этот триумф. Она сидела на трибуне, в толпе ярко одетых болельщиков. Ее волосы были цвета вороньего крыла, а глаза - небесно-голубые, как летнее небо. …
❤🔥3💋3💔2💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Ol_Wood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 789,161 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑂𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑊𝑜𝑜𝑑” (@Ol_Wood), 11 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ol_Wood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.